- Joined
- 31 May 2006
- Posts
- 1,941
- Reactions
- 2
Realist said:
I'll always sell stocks when they become overvalued. I just sold CDO at $4.35. My first sale in years. Time will tell if that was a good sale.
And yes I will sell stocks if I wanna buy a car, or for tax reasons - in this case both.
Otherwise I hold....
What is your selling strategy? (I admit mine is poor - I rely on buying well not selling well)
Realist said:
I'll always sell stocks when they become overvalued. I just sold CDO at $4.35. My first sale in years. Time will tell if that was a good sale.
And yes I will sell stocks if I wanna buy a car, or for tax reasons - in this case both.
Otherwise I hold....
What is your selling strategy? (I admit mine is poor - I rely on buying well not selling well)
I thought you were going to hold for 30 years, as posted before in this thread.
Realist said:30 years, 30 days what's the difference. :dunno:
The answer is tax of course.
Colorado is not a bluechip, it probably aint worth holding for 30 years, (some) bluechips are..
Had it not been the end of the financial year I would have held - I changed my plan for this stock, and I'll sell a couple of my losers to fix up my portfolio.
I'll sell a couple of losers to offset the tax and maybe buy them back next year at the lower price. tis the smart thing to do I think.
Buy and hold is my basic principal - I of course adjust accordingly. If a company starts to make losses or becomes too overvalued I review accordingly.
Woop dee doo as you say.
Read your posts and look how you have changed in a week. The icon says it all
What is it about CDO that makes it a stock that you wouldn't hold forever.
Also I thought your investment plan is to buy and hold for 30 years, so if CDO isn't a stock you would hold, then why on earth did you buy it in the first place?
Staybaker said:Why all the grilling of Realist on his buys and sells? I don't see others being subjected to this in-depth questioning ...
Cheers, Staybaker.
Realist contended that this made me a "trader" and repeated that he believed in holding on to stocks pretty much for ever (or words to that effect).
But then, he states he has sold Colorado. So it's not altogether unreasonable for other members to suggest that he's changing his mind all the time. That's fine. We all change our minds. I think the difference is the way Realist has "rubbished" approaches other than his own, which in the event appears to be subject to significant change anyway.
Because realist has said, in the past week or two, that his strategy is buying and not selling for 30 years.
Realist said:Only an idiot would buy and hold forever regardless of price - if a share is clearly overvalued you sell.
Traders sell shares because they've gone down. They move onto other "better performing" shares in their eyes.
Investors sell because they've gone up. They bought undervalued shares, the value has been realised - they cash out.
You have bagged a cracker - why not wait to see the offer?
Or a trumping offer?
Why leave early?
Realist said:Cuttlefish, that answers your question. I sold today because I thought it was very close to the best price I could get.
But on what did you base your decision that it was the best price you could get? How did you arrive at that decision?
I worry about brokerage fees and tax more than most here, and I never aim to own any share less than 1 year because of this.
I've got 30 years to wait and thousands of dollars to spend - that's enough for me to wait.
Exactly, he buys them when they are on sale. And holds onto them forever.
Tax, brokerage, effort, time, slippage and stress are 6 reasons why I don't trade.
People like to make easy things difficult. People will not accept that weightloss is that easy, and they will not accept investing is as easy as buying shares in a great company and mostly forgetting about them. If they want to make more pay less initially, wait for a sale.
I have no doubt that anyone who just bought some Woolworths, Fosters, Westfield and BHP shares today and reinvested the dividends and forgot about them for 30 years would end up richer than most, if not all of you on this board.
Your tax is nothing, brokerage nothing, stress nothing, effort and time involved nothing, Price slippage on trades nothing. You don't actually have to do anything. But I have no doubt that none on you will do this
Okay my shares are FGL ($5.55) and WDC ($17.20) - and I recommend you hold them for 30 years minimum and reinvest dividends.
Why buy them? Great companies, great brands, they pay dividends, worldwide market leaders, property and wine is a bit out of fashion at the moment but will surely be back in fashion sooner or later. They are fairly valued. And I firmly believe people (mainly Aussies but worldwide as well) will shop at Westfield and buy beer and wine in 30 years time.
It'll be interesting to see what you recommend.
We'll meet back here on June 17th 2036 to compare. (just kidding )
An investor buys a good company and waits, A trader buys a stock price and watches. There is no in between in my opinion. You can't be a short term investor, you either invest with longterm goals or you trade/speculate - simple as that.
Bear in mind I only buy companies that I see as having an excellent longterm future. No specs whatsoever.
I could not watch the market for a year and be safe my companies arew performing adequately.
I'm not interested in short term income or returns anyway, I've still got 30 odd years of working to do unfortunately.
It went up 25% from where I bought it .... The fact we are 1 week from financial year end and I had only owned it about 3 weeks helped make the decision for me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?