- Joined
- 14 February 2005
- Posts
- 15,852
- Reactions
- 19,183
the average approval time for a wind farm in NSW is now 3488 days
Approval time frames:
- 3488 days for wind projects (9.5 years)
- 705 days for solar projects (2.5 years)
- 530 days for battery projects (1.5 years)
Well IMO it will be a very expensive discussion for Chris. LolA somewhat crude chart from an incompletely developed source on the IT side hence the warning at the top but it looks correct, I've checked some random intervals and it seems to be working correctly.
So here's the output of Eraring over the past 7 days.
Red line at the top is maximum capacity and the shades of grey show the individual units.
Overall it's running pretty hard apart from afternoons on weekends.
View attachment 172028
between a rock and a hard place springs to mindWell IMO it will be a very expensive discussion for Chris. Lol
First time I've seen it said in any sort of mainstream media but this is the crux of it for three basic reasons:But much longer duration storage will be needed to deal with long winter lulls – rare periods of low wind and sun that last for days, if not weeks.
Daniel Nugent, head of portfolio development at EnergyAustralia, says four-hour batteries “are going to play a much more meaningful role for energy security, keeping the lights on for that evening peak on that hot summer day”.
But for the winter lulls after most coal plants have closed, the electricity market “still looks incredibly tight”, Nugent says.
Turning waste CO2 into power (and other useful stuff).
Have you got something from the shovel Bas? That's your normal go to, for intellectual and scientific content.
How come we are so smart and everyone else in the World is so stupid, they must just stare in awe at our brilliance.
View attachment 172171
The nuts of the issue is that nuclear power is not a good value proposition in terms of energy supply. The figures just don't stack up.
You have shown over many years, there is no point in debating anything about energy with you, that's why I quickly deleted my previous post.Really ? Is that supposed to show how cost effective nuclear power is compared to the current renewable energy alternatives ? Would you like to go deeper into the figures and see which projects are anywhere near completion, how much they are costing and who is picking up the tab ?
The nuts of the issue is that nuclear power is not a good value proposition in terms of energy supply. The figures just don't stack up.
The cartoon makes the point that time and time again the problems with the economics and practicality of nuclear power have been laid out for the Liberal party who simply refuse to acknowledge how badly the figures stack up.
And then they say they want to "discuss" the idea. Crackers really.
Nuclear energy is more expensive than renewables, CSIRO report finds
Renewable energy provides the cheapest source of new energy for Australia, a new draft report from the CSIRO and energy market operator has found.www.abc.net.au
You have shown over many years, there is no point in debating anything about energy with you, that's why I quickly deleted my previous post.
I have explained on numerous occasions how I believe a full renewables grid is possible in Australia, however there is more to our energy usage than just the grid and I've also explained where I feel nuclear can be a sensible option in the energy transition.
I don't see any point in repeating myself endlessly, unlike some others, therefore as we always say time will tell.
Totally agree, hydro is definitely the goto solution at the moment and as you say the only issue is backlash, also hydro will be the eventual backbone of most renewable systems around the World that's a given.I'm unconvinced that nuclear is better than hydro in terms of cost efficiency at this point in time, but the public debate has to be more experts(that aren't flogging their own book) and less politicians and clueless journalists.
FFS, turn the whole thing over to someone like Alan Finkle or other engineers, it's time for politicians to get out of the way.
Thanks... Nah. Your previous post did you no favours SP. Good idea to retract it .You have shown over many years, there is no point in debating anything about energy with you, that's why I quickly deleted my previous post.
.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?