Realist
Billie Jean is not my lover
- Joined
- 1 June 2006
- Posts
- 2,057
- Reactions
- 3
eddievanhalen said:I realise I am never going to win an argument with you Realist: but you're looking at things selectively. If you want to try and pick bottoms in falling stocks as a profession then good luck - the point about CMI and PBB is that purely in PER terms they have looked cheap all the way down over the last year or so. I'm not talking the last few weeks - everything has bounced the last few weeks.
PRG looks a decent company to me and is certainly not on the nose in sentiment terms so I wouldn't try and convince you not to buy it. It's not enough of a stand out for me though. I think overall you're a bit too focussed on ratios without looking at the growth potential though.
Is that wrong? should I be trying to predict the future?
Snake Pliskin said:Realist,
So you are fundamental and believe investing is long term but seem to be influenced by the short term moves that theoretically you cannot realise until after 1 year to receive a tax benefit for the hassle of buying into the company.
Sorry I just don`t understand your logic.
My question for you:
If the stock dictates how long you hold for, and that may be less than 1 year so no tax benefit; how do you know it is time to get out?
eddievanhalen said:Numerous stocks have bounced >30% and not necessarily because they're any good. In many cases it's because they're junk and got hammered harder than most during the correction. I wouldn't get too focussed on your 30%.
And yes.............all my best investments have involved reading between the lines in company announcements and getting a feel for the growth potential in the near term. There's a big difference between buying cheap and buying cheap growth.
Anyway - I'm outta here for a while again LOL
Ed
Snake, that is the same question I asked before about this theory you can do both TA and FA at once - when you are doing both FA and TA investing at once when do you sell?? what about stop losses? what about tax and compounding - you can;t ahev it all - when do you sell?
Snake Pliskin said:You should have some interest in what the future may bring you. Call it prediction, projection, gambling, goal fullfillment, profit capturing.etc.
eddievanhalen said:I keep coming back but FFS - now you're quoting efficient market theory which Buffett believes is a load of rot and which effectively means that your "poor outlook" companies are fairly valued because the market is efficient.
:
lesm said:Yes, it would be good if Joe or one of the moderators would step in here.
We are now seeing some serious allegations that could give rise to a potential breach of the regulations administered by ASIC.
Gentlemen and others, (as it applies), it might be a good time to get the egos under control, false accusations (in public) may also have repercussions for the accuser, as there is a requirement to produce facts and evidence.
This or any other forum is not necessarily the right place. There are proper avenues.
Realist said:Rod, please list 3 companies now which are good TA and FA purchases.
So I can learn from your expertise..
I'll give you one myself - PRG.... do you agree it is??
Thanks..
eddievanhalen said:Tell all that to the people who bought seemingly cheap companies like HIH and ION with a 10 year outlook.
If you can then maintain your current stance after watching the value of your portfolio halve and see a few of your "cheap" companies go under then I really don't know
RodC said:For my main portfolio I select stocks using a TA system then have a cursory glance at the fundamentals to make sure that the selection is something I'm comfortable with and is a reasonable "fit" with my existing holdings.
Realist said:That is pure trading to me. No investment part whatsoever.
A cursory glance, to see what? What have you seen that has ever stopped you buying?
What does a cursory glance at MTN's fundamentals tell you? or BMN's?
RodC said:Rubbish, used properly TA and FA can complement each other, if you think they only contradict then you really have no idea.
Rod.
I never claimed it wasn't trading.
I did say it was only cursory.
Realist said:Lets make one thing clear - You do not combine both technical and fundamental analysis. You trade and take a cursory look at fundamentals.
Your trading sounds highly weird as well. Not that there is anything wrong with that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?