Julia
In Memoriam
- Joined
- 10 May 2005
- Posts
- 16,986
- Reactions
- 1,975
Whether you consider it misogyny or not (and I take your point that it wasn't directed toward all women), it was in the worst possible taste and imo absolutely offensive, particularly "the big red b*x" part.Why is it misogyny? They were only poking fun at Julia Gillard. The remarks were not directed at ALL women.
Whether you consider it misogyny or not (and I take your point that it wasn't directed toward all women), it was in the worst possible taste and imo absolutely offensive, particularly "the big red b*x" part.
If Mal Brough approved that, he has been much reduced in my estimation.
There is plenty of scope for legitimately criticising Julia Gillard without having to resort to such childish smut.
Whether you consider it misogyny or not (and I take your point that it wasn't directed toward all women), it was in the worst possible taste and imo absolutely offensive, particularly "the big red b*x" part.
If Mal Brough approved that, he has been much reduced in my estimation.
There is plenty of scope for legitimately criticising Julia Gillard without having to resort to such childish smut.
Australian politics - 2013 - just pathetic.
Agree completely. They should have known better.Whether you consider it misogyny or not (and I take your point that it wasn't directed toward all women), it was in the worst possible taste and imo absolutely offensive, particularly "the big red b*x" part.
If Mal Brough approved that, he has been much reduced in my estimation.
There is plenty of scope for legitimately criticising Julia Gillard without having to resort to such childish smut.
If Mal Brough approved that, he has been much reduced in my estimation.
.
...
If Mal Brough approved that, he has been much reduced in my estimation....
When was this function? I am getting a whiff of a set up of some kind with this menu business.
(Goes without saying I don't condone this kind of personal insult)
(Goes without saying I don't condone this kind of personal insult)
I don't either. It's really hurtful towards quails and should be referred to the RSPCA.
I am not disagreeing with you. It was in poor taste and dumb. But I AM objecting to the fact that any criticism of Julia Gillard or any expressed dislike of Julia Gillard is labelled as misogyny. I for example dislike her intensely but that does not make me a misogynist or any other male who is like minded towards her.
If he approved it he's an idiot and should go.
We already knew Mal Brough was as thick as **** from the clumsy way he left his fingerprints all over the ashby affair.
I believe the attack was directed at Gillards feminine body parts not just attacking her in a general sense.
this! Gillard claims libs are misogynsts, back fires and now this magical menu appears...
Especially a day after Julia Gillard's abortion and men in blue ties rant.Seems this was from March, why did it just appear now?
I very much doubt he would have seen it and approved it, no one is that stupid.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?