Wysiwyg
Everyone wants money
- Joined
- 8 August 2006
- Posts
- 8,428
- Reactions
- 285
The deciding Risk Score derived from a Risk Matrix by adding Likelihood and Consequence scores is so subjective in that two people will have a different score. A WHS officer sees risk in a different light to the workers doing the work. The WHS officer sees all energy sources as a risk and shall be controlled with Isolation, Lockout and de-energising, draining, testing for dead etc. This is of course absolutely necessary in many cases BUT where I believe they have reduced productivity by up to 20% in our case is by failing in the risk assessment. Failing because all energy sources are deemed a risk and shall be isolated, locked out and de-energised including the equipment workers are required to use for the job. So locks on - sign on, locks off - sign off, locks on - sign on, locks off - sign off all day everyday. Stupid and they have gone too far the other way. End result will be production has dropped off and the upper management wonder why. No worries, everyone's doing less but staying extremely safe. What a joke on themselves.I'm not against WHS (formerly known as OH&S - that's safety in layman's terms) by any means indeed I'm strongly in favour of it. But we've reached the point where certainly some do see that the best way to manage risk is to remove it altogether. In other words, become purely an administrative operation and pay someone else big $ to take on the risk.
Leckies deal with electricity, Fitters deal with mechanical and welders deal with welding. Up top sees human beings as a drag on company profits and numbers need to be reduced at every (created) opportunity.It would, in some ways, improve productivity if maintenance were carrying out their own isolations.
In many companies I've worked for, electrical isolations are carried out by electrical personel.
"the Federal Government warns privatisation and offshoring of critical infrastructure has raised dangers of “sabotage, espionage and coercion"
This was a "premium article" and therefore unreadable by paupers like me, but The Liberals are warning ?
This was a "premium article" and therefore unreadable by paupers like me, but The Liberals are warning ?
They are the silly duffers doing all the privatisation in the first place.
Shees !
One is bad as the other....
I think there's a bigger force at work here and it's starting to become apparent. Rising nationalism, Brexit, Trump etc, government stepping in to save a factory in Victoria and so on. The direction we've been heading in for the past 20+ years seems to be reversing rather quickly it seems.
Our own local sharps.
Is 'our' Smurf a tour guide on this trip ?
That's a rubbish, biased statement. The Libs have sold infrastructure long before the Labor's spending. Take the sale of Telstra. Sold to fund public service pensions. Baird need not have sold the poles and wires.Yeah, like the Labor Party sold of the Commonwealth Bank.
Beattie in Queensland sold off the Golden casket that paid for the hospitals.
One is bad as the other....But in in most cases where the Liberals have sold assets. it was to pay for Labor's overspending and high debt.
Talking about power stations, built on the cheap, have a look at this Smurph.
https://thewest.com.au/business/energy/bluewaters-power-station-suffers-massive-outage-ng-b88373489z
That was built in Collie, which in winter, resembles Tasmania.lol
I would hate to do overnight isolations, there in winter.lol
Mr Watters said Bluewaters had invited the plant’s manufacturer, US conglomerate GE, to diagnose and fix the problem.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?