Your Investment IQ

[Julia]

There is an interesting questionnaire about your investing profile on

www.marktier.com

which claims to tell you your investing IQ.

It came to me via one of the financial organisations from whom I had had a free trial some time ago.

I did it and found it very accurate. e.g. It pointed out my worst weakness which is being unclear about why and when to exit a stock, and various other characteristics which were really close to the bone, and gave suggestions for how to overcome these weaknesses.

I'd be interested to hear comments from other forum members who feel like doing the test - it takes about 10 minutes and your results are emailed back within about 15 minutes.

Julia

 

[It's Snake Pliskin]

Julia,

It sounds like you don't have a plan with steps on selling to follow.

Read some systems development books and trade the plan.

Snake

 

[crash82au]

Although Im only learning at the moment and have made only 2 trades, I completed this test. I couldnt answer a lot of questions and the results are bit sceptical for me

I plan on developing a trading plan so I assume the results of the test wouldve been a lot different if I had a system to trade to in place.

 

[Julia]

Although Im only learning at the moment and have made only 2 trades, I completed this test. I couldnt answer a lot of questions and the results are bit sceptical for me

I plan on developing a trading plan so I assume the results of the test wouldve been a lot different if I had a system to trade to in place.

Crash,

Not sure what you mean by "the results are a bit sceptical for me"?

Also not sure how you could get a valid result if you couldn't answer all the questions.

Julia

 

[crash82au]

Hey Julia - Im sceptical of the results because Im inexperienced and the results rate my investment ability close to expert. I answered all questions, but once I begin trading seriously(with a plan) the outcome would be a lot different. So maybe it has tested my so called 'investment iq' to the ways I currently trade the market. Still interesting though.

Danial

 

[canny]

Thanks Julia - that killed a few minutes and made me think about myself!!

I learnt that I need to know more about computers, as I can't post the chart they sent me!!!
How did the last poster do it?

Investment IQ Report Prepared For: Don't know how to post the chart!! I got 79.9%
To Summarize:

By and large, you are getting the investment results you desire
You have many of the strengths of highly successful investors
You are almost always calm and considered when implementing investment decisions -- and indeed, you are probably reasonably satisfied with your performance under pressure

 

[michael_selway]

There is an interesting questionnaire about your investing profile on

www.marktier.com

which claims to tell you your investing IQ.

It came to me via one of the financial organisations from whom I had had a free trial some time ago.

I did it and found it very accurate. e.g. It pointed out my worst weakness which is being unclear about why and when to exit a stock, and various other characteristics which were really close to the bone, and gave suggestions for how to overcome these weaknesses.

I'd be interested to hear comments from other forum members who feel like doing the test - it takes about 10 minutes and your results are emailed back within about 15 minutes.

Julia

Wow Thanks! Julia can you please post your chart!

http://www.marktier.com/IQ-test.htm

http://marktier.com/ippq/Graph.php?retval=73.2

Investment IQ Report Prepared For:
MICHAEL SELWAY

The purpose of this report is to identify the investment strengths and weaknesses that have been revealed by your answers to the Investment I.Q. Questionnaire, and to suggest ways you can refine and improve on your current investment practices.

The analysis -- and recommendations -- are based on the winning investment habits of Master Investors like Warren Buffett and George Soros. So the questionnaire, in effect, compares your investment practices to those of the masters -- as the chart above graphically displays.

The first section lists your major strengths and weaknesses; and the final section makes recommendations that, if you follow them, should result in improved investment performance.

To Summarize:

By and large, you are getting the investment results you desire
You have some of the strengths of highly successful investors -- but several weaknesses that are holding you backYou have many of the strengths of highly successful investors
Investing is often a source of anxiety for you. If you follow the recommendations listed in the final section you should be able to reduce that anxiety considerably
Your Investment Strengths

You make your investment decisions independently

The successful investor generates his own investment ideas based on his own research. Furthermore, he restricts his investing activities to what he knows and understands. The result: he makes his decisions based on FACTS that are personally known to and understood by him.

The investor who bases his investment decisions on something he reads in the newspaper, the opinions of friends, follows some tip from his broker or another investment adviser can never be wholly sure that he's doing the right thing.

By coming to your investment decisions independently, you are following in the footsteps of the Master Investor. This does not mean you should not get ideas from other people. There are always more sources of investment ideas than you could possibly develop entirely on your own. What is important is that you do your own, independent research and evaluation before making a decision to invest regardless of where the initial impetus originally came from.

Since you're following this practice, you've probably already realized that 'good' investment ideas that everybody else knows about aren't really much good at all.

You are clear about your investment goals

The Master Investor's primary focus is the process of investment. The profits he expects to make, while very important, are actually secondary. A major secret of his success is that he enjoys the hunt, the process of discovering new investment opportunities that meet his criteria.

Investment profits are a means to some other goal, not an end in themselves. So perhaps like Warren Buffett, for you investing is just plain fun. Or maybe your primary goals are security or independence, or similar objectives that your investing helps you achieve. Paradoxically, once you have discovered them -- if you have not already -- your investing will make you more money when profits are no longer your primary aim.

Needs Some Improvement

You can learn more from your mistakes

One of the most important habits the Master Investor follows religiously is that whenever he makes a mistake he goes over everything he did, how he came to his decision, how he executed it, whether he monitored his investment properly and so on to find out what he did wrong...so he won't do it again.

Occasionally he might be unable to uncover any evidence that suggests he did not follow all his rules. If this happens, he will try and figure out if there's been some change in the market that means his investment approach is no longer working, or needs to be modified in some way. Or looks into himself to see if, perhaps, he has changed in some way that he had failed to recognize. Or he may realize that he's been under stress and should take some action to minimize that.

It appears that much of the time -- but not all the time -- you have a similar attitude towards learning from your mistakes.

Most people prefer not to dwell on their mistakes and so are fated to repeat them.

Not you. But it will pay you to analyze your mistakes more rigorously and consistently than you have in the past. The result will be to turn your mistakes into learning experiences.

For example, set aside a fixed time once a week (or if you are a day trader, perhaps once a day) to review any mistakes you may have made, no matter how small they appear to be. Being willing to be self-critical is a powerful practice that will enable you to continuously refine your method of investing.

You sometimes have trouble 'pulling the trigger'

When the Master Investor has made a decision to buy and sell, he acts immediately. The process of phoning his broker has much emotional significance to him as when you phone a restaurant to make a dinner reservation.

When you have made an investment decision, however, you sometimes have difficulty 'pulling the trigger.'

There have probably been occasions when you've identified an opportunity but missed it -- because the price zoomed while you hesitated. Or agonized over when to take a profit. And, perhaps, occasionally, you were too tentative: buying only a small amount when you 'knew' you should buy more.

When this happens, it is an indication that you are not always sure about what you are doing.

So if you were to look back over your past investment decisions and compare the times when you acted immediately and the times when you agonized over it, you will probably find that the times when you procrastinated were the times when you weren't really sure you were doing the right thing.

From this exercise you might even find that the investments you made when you acted instantly were the ones you really understood. So -- assuming of course that your confidence in what you were doing was not misplaced -- you might discover your investment niche; and were you to specialize in just these kinds of investments, you will probably find that you'll consistently make money.

Acting instantly once you've made an investment decision -- when your confidence comes from really knowing what you're doing -- is a trait that really separates the investment sheep from the investment goats.

You should take a longer-term view

The Master Investor has realized that the key to success is to maximize the annual rate at which his capital compounds.

Taxes and other transactions costs have a direct impact on that annual rate of return.

By minimizing such costs, he can increase the 'magic of compound interest' by several percent per year -- without making an investment of any kind.

It appears that you may be overlooking the significance of transaction costs. Transactions costs eat into your capital, especially for the more active trader.

Say you have $100,000 and you can shave your transaction costs by 0.5%. That's $500. Chickenfeed, right? Well, if you are averaging 15% return on your capital every year, in 20 years that extra $500 per year compounds to $58,900. At 20%, it grows to $112,000. That's serious money and it shows how a tiny savings can balloon.

In this example, just by making a change in a seemingly insignificant detail you can add an extra 50% to 100% to your net worth without making a single investment decision.

The effect of taxes can be far greater. So the Master Investor focuses on his after-tax return. Both Buffett and Soros have added hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars to their net worth simply by making their investment strategies tax-efficient. You should follow their example and maximize the amount of your capital and income that can compound pre-tax.

Like every other aspect of investment process, the arrangements you have made should be reviewed periodically. Continued competition in the brokerage industry, for example, may result in lower commissions becoming available. And tax laws are continually changing.

 

[Julia]

Julia,

It sounds like you don't have a plan with steps on selling to follow.

Read some systems development books and trade the plan.

Snake

Hi Snake,

Do you have a plan which ensures you are always able to pick the peak of any stock you hold and exit accordingly? If so, I'd love to know about it as this is the weakness I described.

Cheers
Julia

 

[Julia]

Thanks Julia - that killed a few minutes and made me think about myself!!

I learnt that I need to know more about computers, as I can't post the chart they sent me!!!
How did the last poster do it?

Investment IQ Report Prepared For: Don't know how to post the chart!! I got 79.9%
To Summarize:

By and large, you are getting the investment results you desire
You have many of the strengths of highly successful investors
You are almost always calm and considered when implementing investment decisions -- and indeed, you are probably reasonably satisfied with your

performance under pressure

Hi Canny

I've had the same difficulty in trying to post something from a website and had assumed it had something to do with copyright, but that can't be right as Crash was able to do it. Can anyone enlighten us?

Thanks for posting some of your "results". I received the same initial comments (so perhaps this is a standard response to make us feel OK)
but then it went on to point out my weakness re exit points.

Can a few other people do the test, even if just to see if we all receive some degree of sameness in the "results"

If that is the case, unless we are all pretty much the same in our investing approach, one would have to be less than impressed with what at first impression seemed like a reasonable questionnaire.

Julia

 

[michael_selway]

Thanks Julia - that killed a few minutes and made me think about myself!!

I learnt that I need to know more about computers, as I can't post the chart they sent me!!!
How did the last poster do it?

Investment IQ Report Prepared For: Don't know how to post the chart!! I got 79.9%
To Summarize:

By and large, you are getting the investment results you desire
You have many of the strengths of highly successful investors
You are almost always calm and considered when implementing investment decisions -- and indeed, you are probably reasonably satisfied with your performance under pressure

you can either attach it

or u can upload it to http://imageshack.us , get the direct url and post it here using the code, Eg.

------------------------------------------------------------

Your Investment Weaknesses

You lack a consistent investment focus

It seems evident from your answers that you are not clear about the kinds of investments that work for you -- and those that don't.

The Master Investor has clearly defined his 'circle of competence.' This means that he has drawn, so to speak, a circle in the sand. Within that circle are the investments and investment methods he understands. Outside that circle are investment categories he knows little or nothing about.

The Master Investor's edge, his 'competitive advantage,' comes from being crystal clear about where that line is drawn; and making investments only within his circle. As a result, he will only buy an investment he understands. And he makes a point of learning as much as possible about the kinds of investments within his circle of competence.

In other words, he specializes. Even investment 'whales' like Warren Buffett and George Soros occupy a tiny niche in the multi-trillion dollar investment marketplace.

By the same token, investments that are not in his circle of competence simply do not interest him. He just ignores them.

You have yet to make this distinction.

It's crucial to define your circle of competence as that's the only way you can consistently find investments which are, in Warren Buffett's words, 'high probability events.' This means: investments with the prospect of a substantial profit and a small to negligible risk of loss.

And to emulate the Master Investor, it's imperative that you avoid entirely investments you do not understand, no matter how appealing they may seem. Quite probably, if you think about it, you will realize that this has been a major cause of past investment losses.

To improve your investment results, it's essential that you define your circle of competence and clarify your investment criteria; and there are some suggestions you are urged to consider in the last section.

You have not developed a fully-fledged search strategy

For too many investors, the most important actions are the buying and selling of an investment. The reality is quite different: the Master Investor spends the majority of his time looking for investments that meet his criteria. Buying and selling are actions that take but moments.

The Master Investor has, of course, clarified his investment criteria so he knows exactly what kind of investment he's looking for.

It's a tautology, but it's worth emphasizing: only if you have defined your investment criteria can you develop a search strategy to find investments that meet them.

But it seems that you don't really have a search strategy, and the probable reason is that you have not clarified your investment criteria.

The act of defining them often makes the search process obvious. So that is the place to start.

And you'll find some suggestions that will rectify that situation at the end of this report.

You don't have an exit strategy

The Master Investor has developed a very clear exit strategy. Before he even buys an investment, he knows exactly what would cause him to sell it. His rules for selling grow directly from his reasons for buying. In other words: from his investment criteria.

From your responses to the questionnaire it is evident that taking profits (or cutting losses) can be a source of great stress and anxiety for you. The probable cause is that you have not clarified your investment criteria.

Without proper investment criteria, it's simply impossible to have a fully-developed exit strategy. To put it another way: if you don't know why you are buying an investment, how can you know when to sell it.

As suggested above, it's essential that you first define your circle of competence and clarify your investment criteria and only then will you be in the position to create a fully-developed exit strategy.

Recommendations

It appears that, by and large, you are getting the investment results you desire.

Even so, there is always some aspect of your investment approach that can be improved, especially if you developed it by trial and error.

By going through the following exercises and using them as a gauge to judge your current practices you're bound to find something that can be further refined.

1. Check the clarity of your investment goals

A driving force behind the Master Investor's success is his investment goals. And he is, of course, very clear about what they are.

So it's important that you are also very clear about yours. Even if you feel that you have that clarity, it pays to review them from time to time. Simply ask yourself: WHY are you investing, what's your purpose?

Paradoxical as it may seem, your purpose in investing is NOT to make money. Making money is the means to your ultimate goal. For example, your goal might be security. If it is, then losing money will jeopardize its achievement.

If profit is your only investment objective, you'll find -- strange as it may seem -- that those profits will improve when you discover and focus on your underlying 'higher' goal.

2. Refine your investment focus

The successful investor specializes. He clearly defines his circle of competence and stays there. He doesn't go venturing into unknown territory. The Master Investor goes one step further: he occupies a tiny niche and learns everything there is to know about it.

For success, it's essential that you have a similarly narrow focus. One way to improve your investment results is to refine your 'circle of competence.'

Simply ask yourself the following questions:

What am I interested in? What class of investments and what aspects of investing fascinate me?
What do I know now?
What would I like to know and be willing to learn?
This will help you 'draw the line' (if you have not already done so) between what you know (or are willing to learn) and what you don't know.

Finally, by only making investments inside your circle of competence, you will follow the Master Investor in only investing in what you understand.

And as markets change -- and as you change -- it's worth revisiting these questions once a year or so to keep yourself on track; and to see if there are any changes you need to make.

3. Refine your investment criteria

Your investment criteria are all the reasons that go into your decision to purchase an individual investment.

Here are two processes that can help to both refine your investment criteria and pinpoint any weaknesses in your investment methodology:

1. Go through your past investments and separate them into two 'piles,' the winners and the losers. For each category, analyze why you lost money or why you made a profit. What did you do differently? For the winners, what did you do that was the same? Answering these questions should lead you to focus on what, in the past, you've done RIGHT.

2. Go back over previous investments and write down all the reasons why you bought them. Whenever you make a new investment, again, write your reasons down so that you can refer to them easily in the future. At the same time -- that is, BEFORE you make the investment -- write down exactly what factors would cause you to take either a profit or a loss.

The successful investor is ruthless when it comes to taking losses -- and one reason is that he knows before he buys exactly what factors would cause him to sell.

This process effectively forces you to hone your criteria, and will also help make your own thinking processes clearer to you.

Keeping written records of your reasons for making each of your investments will help you continually refine and improve your investment methodology.

4. Is your investment system complete?

 

[It's Snake Pliskin]

Hi Snake,

Do you have a plan which ensures you are always able to pick the peak of any stock you hold and exit accordingly? If so, I'd love to know about it as this is the weakness I described.

Cheers
Julia

Julia,

I have at this stage put some time into my plan in order to know where I stand before I trade a stock. I have selling and stoploss rules that come before anything to do with buying - so basically I know when I'm selling a stock before I decide to buy a stock. However, I don't know what price I will be selling at until it happens - it seems to be a paradox.

There is nothing exciting with my exits - pretty standard stuff, but I use a 10 day and 35 day moving average crossover with oscillators: RSI and Stochastics. A larger, say 100 - 200 day moving average can be of help too.

My plan doesn't allow me to pick the peak before it drops. It does, however, protects profits by utilising a trailing stop - as the price increases so does the trailing stop. Setting stops is an involved topic and requires much study and testing I believe. It is something I'm still working on and will continue to work on - hopefully Nick's book will be of value here.

Importantly, this suits me and may appear flawed to others, but that's the beauty of trading. It must suit the trader.

A good book to read would be Louise Bedford's Trading secrets, and then move on to Van Tharp's book as she suggests. Read other books beyond that.

cheers
Snake

 

[tech/a]

Interesting test.

 

[Julia]

Julia,

I have at this stage put some time into my plan in order to know where I stand before I trade a stock. I have selling and stoploss rules that come before anything to do with buying - so basically I know when I'm selling a stock before I decide to buy a stock. However, I don't know what price I will be selling at until it happens - it seems to be a paradox.

There is nothing exciting with my exits - pretty standard stuff, but I use a 10 day and 35 day moving average crossover with oscillators: RSI and Stochastics. A larger, say 100 - 200 day moving average can be of help too.

My plan doesn't allow me to pick the peak before it drops. It does, however, protects profits by utilising a trailing stop - as the price increases so does the trailing stop. Setting stops is an involved topic and requires much study and testing I believe. It is something I'm still working on and will continue to work on - hopefully Nick's book will be of value here.

Importantly, this suits me and may appear flawed to others, but that's the beauty of trading. It must suit the trader.

A good book to read would be Louise Bedford's Trading secrets, and then move on to Van Tharp's book as she suggests. Read other books beyond that.

cheers
Snake

Hi Snake,

Thanks for explaining what you do. Yes, I understand about trailing stop losses, but that (and probably nothing ) doesn't preclude selling too early or hanging on in the expectation of a continuing rise.

Here is an example I had recently: I had a holding of 2000 Record Investment Ltd. (RCD), bought in October 2004 at $4.96. Various broker sources suggested they were fully valued at about $7.70. So I decided to take some profits and sold 1000 end of October 2005 (OK re CGT). However they continued to rise and obviously I regretted selling half. Purchased 1000 back again 28.11.05 at $8.40. They are continuing to rise, given small fluctuations, but I have needlessly incurred extra costs from buying back shares at higher price plus brokerage and GST in both directions.

I doubt that there is any plan which will completely cope with this sort of situation. If there were, we'd all be much richer than we are I suppose.

Cheers
Julia

 

[tech/a]

Julia.

There will always be instances where you'll be damned if you do and damned when you dont.

To be able to sell at the exact peak and buy at the exact trough will rarely happen. Picking up the meat or 80% of the middle is the main aim.

 

[michael_selway]

Hi Snake,

Thanks for explaining what you do. Yes, I understand about trailing stop losses, but that (and probably nothing ) doesn't preclude selling too early or hanging on in the expectation of a continuing rise.

Here is an example I had recently: I had a holding of 2000 Record Investment Ltd. (RCD), bought in October 2004 at $4.96. Various broker sources suggested they were fully valued at about $7.70. So I decided to take some profits and sold 1000 end of October 2005 (OK re CGT). However they continued to rise and obviously I regretted selling half. Purchased 1000 back again 28.11.05 at $8.40. They are continuing to rise, given small fluctuations, but I have needlessly incurred extra costs from buying back shares at higher price plus brokerage and GST in both directions.

I doubt that there is any plan which will completely cope with this sort of situation. If there were, we'd all be much richer than we are I suppose.

Cheers
Julia

Actually thats a fundamental error you have imo. Its all about opportunity. Fine you sold half to take profits which is ok (since u think its fully valued, but still may go up a bit).

However why would you buy it back? isnt there more better opportunies u coudl do with the money out there as at 28/11/05, than buying RCB which u already have? What about other stocks u dont currently have which may have more of a potential at that point in time?

Sometimes i disagree with the idea of "topping up", unless theres absolutely no other "good" stocks left to buy that i dont currently own.

What your others opinions?

 

[It's Snake Pliskin]

Hi Snake,

Thanks for explaining what you do. Yes, I understand about trailing stop losses, but that (and probably nothing ) doesn't preclude selling too early or hanging on in the expectation of a continuing rise.

Here is an example I had recently: I had a holding of 2000 Record Investment Ltd. (RCD), bought in October 2004 at $4.96. Various broker sources suggested they were fully valued at about $7.70. So I decided to take some profits and sold 1000 end of October 2005 (OK re CGT). However they continued to rise and obviously I regretted selling half. Purchased 1000 back again 28.11.05 at $8.40. They are continuing to rise, given small fluctuations, but I have needlessly incurred extra costs from buying back shares at higher price plus brokerage and GST in both directions.

I doubt that there is any plan which will completely cope with this sort of situation. If there were, we'd all be much richer than we are I suppose.

Cheers
Julia

Julia,

I agree with Michael Selway and Tech.

No one can pick the top, but having a system that protects profits is the key. The trade you highlighted looks as though it was a fundamental trade and you may not have had a technical stoploss to do the job for you.

You said you decided to take some profits. A concrete trading plan doesn't let you decide - discretion - in my opinion, if so one's plan would be a waste of space. Broker reports don't account for much if you are using technical indicators to tell you when - I don't take too much notice of reports now.

You could try using the fundamentals to shortlist stocks and use technical indicators to time the buy and sell.

I like tech's point of picking up the meat! You don't need the scraps - that's where people get burnt.

Snake

 

[Julia]

Actually thats a fundamental error you have imo. Its all about opportunity. Fine you sold half to take profits which is ok (since u think its fully valued, but still may go up a bit).

However why would you buy it back? isnt there more better opportunies u coudl do with the money out there as at 28/11/05, than buying RCB which u already have? What about other stocks u dont currently have which may have more of a potential at that point in time?

Sometimes i disagree with the idea of "topping up", unless theres absolutely no other "good" stocks left to buy that i dont currently own.

What your others opinions?

The reason I bought it back is that I regretted selling it. (I can hear you blokes out there sighing and saying "bloody women!".) This is something I've never done before but on honest reflection realised I had made a mistake. I am quite happy to admit the mistake and correct it by buying more shares.

Weren't there other shares at the time that I thought had better potential?
No. With the exception of very speculative ones which don't interest me these days.

Why did I buy more of RCD? Partly because I am trying to consolidate my portfolio which contains too many stocks, and partly because I believe the company and its prospects deserve that percentage allocation of my investing capital.

I have since more than recovered the interim loss by the increase in the share price so am happy.

I agree that I would benefit from some better understanding of a technical approach, though essentially being a fundamental investor.

However, (and this should be a separate thread if we pursue it), it would be interesting to see two identical portfolios of, say, 20 stocks, and look at the results of both at the end of a year or perhaps two when one is traded purely on the basis of fundamentals and one purely by technical analysis.

Julia

 

[tech/a]

However, (and this should be a separate thread if we pursue it), it would be interesting to see two identical portfolios of, say, 20 stocks, and look at the results of both at the end of a year or perhaps two when one is traded purely on the basis of fundamentals and one purely by technical analysis.

Julia

Julia.

Your implying that one will outperform the other.
Your also suggesting that its analysis that is responsible for profits.

Technical analysis can trade a portfolio in dozens of ways.
Fundamental analysis should also be more than buy and hold.

Until there is a complete understanding of how profits are derived then there is no way that one can hone those profits (become more profitable).

What you have done Julia is perfectly valid and what has been suggested as alternatives are also perfectly valid.The best option can only be known in hindsite.
However options of what to do with this or any trade during it should be put in place.
This is easier to do technically but not impossible fundamentally.

 

[Knobby22]

Julia

Buying back in showed strength of purpose. Recognising a mistake and acting is what makes a good investor. It took me a while to do it and I can still improve.

I have read the book by the guy who did this quiz and really enjoyed it.
As a person who buys of fundamental analysis I really enjoyed the way Soros works which is sort of both fundamental and technical.

I know my biggest weaknesses are that when I have made a decision to buy then I often don't buy as many as I should and kick myself later e.g. I bought a few CSL shares at $14 and really should have bought as many as I could, like Buffett would have. I did the same with Woodside, buying at $15. At least I did the right thing with Oxiana.

My second weakness is that I can have too many stocks and have trouble spending adequate time on them. This caused me a big loss on one of them about 2 years ago. I had twenty two stocks at that stage.
I am correcting this slowly, looking for reasons to leave an investment. I think twelve is enough for me.

I suppose the secret is to know exactly why you are buying and then you will know when selling should take place. This can be influenced by the shareprice going up or down creating doubts. I think I am getting good at ignoring short term fluctuations.

If we compared our holdings to a technical trader, we have the advantage of less trades meaning lower costs (taxes and trading fees) and more time.
That said, the best traders can really do well and be hard to catch in performance, though I like to think I beat 80% of them. It's not that hard to beat the fund mangers though, as long as I beat them I feel I am investing OK.

I am finding it hard to get a good stock to buy at present. Are you finding this also?

 

[mit]

I got 91.2% so why aren't I rich . Even though he basically a fundamental investor any TA trader would do well as the entries, exits and position sizes are very clear cut.

My weakness according to the report is a fear of pulling the trigger because I don't buy immediately. Depends on their definition of immediately as I don't buy on open but usually near close.

MIT