IFocus
You are arguing with a Galah
- Joined
- 8 September 2006
- Posts
- 8,104
- Reactions
- 5,414
The discussion on this subject seems to suggest 5% are absolute geniuses and the 95% are absolute buffoons, How about a scale 1 to 100. I'd suggest I'm not in the 5% because I have no desire to be there. However I expect to be ahead of the 50% point and am happy with my results to date and claim to be around the 80 to 90% mark. I'm still showing a good profit so far this year. Does that count?
Swing trading is just trend trading in a shorter time frame - betting a reversal in a trend is just temporary. Thus, like trend trading, it does not provide a true edge, but relies on risk and money management to be profitable (not that there's anything wrong with that).
Swing trading is just trend trading in a shorter time frame - betting a reversal in a trend is just temporary. Thus, like trend trading, it does not provide a true edge, but relies on risk and money management to be profitable (not that there's anything wrong with that).
Is it important to be in the top 5%?
If so, is it important to know you're in the top 5%?
If so, is it important to tell all and sundry that you're in the top 5%?
Is is important to be 100% of what you can be or what you want to be, wherever you are on the scale, whatever that is, and let people think what they will?
Is comparison a thing of the ego?
Referring specifically to trading;Is it important to be in the top 5%?
If so, is it important to know you're in the top 5%?
If so, is it important to tell all and sundry that you're in the top 5%?
Tech,To 5%
If you dont know then your not in the 5%
Important no.
Or
To some no doubt.
To some no doubt.
Or aren't arrogant enough to assign yourself such a special position.If you dont know then your not in the 5%
A true edge is a fundamental truth about market participants and their behaviour.What is a true edge?
Referring specifically to trading;
Level 1 of the 95/5 fractal;
1. Yes, it's important to be in the top 5% since they are the only ones actually making money. Since no one on the surface admits to trading for anything other than the reason of making money, you must by definition strive to be in the 5%. Otherwise you might as well go to the casino and at least get enjoyment out of losing your money instead of pain.
2. You'll know you're in the top 5% since you're making money consistently.
3. It will lead to psychological trauma to yourself to tell all and sundry that you are in the top 5% as no one will want to listen to your thoughts on how to get into this 5%.
Level 2 of the fractal;
1. If making extraordinary returns is required, then yes you need to be in the top 5% of the top 5%.
2. You'll know you're in the top 5% of the top 5% since you will view the market totally differently to the other profitable traders.
3. It is anathema to tell all and sundry that you've reached this level - it would be both fatal to your psychology and your edge(s).
Tech,
For one who so preaches outside of the box thinking, those answers are remarkably inside the box.
Just my opinion.
Or aren't arrogant enough to assign yourself such a special position.
Top 5% of wealth---Those that can do what they want when they want,support who they want and what they want to support whenever they wish and choose to work or not and can do for an indefinate period regardless of their current age.
Top 5% of property investors.---Those that recieve a passive income from property and are un affected by market swings/recession/depression and hold a portfolio greater than their house---this could be just 1 IP.
Top 5% of Traders---Those that can turn a consistent profit in any market condition over a period long enough to generate both bullish and bearish conditions.(years)
Top 5% in Business---Those that have businesses which turn a profit well above a basic wage wether they are working in the business or not for prolonged periods of time (Months) without effecting profit.That are established enough to ride out Recession/Depression/good and bad times.
Regardless of color,creed,education,religion,ability to spell,mathamatical skill,type of car they drive or wives they keep.
If your not in the 5% then yes inferring/pretending you were would be both delusional (Personal) and arrogant (as seen by others who know the truth).
It's not just that though.
How on Earth can people say that they are definitively in the top 5% when it comes to trading? It's not like there is a giant ladder with finals every season to decide ranking and seedings.
And does this 5% mean for your age? For your progress and development when it comes to trading? For your type of trading? Does it mean that if you are at 94.9% in the rankings you suddenly become unprofitable, unsuccessful and go broke?
No-one can answer these things. They are incalculable. And to say, "look at me, I'm in the top 5%" is laughable.
I don't think I would be in the top 5% in trading. Definitely not, probably. But for my age? Perhaps. Who knows? Especially when most people my age have not been trading for long enough to even know what they are doing. And does that make me unsuccessful? By going on what has been said in this thread, the answer would have to be yes.
But do people my age have potential to be in that 5%? Yep. Do I? Yep. Will I know if I'm ever in that 5%? Nup. Will I proclaim it to the world if by some measure I get there? Nup. I'll leave it at other people making a judgment on that.
And why this need for validation from other people saying, "yep, you're in the 5%"?
If you are meeting your own goals and always striving to do better, is there anything else that needs to be done?
And FWIW, I would never consider someone trading the same mechanical system, or same system for that matter, year in, year out, never changing it, to be in the top 5%. That's complacency and certainly not a top 5% trait in ANY field.
Top 5% Sharemarket Investors---Those that receive a passive income from investing in shares and are unaffected by market swings/recession/depression and hold a portfolio greater than their house---this could be just half a dozen blue chip stocks?
No they are quantifyable.
That's not the same as quantifying themselves in a top x%.A surgeon knows he is a successful surgeon,so does a baker,so does a mechanic,so does a consistently profitable trader.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?