- Joined
- 5 July 2005
- Posts
- 536
- Reactions
- 1
cuttlefish said:I'd dispute that - often in sideways or bear markets fundamental investing comes to the fore. Just because the market went nowhere, doesn't mean individual stocks went nowhere. Also an investment can do very well without the price of the stock rising.
Think how much even a fundamental investor would make who timed his buys and sells using a simple index filter.
share price does not go up in value at all!!!
mit said:Realist said he has a portfolio of around 20 stocks. With that many stocks it is difficult to outperform the market. If your idea of value was "screamingly cheap" you could make money as you would end up buying in those dips and selling at the peaks, but I would say there has been nothing "screamingly cheap" for a couple of years and those kinds of investors have probably been in cash since 2005.
MIT
tech/a said:A 7% move down and your snaffelled.
Investing for Dividends---Unless you're on a *Free* trade that too is a Phurphy.
Realist I'm sure will explain a *Free* trade for us.
Realist said:In the 1970's I'd have stocked up in the dip in 1975. I'd have been well ahead that decade.
A free trade is a trade that does not cost you anything..
mit said:Not by what you have said about your investing style. If you aren't in cash now,
I can't see why you would be fully invested at the peak of the market and still fully invested at the bottom of the market (probably worse as market precedes the economy by 6 months you would get buy/sell signals at the worst possible times). What would you use to buy the extra shares?
MIT
tech/a said:You know why most people trade fundamentally?
Its because they wont spend the time and effort required to learn how to apply analysis of charts to their trading/investing.
[/B]
Realist said:No way would I ever have 100% of my money in the market ever.
75% at most, 25% as a minimum. Cause you never know.
mit said:So you have 25% of your money doing nothing all of the time? That doesn't make sense.
MIT
Realist said:Bollocks...
Most people do not trade fundamentally.
And secondly those that do get excellent results.
Finally. Most traders lose money.
Realist said:Yep, it is in a CBA 5.4% internet banking account.
To me it makes sense now, to you it will make sense when the market crashes next.
No margin loans either!!
mit said:So why count it?
How will you know you are at the bottom? You might buy your bargains and the market falls another 25%
ooh I can do this ...
Most people do not trade technically
And secondly those that do get excellent results.
Finally. Most fundamental investors lose money.
Ridiculous. Traders (Darryl Guppy, Leon from Tasmania etc.) all admit in their books most traders lose!
tech/a said:Elliot Pundits picked months before the top 5300 pretty impressive.
At the same time they picked the end of the correction to be 4800
Hell thats bloody impressive.
Lucky guess??
BSD said:Personally, I think EW analysis is some of the most laughable quack stuff going.
BSD said:I state my case again, one trade or one year or one manager over 5 years does not make a proven record.
Anyone who has the bulk of their wealth in one strategy/country/asset class/strategy/direction is a gambler.
Realist said:You asked "What would you use to buy the extra shares?"
I just told you cause I have cash - I always have money to buy shares.
If I buy bargains and the market (and my bargains) fall another 25% I would buy more!!
Ridiculous. Traders (Darryl Guppy, Leon from Tasmania etc.) all admit in their books most traders lose!
Explain how someone can buy 20 widely diversified "bargain" shares, in well known companies that make excellent profits and have done so for the past 10 years, pay good dividends, hold them for 30 years, reinvest dividends, buy more when they become very cheap during dips, and sell if they become far too overvalued or start making losses? Explain how they can lose??
It aint possible!! It just aint possible to lose doing that. Even if you tried to you couldn't.
Originally Posted by tech/a
Elliot Pundits picked months before the top 5300 pretty impressive.
At the same time they picked the end of the correction to be 4800
Hell thats bloody impressive.
Lucky guess??
Realist said:Dunno.
But please tell me the next high or low so I can judge myself.
So I can see that you have foresight, not just 20/20 hindsight, everyone has that.
I'm not interested in people predicting the past, I can do that myself.
Tell me the next high or low?
Realist said:Dunno.
But please tell me the next high or low so I can judge myself.
So I can see that you have foresight, not just 20/20 hindsight, everyone has that.
I'm not interested in people predicting the past, I can do that myself.
Tell me the next high or low?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?