- Joined
- 15 March 2006
- Posts
- 469
- Reactions
- 0
wayneL said:Thats just Jim ramping LOL
Metals? In the face of the imminent depression? Perhaps if there is hyper inflation. (a strong possibility)
But as a case for a lasting bull, the video was a tad short of substance.
Nobody owns commodities? LOL It doesn't work that way. Commodities are NOT and investment per se'... and they are owned via the stockmarket.
Cheers
michael_selway said:Jims Flaw is that he always says historically, in real terms, we are below all time highs
But the thing is History doesnt necessarily repeat itself, it doesnt have to
But I do believe there is 1 or 2 more yrs left 3 maybe, but crash will eb coming esp if prices goes higher
MS
BSD said:The whole bear argument is based on a historical fallacy.
"Prices must return to their old lows from the '90s. The supply is coming because it did last time. "
Nobody now believes oil will go back to $10bbl - why are base metals different?
Supply in copper is not coming for at least three-five years and it will come at a far greater marginal cost than that of the miners in the 90s.
What % of current (let alone future) copper supply could operate at $0.80c?
I don't believe these prices should be rocketting up in a straight line - but cannot buy the bear case in lieu of a global depression, which I certainly cannot see as imminent.
Emphasis mine. Prices not going up in a straight line means that at some point they go down. Question is when and how far?BSD said:The whole bear argument is based on a historical fallacy.
"Prices must return to their old lows from the '90s. The supply is coming because it did last time. "
Nobody now believes oil will go back to $10bbl - why are base metals different?
Supply in copper is not coming for at least three-five years and it will come at a far greater marginal cost than that of the miners in the 90s.
What % of current (let alone future) copper supply could operate at $0.80c?
I don't believe these prices should be rocketting up in a straight line - but cannot buy the bear case in lieu of a global depression, which I certainly cannot see as imminent.
pacer said:KEN...NO! ........A verry good idea, unless there is a crash going on then hold till $22.....unless ur doing cfd's then wait till $24.15- $24.16....just keep an eye on it and bail at your own STOP.....Like I said $23 is the psychological buy time and I mean $23 not $23.95....if it hits that.......I held to =$29.99 and folded, from $18, and missed 32 but a win was enuf.....and took the falls from $29.99 on cfd's aswell and can honestly say i enjoyed the ride...especialy since I was trading in a cafe in thailand once a day after it hit .......buy more and more.....unless you believe in a bad october crash....not this year I think....best buying time....scaredy cats!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Do your on thing............but don't be a gambler...unless you're lucky .... like me....LOL
UBS lowers iron ore forecast, cuts Rio/BHP earnings
Source: Dow Jones
UBS said the iron ore market could also be affected by China's move to boost its own production, which rose 47% last year.
As a result UBS is now forecasting a 5% drop in contract iron ore prices in 2007, compared with an earlier prediction of a 10% rise.
In 2008 UBS now expects prices to fall 15%, where previously it had forecast a 10% decrease.
In a client note UBS analysts said the growing materials production from China now had markets asking "could this be the factor that sinks global basic materials equity sentiment, itself already adjusting to a cyclical downdraft?".
As a result of the changes to price expectations, UBS has cut its earnings forecast for Rio Tinto Plc. (RTP) by 6% in calendar 2007 and 9% in 2008 and for BHP Billiton (BHP) by 3% in 2007 and 4% the following year.
Rio Tinto is the world's second largest iron ore producer and BHP the third. Together with Brazil's Companhia Vale do Rio Doce (RIO), the two Australian companies are key players in the annual iron ore contract negotiations with steel mills.
For the current Japanese fiscal year that ends next March, the miners won a higher than expected 19% increase after drawn-out talks with Chinese mills. A year earlier, the hike was 71.5%.
UBS said the spot price for iron ore remains strong for now and whether or not this strength is maintained will be interesting to watch in the run up to negotiations set to begin later in 2006.
BSD said:The global recession story is incredibly strong, but for lack of real evidence. Let alone a depression.
BSD said:http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601012&refer=commodities&sid=aQs.ur_n1BIg
Sept. 26 (Bloomberg) -- Copper rose to a two-week high on speculation that makers of metal wires and pipes, particularly in China, will increase purchases to avoid a supply shortfall this year.
Demand for copper will exceed mine output by 52,000 metric tons through 2006, after a deficit of 360,000 tons last year, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. forecast on Sept. 18. Stockpiles have plunged 86 percent in the past four years, leaving stockpiles monitored by the London Metal Exchange at levels sufficient to meet demand for just three days.
``There is no doubt that consumers are adding support to this market,'' said Peter Hickson, a London-based strategist at UBS Ltd. who has worked more than three decades in the metals and mining industry, including the last 12 as a metals analyst.
``The Chinese have got themselves short of copper,'' he said. Copper's 14 percent decline from its record high came from selling by hedge funds, not actual users of the metal, he said.
The iron (and coal for that matter) downgrades are new and interesting. I thinks three banks moved down yesterday.
Most analysts had/have 'price rollover' or a +/- 10% in their numbers.
Not a bad result if you consider the doubling in two years will be effectively sustained.
Maybe we should consider what happens if Cu remains above $3 for three years?
wayneL said:Bloomberg should never be believed...unless of course, they post something bearish
hos11au said:anyone else getting the feeling that bhp will explode upwards?
Realist said:I AM!!:
Rio as well....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?