This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

ASX 200 Monthly Momentum Strategy - Review and Insights

Jump to new
V

vharik831

Joined
3 April 2015
Posts
17
Reactions
16
Hi All,

I have attached the strategy backtest report from Amibroker for a monthly strategy I am working on.

Whilst the results look promising, I wanted to get feedback on the stats, where you see issues.

I am concerned about the Monte carlo analysis.
I donot fully understand on how to interpret Monte carlo analysis results. But i do see a lot of zeroes in there
So, would like some help from the experienced. Is it a risk to trade this system as is?

PS: I had to attach the report in zip format as HTML attachments are not accepted. Let me know if you are concerned with opening zip files. I will attach image files.

Regards,
Hari
 

Attachments

  • Monthly Momentum Strategy - Backtest Report 13 Yrs.zip
    3 KB · Views: 58
First, MC analysis is very important as it allow you to fully understand how your system performs with selection bias. Second, the way MC is done in AB is pretty poor and rudimentary at best. Best way to do MC analysis is add the code "mtRandom() > 0.7" to your "buy" line. Insert a dummy parameter and optimize it over say 1000 or more runs. Export the optimization output into a CSV file and then import into Excel. Then using the Data Analysis plugin select an output parameter (say net profit or system draw down) and put that into a histogram. What you will then get is a complete picture of how your system performs with selection bias. This is much more insightful than the built in MC of AB. Also the way AB does MC is a little questionable. Here is a few pics of a system I recently back-tested using the same technique. For simplicity I'm only including net profit and system drawdown but you can pretty much review any back-test output stat from AB to get a complete picture of how your system performs with selection bias. Like I said, MC testing is extremely important if you really want to understand the behavior of your system. It is very hard to judge a system's performance based on a single run.



 
Thank you! Appreciate your response and I will give this a go.
After I get the buy setups, I use position score to rank the stocks. Then i pick the top 10 stocks to start with and as I exit positions, i take the top stock, ranked by the position score, every month.

So, what I am trying to figure out is which variable Monte carlo is trying to simulate? Is it just the timing of which month I start trading my system? I believe picking of the stocks from a bucket of stocks is no longer random due to ranking the stocks.

Regards,
Hari
 
if its a rotational monthly system then it hinges on your ranking method. improving that will change the stats.

from whats presented it appears to be a good system, though I'm not sure how you got such a low MDD from 13yrs of backtesting. seems unusually low.
 
Without getting too complex, the MC in AB is not simulating any variables. For want of a better description it just does a shuffle of the order in which stocks are taken. In the mtRandom() example I did your simulation will make a binary decision as to whether an entry should be taken so what you get with the dummy optimize is a a bunch of different stock selections if that makes sense.
 
Thanks Warr87. MDD is fluctuating based on the year I start. The back test report started on Jan 2008. But if I had started on Jan 2007, MDD became -33%. This was due to the outlier year - 2008.
 
start time is definitely a factor. even sharpe ratio (if you like that metric) will drastically change if you happen to backtest right before a 'black swan' event. but that's also why the MDD being less than 20% over such a long period of time seems low. but i don't know what kind of filters you have in place. and it by no knows your results aren't valid.

looking at an average DD could also be important to have a realistic understanding of how often, or to what degree, you are in a DD. MDD is obviously the worst case scenario.

im currently really likely my own monthly momentum system, though mine is 'riskier' than yours (I removed index filters), though my return is higher. it has been trading pretty well right now.

my own system, in my testing, appeared to fair better with more positions as well. something for you to consider. (I currently run it with 10 positions, but even up to 40 positions it has reduced MDD likely due to a spread risk amongst more positions.)
 
great inputs. Thanks. Yes, I played with the number of positions and 10 is the sweet spot for my system as well. I dont have an index filter, but my exit is tight. I get out on the first sign of weakness. However, due to the system being monthly, first sign of weakness is often too late!

Tried adding an index filter to entry, but it reduces the returns drastically, which could be due to, missing out on the initial part of the recovery cycle.

Yes, I look at the sharpe ration and you are right. When you start the system is critical. Irrespective of when I start the first year is either a looser or is marginally profitable.

I am not yet in that frame of mind to trade monthly, which requires a lot of patience. I trade a daily system and I feel a lot more in control.
 
I noted in my own trading that monthly can be great, but as you say, when there is weakness it can be too late. I've entered into positions and a week later, they all dropped dramatically. but that is part of the game really. there is a trade off for it requiring less time to manage.
 
I now have these for my system. Troubling part is the net profit that I get when I run the system for the same time frame(as the optimization) is not even reported in the optimization reports!

If I am interpreting the net profit % graph correctly, does that say that the system is more likely to generate profit between 382% and 800%?



 

While the Net Profit % is not a gaussian distribution I reckon your estimate of 382 to 800 is probably on the money. Your Sys Drawdown looks to be pretty much gaussian so so I reckon you're on the money to expect 2SD of 17% DD. That's a pretty good looking Sys Drawdown for a monthly system. As a general rule the lower the Sys Drawdown the lower the net profit. I must admit for 13 years of trades a net profit of 392 to 800 is a little on the low side, but hey you have an impressive DD so that is to be expected.
 
BTW, how many trades did your system do in that 13 year period? The other reason I was reluctant to go live with my monthly system is I felt the number of trades wasn't statistically relevant so my level of confidence in the back testing was low
 
MovingAverage said:
BTW, how many trades did your system do in that 13 year period? The other reason I was reluctant to go live with my monthly system is I felt the number of trades wasn't statistically relevant so my level of confidence in the back testing was low
Click to expand...
Number of trades are about 350 over 13 years, that is up to 2 trades on an average per month, with 10 open positions most of the time.

Thanks for your analysis of the histograms.
 
The boffins at Macquarie have examined the earnings momentum for ASX 300 stocks. They have ranked it across four stages, from stocks where earnings momentum has bottomed and is improving (stages one and two) through to stocks where earnings momentum has peaked and is declining (stages three and four).

Part one of the strategy is to favour stocks that have had their 2026 earnings forecasts upgraded recently, where momentum is positive, and where Macquarie’s analysts have an “outperform” rating, which is the firm’s equivalent to a “buy”.

Six stocks sit at the top of the Macquarie list: medical devices giant Resmed, property group GPT, retailer Metcash, toll road operator Atlas Arteria, gas pipeline player APA Group and explosives manufacturer Orica. Small-cap names on the Macquarie list include Growthpoint Properties, infrastructure group Chorus, Graincorp, and AUB Group.

The second part is to avoid companies that have experienced earnings downgrades and where earnings momentum is poor. Despite the market rally, this is a surprisingly target-rich environment right now – 22 per cent of the ASX 100 have seen downgrades of 20 percentage points or more.

Macquarie’s top five names to avoid include ANZ, online classifieds firm REA Group, pubs and bottle shop giant Endeavour Group, James Hardie Industries and Rio Tinto. Other companies to have suffered big downgrades include Computershare, Flight Centre, CSL, Treasury Wine Estates, Reliance Worldwide, Orora, South32, BHP, Fortescue, Mineral Resources, IGO and Pilbara Metals.

Many fund managers will rightly argue that buying or selling stocks based on earnings momentum rather than fundamentals is ultimately a fool’s errand.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Amibroker and Monte Carlo backtesting - I think I've cracked it
Replies
6
Views
9K
Harro26
H
H
Trading strategy development - Lessons Learnt
Replies
19
Views
12K
Wysiwyg
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...