- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 28,963
- Reactions
- 26,822
Excellent observation, well made Bellenuit. I'm seeing more and more e-bikes around the place. They're fantastic for local commuting, and there are more and more bicycle tracks being built by local government.What is taking off, particularly in Europe and China, is micro-mobility: electric bicycles and the like. I have read figures that suggest that there are 10 of these category of vehicle sold for every electric car.
Ultimately it's very simple.Bill Shorten / NRMA want people to throw $50K down this toilet ?
Great for a place like King Island - a bloody joke on the mainland.
There are certainly some serious technical issues involved, the most notable one being that even if 20% of homes charge a single EV during the early evening then that's a concern in terms of the power grid.This is a typical example of political interference and dumb ar$e statements, for political mileage.
Some good ideas there but...Ultimately it's very simple.
28% of fossil fuel use is in transport, 40% is in electricity. I've posted a lot of details and statistics about this in the energy thread.
If we're going to cut emissions substantially and have 45% or 50% renewable energy as per the political promises then quite simply electricity can't do the whole lot of the task, especially in the context of rising fuel use in the transport sector as has been the trend. That leaves really only three options:
1. Population reduction
2. Transport cannot continue with almost total reliance on petroleum fuels using present technology
3. Simply scale back the use of transport
Simple as that really and the rest is detail although I'll note that option 2 is the only one likely to be even remotely palatable politically so there's not a lot of choice.
That leaves the choice for government as whether to favour hydrogen or electric vehicles, or to take a neutral stance and see where the manufacturers go.
Another approach, and one I see a lot of merit in, is to simply legislate an emissions cap on the basis of a manufacturer's total sales. That doesn't preclude someone still selling a V12 just so long as they sell a lot of EV's to keep the average within the cap. That approach has been used successfully in the US, albeit with lesser targets, but as a concept it seems workable and is technology neutral in terms of how to achieve it.
We have a couple of electric bikes, they are brilliant for local commuting, also they do give people an excercise option.Excellent observation, well made Bellenuit. I'm seeing more and more e-bikes around the place. They're fantastic for local commuting, and there are more and more bicycle tracks being built by local government.
As with everything labor does, it will be half ar$ed, poorly implemented and pursued no matter what the cost to the taxpayer.Some good ideas there but...
I think it simply comes down to improving the technology before forcing people to rely on it.
Battery efficiency just isn't good enough yet. It needs to be able to power a family car for a long enough distance for people to not rely on available charging stations every 3 hours.
I'm sure we'll get there but until we do we don't need politicians forcing their pet projects down our throats which is effectively what Labor are doing here.
There are certainly some serious technical issues involved, the most notable one being that even if 20% of homes charge a single EV during the early evening then that's a concern in terms of the power grid.
There are workarounds to that, controlling the rate of charging to match supply capability isn't rocket science as a concept in a world where the internet is just about everywhere, but that sort of thing needs to be worked out before we've got lots of them on the roads and are then chasing our tail trying to implement a solution for the existing vehicles.
It would be preferable to not have politicians and the general public become aware of this need by means of a system collapse.
I saw Andrew Bolt in the Herald Sun yesterday writing that he thinks it's important to kick out the moderates from the Liberal party so they can renew so it would be good for Labor to get in for a term but now is worried that Labor will cause more damage than expected.
Well it's on your head Bolt. You pushed for it, you got what you wanted, Bishop, Pyne, Turnbull anyone with any popularity has left the party and your preferred people are in control. I also note today more information has come forward showing Newscorp through a Murdoch son having a meeting with Liberal politicians saying MT must go.
Best outcome for is maximum chaos in the Senate via centrist, slightly right independents.
Another 3 years of obstruction , delay and party politicking ?
I think I'd prefer a Labor majority in both houses, at least something would be done that we could judge the merits of at the next election.
I'm sick of the Senate freaks, Hanson Lleyonhejlme etc. Some will go but we are stuck with Hanson for another 3 years.
I'd just like a glimpse of what responsible government looks like for once.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?