- Joined
- 6 June 2006
- Posts
- 409
- Reactions
- 0
Snake Pliskin said:It`s part of the mindset one must have: don`t listen to crap.
Well if it's entertainment that you're looking for, my mistake, you have undoubtably found it.
Regarding beating the market, you think beating the market is hard, yet earning an income from the market is easy, or easier..............
yes, time is on your side right?As regards my *system* time will tell.
Without that accountability, I could claim anything I choose, and who's to gainsay me?.....................This is the situation currently with this debate, discussion..........we have multiple people claiming all sorts of results, but not a shred of accountability.
If you are happy with that situation, then jog on.....................
I personally would like to see some evidence of profitability if profitability is claimed. If it is a discussion on *theory* that's fine, I enjoy discussing theory as much as the next person.
Yabbut this is not Graham or Buffet. They do not diversify, they concentrate.Realist said:AMP made big losses in 1998 and 1999 I would not have bought them. I do not buy companies that make losses, simple as that.
And if I had bought earlier and the Fundamentals changed so dramatically. I would have sold them
But if I held them over the whole time I'd be only down a bit after dividends anyway. They are down about a 3rd now.
Sure I could buy shares and they go belly up, I diversify widely for this very reason. I'd lose 8% at most of my total capital, and claim that back against a gain - reducing my losses further.
Yabbut this is not Graham or Buffet. They do not diversify, they concentrate.
As I said don`t listen to the crap.
I also haven't seen any claims of trades in real time, live or whatever else you want to call them.....I've only seen people make claims after they allegedly made a trade, albeit only by a few mins in some case but imo whether it is only a few mins or 6 hrs it makes no difference because anyone with access to the course of sales can look up a historical profitable entry point in the c.o.s and claim it is theirs and since you have no way of knowing who is actually siting at the keyboard at any particular time there is no way of verifying with 100% certainty whether a chatter's claim is true or not.
I think they'd recommend that you buy into an index fundRealist said:Correct!! Buffett does concentrate and specialise. And I do not.
I'm no Warren Buffett, I'm not as smart as him, I don't do the research and have the knowledge he has. I know my weaknesses.
Both Graham and Buffett would recommend I diversify.
For instance, what made you decide to buy BHP recently instead of WOW?
eddievanhalen said:This thread cracks me up and was why (other than lack of time) I give many forums a wide berth - I'm not sure whether to laugh or cry actually. We have a whole lot of one-upmanship here dominated by traders who refuse to believe that anyone has an approach that produces "mega returns" just because they cannot manage it themselves.
I am not going to even try and make any claims myself , but let's just say that I am in contact with traders all day every day, have seen trading statements/tax returns of my closer trading friends.
I'm not going to get myself into an argument with the usual suspects here but let me say that I talk from some experience - I in fact used to be a one eyed Buffet fan who believed that the returns he has produced over a very long period (say 20-25% pa ) were the ultimate and that technical analysis was akin to palm reading.
Over the years my opinions have changed.
Let me just make a few points to those who refuse to believe that there are possibilities beyond what their closed minds and I will leave it at that. I have no wish and no need to get into a philosophical argument or to prove anything to anyone other than myself. I get the feeling Bunyip is a bit the same and for mine I'd be guessing he's the most likely here to be making spectacular returns.
My points as follows:
-most beginning traders suffer from undercapitlisation and are not aware of what is possible until they trade more significant amounts (myself included).
- the best traders I know have an open mind and use both TA and FA.
- the best traders I know are "discretionary" and have a system based upon experience and some concrete principles which cannot be punched into a system tester and "proven"
- there ARE a few traders who are making 50,60,70,80,90% returns on large sums of money. Quite obviously making 80% pa on billions is nigh on impossible and there must be diminishing returns as you get larger or we'd have new trading billionaires all the time. That's not to say that there's not traders out there making 80% pa on 6 and 7 figure sums - there are!!
- people turning over large amounts in the market neither have the time nor inclination to try and compete with others and prove themselves. I personally trade AND invest.........turn over in excess of $1m/month most months. Do you think I could be stuffed posting my trades (around 70 positions currently) and trying to prove myself to some people on the internet I don't know. I actually spend a lot of time helping other traders with general queries and am all for pointing people in the right direction but as far as trying to explain my system and prove it to everyone?? Couldn't be bothered and it's actually nigh on impossible to teach a discretionary system anyway unless you sit with someone and "mentor " them for months on end. You can however teach some very important general principles that make up that system as Bunyip has indicated.
- most of the traders making really big money from the markets do it full time. TechA does a fantastic job using a low maintainence system - those who wish to do significantly better can expect to spend 40-60 hrs a week on it.
- I am aware of the actual trading results of some of the overexposed seminar promoters out there and let's just say that most of their money must come from books and seminars.
That's my piece - make of it what you will. I have made no claims about my own results - I have been making a living from the market from the age of 28 (currently 32) and have no need to prove myself to anyone.
The only reason I bothered posting was to try and get across to some of those with a more open mind that YES .......a very small minority are making a killing from the markets. If you open your mind , forget conventional wisdom about what is possible and just get in there and try and come up with some unique ideas then you might just be one of them
The only way to seriously outperform everyone else is to do something else.
Over and out
Ed
eddievanhalen said:Over the years my opinions have changed.
The only way to seriously outperform everyone else is to do something everyone else isn't doing.
All absolutely true. My plan does all of this and so do I. So far, the plan (and I) are performing to (backtested) specification.bunyip said:Realise that you don't need to know much in order to profit consistently from the market. Too much information and knowledge can be detrimental to trading results. There's a colossal amount of information out there, both technical and fundamental.
Most of it is pretty damned useless in my experience.
The important things in trading are...
* Identify strong trends.
* Have one or two simple setups to signal an entry into these strong trends.
* Use stops and money management to strictly control your losses.
* Have an exit strategy that's designed to keep you in the winning trades as long as they keep performing well, and take you out when the party is over.
In other words, keep it simple and be consistent.
Bunyip
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?