Realist
Billie Jean is not my lover
- Joined
- 1 June 2006
- Posts
- 2,057
- Reactions
- 3
Realist said:Serious question. Does that manufacturing plant still exist Wayne?
Or has it closed down, because it is cheaper to import the goods from China than manufacture them here?
Their costs would be much lower of course.
High overheads will get you eventually.
Realist said:Wayne,
How would you suggest someone starts to get into trading then?
What should be the steps...
Books?
Seminars? (or save your money and stay away)
Set up a commsec account?
Free evaluations of Ezytrade or whatever it's called?
Buy a few shares magazines and study teh paper, internet etc.
Create a plan and backtest it?
Paper trade for a while?
Then trade with small amounts on what you perceive to be "certain" trades?
Learn from your success and mistakes?
Constantly improve your plan and methodology?
I don't know, I'm just guessing, is that about right?
One happy punter is single mum Cydney O'Sullivan, who started out developing property, but found it was too hard to make money - and to keep it, when she did.
"I decided to try share traing and I absolutely loved it", said the Kenthurst resident, who makes about 100 trades a month on E*Trade.
If you are a successful trader, the tax system is quite geared towards investors. You can keep more of the money you make," she said.
"In business, or in being a real estate investor...it's very difficult to make a profit"
Snake Pliskin said:Most follow brokers and analysts opinions thoough.
dallee said:Seeing as this is sitting in the beginners' thread, can I ask what if for argument's sake we say that technical analysis provides the greater returns, but the investor is not confident/competent enough to use it and is happy with the returns from some solid research and a more conservative buy-and-hold strategy that produces good dividends but a slower capital growth. Isn't it better to be in the market in this capacity than not at all?
Would I, for example, be foolish to gear into some blue chip stocks, watch the market to the best of my ability, make a few mistakes along the way but hopefully come out on top in the end; or, if this is the limit of my current abilities, salary sacrifice into super with the knowledge someone else has the expertise to make it work? Although the second option doesn't sound as much fun.
Realist said:Wayne,
How would you suggest someone starts to get into trading then?
What should be the steps...
Books?
Seminars? (or save your money and stay away)
Set up a commsec account?
Free evaluations of Ezytrade or whatever it's called?
Buy a few shares magazines and study teh paper, internet etc.
Create a plan and backtest it?
Paper trade for a while?
Then trade with small amounts on what you perceive to be "certain" trades?
Learn from your success and mistakes?
Constantly improve your plan and methodology?
I don't know, I'm just guessing, is that about right?
professor_frink said:The first three words of that article pretty well sum it up.
Joe Blow said:Yes, but how long will she be a 'happy' punter I wonder.
A WHOPPING 145,000 Australians have set up share trading accounts in the past year, the highest number since the dot-com boom.
Of these, 91,000 had never traded a share before.
wayneL said:Nicks book/course would set anyone on the right track IMO.
Tech/A and others have some fantastic material on this site on precisely this subject, that go into great depth... my little corner is derivatives mainly, so others have better answers there.
Cheers
Of these, 91,000 had never traded a share before.
wayneL said:Oh My!!!
The top is in folks!
wayneL said:Oh My!!!
The top is in folks!
wayneL said:Oh My!!!
The top is in folks!
No company is a guaranteed safe investment. No business is guaranteed to be around for 30 years. No brand is invincible.
professor_frink said:Wonder how many of them were buying AUM as an "investment" last week
Realist said:Indeed.
When single mums and 91,000 other completly new punters jump in and some of them start trading over 100 times a month it is time to be extra careful.
I read that article and thought oh boy I better be carefull, I'll sit and watch for a while (not sell) and buying property is sounding better all the time.
If punters are leaving property to "invest" I should do the opposite.
Will the next significant downturn in the ASX be the signal to buy proprty do you think? Punters will no doubt follow later once they've been stung sufficiently trading.
wayneL said:I'm waiting for the capitulation selloff in property before I go anywhere near it. If there is one area where I believe in "Buffettology" is property.
Buy value!
We are a freakin' long way from anything that even resembles value in the property market IMO( the res. market anyway) !
Realist said:Well, I can't see a capitulation happening in the near future.
The Aussie economy is doing well, recent tax cuts are fairly significant, and we've had falling house prices for the past 3 years (in Sydney), along with rising rents.
Residential poperty in Sydney is getting closer to fair value I think.
Another 5% fall in Sydney over the next year, a 0.5% increase in interest rates, and a 10% rise in rents to me would signal an opportunity to look to buy again.
You of course would want to be fussy and bargain damn hard to get a good deal.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?