Tisme
Apathetic at Best
- Joined
- 27 August 2014
- Posts
- 8,954
- Reactions
- 1,152
If we are a secular nation, then maybe we should tolerate religions of any type less.
Throw away the silly superstitions and get some clear thinking in our governments and schools.
Don't publicly finance religious schools for a start.
Maybe that means showing disapproval of the things that some religious people do, like Halal certification, hiding their faces in public arranged marriages , female genital mutilation etc, just as we are holding Royal Commissions into child abuse.
I want this country to stay secular and pandering to religion of any sort won't keep it that way.
Remember those pics of Afghanistan in the sixties contrasted with today? The girls in mini skirts laughing compared to the girl on the cover of National Geographic?
You have a right to protest and rail against those that would give away what our forebears fought for. It is obvious our constitution has secular clauses in it for a damned good reason ....... can you imagine what we would be like now with all those catholics in govt having to answer to the pope if not for the law demanding they do not? We'd all be running around with catholic guilt worrying god was going to do bad things to us, fessing up to voyeuristic pedophile blokes in dresses about our personal lives and wearing budgie smugglers!!!!
I reckon religious affiliation should be a disqualification from public office, or at least be publicly declared beforehand.
We are doing more for Muslims in Australia than any other country and by many it is not appreciated.
Henry Ergas tells the story.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opi...556732787?sv=2b6afd776ce4cf41e1b2d8810efb3431
I think the only way we are are going to solve the "home grown" terrorists is by appeasement, inclusion and community consultation:
who would object to the govt adopting all three measures and applying them to the majority of the population for a change?
Meanwhile start building departure cargo wharves in the capitals I reckon.
Ah yes, appeasement worked out really well for Neville Chamberlain didn't it ?
Wrapping minorities in cotton wool is ridiculous, it just empowers the feeble minded among them.
I'm surprised they haven't resorted to comparing themselves to the oppression wrought against the blacks in deep south USA to advance their cause.
That will come, don't worry, especially if some of them read this site.
Where does this racist right wing nut case get off, telling muslims "if they don't like Australia, to leave".
It' a typical racist remark we have come to expect,.
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/parramatt...-to-where-they-came-from-20151008-gk45x6.html
Oh it's one of them saying it, that's o.k.
Just don't think you Australians, can get away with saying it.
The OSB monthly update for September has been published and it's been another month with no boats.
http://newsroom.border.gov.au/chann...leases/monthly-operational-update-september-4
Immigration Minister Peter Dutton told News Corp he would not support a change in government policy.
"I understand the concern of doctors, but the Defence and Border Force staff on our vessels who were pulling dead kids out of the water don't want the boats to restart," he said.
Mr BANDT ( Melbourne ) ( 14:30 ): My question is to the Prime Minister. Staff at the Royal Children's Hospital in my electorate have refused to discharge asylum seeker children because your government will lock them back up in detention centres where children are self-harming and becoming suicidal. No-one wants to see people drown at sea, but do you really believe that we cannot find a solution that does not involve locking up babies and children in mental illness factories? Prime Minister, will you accept that previous Labor and Liberal governments got it wrong, and will you release all children from detention?
Mr TURNBULL (Wentworth””Prime Minister) (14:31): I thank the honourable member for his question. I will respond to it with the gravity it deserves. But I would simply note this: the honourable member said 'nobody wants people to die at sea'. I accept that the honourable member does not. The simple fact””the melancholy truth””is that the policies that he and his party supported, and still support, have been proven to have that consequence. There is no doubt about that. This is not a question of theory; this is a question of fact. There was an experiment undertaken under the Labor government. Mr Rudd himself regretted it and sought to change it. The fact is it was done, it happened, it was a mistake, people died.
Nobody wants to have children in detention””not me, not any member of this House, not anyone, not any Australian. We have been working very hard to reduce those numbers. Under the Labor government, the number of children in detention peaked at almost 2,000. Under this government, those numbers have been dramatically reduced. There are currently, so I am advised, around 100 in Australia and somewhat fewer than that in Nauru. That work is continuing to be done. That is the goal.
Turning to questions of medical assistance, let me just make this point: if people require medical assistance, they will receive it. Whether it is on Nauru or in Australia, they will receive it. That is the government's commitment. If there is a complicated pregnancy or an assault where a person cannot be given appropriate medical attention on Nauru, they are brought back to Australia. That has been done consistently over a long period of time.
I say to the honourable member, and I say to all honourable members and to all Australians, we recognise that our border protection policy is tough; we recognise that many would see it as harsh. But it has been proven to be the only way to stop those deaths at sea and to ensure that our sovereignty and our borders are safe. This is not a theoretical exercise. I have to say to the honourable member: he should reflect very seriously on his own party's conscience on this vital matter.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?