- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 28,947
- Reactions
- 26,790
Agriculture can co-exist with wind farms, solar not so sure.I actually though that once storage was solved, we could do with renewable only and just got a wake up call
When I read a recent report of the Victorian government
View attachment 170908
So you starve or you get power..
Ahhh well, I am sure this is coming from the oil lobby or far right racist white male patriarchs...
Up to 70%...
But that is assuming we still have industry and growth..with cave living and led leds around a fire pit, we might need less than 70% of agricultural land
Reality is a bitch, even worse if you add numbers and real sciences
Solar no, wind..can usually with cattle or livestock but is a big it, road, gates, weed spreading, access...not that it matters cause the wef aim is to stop meat eating for the commoners...Agriculture can co-exist with wind farms, solar not so sure.
Should've said I'll need to confirm that to be sure and my previous comment was based on my understanding only.Tesla I'd have to find out.
I do have a Tesla battery so I could turn off the mains and see what happens with the inverters, I will wait for some sunshine so it will be obvious if they are working or notShould've said I'll need to confirm that to be sure and my previous comment was based on my understanding only.
Have done so and my comment is correct yes, it won't black start an external inverter if it's fully discharged.
Generally speaking, it's only the DC coupled systems, those with a single inverter that has both the solar panels and the battery connected to it, that are able to do that and even there "read the fine print" and know exactly what it can and can't do.
For AC coupled systems, those which are simply added to an existing inverter and solar, you'll need to ensure it's not fully discharged during a loss of supply in order to avoid that situation. But since the solar's working, that's doable if you keep a watch on it and manage consumption accordingly.
There are also some AC coupled systems that are a step below that. They'll power the house from the battery but don't fool the inverter into thinking the grid's there. That being so, there's no production from the solar - once the battery's flat you lose power. That's the lowest tier option basically.
For any such system I strongly recommend reading the fine print and getting in writing from the supplier exactly what it can and can't do.
The real issue is a wake up call, for anyone not blind, as to the size of the challenge knowing that wind farms collapse and burn, have a limited life of course, and spend most of their life idle.as for solar farms, sqr km of them which can be destroyed by a strong hail storm or tornado and will be buried in 15 or 20y...Agriculture can co-exist with wind farms, solar not so sure.
FWIW several of the hydro stations in Tasmania have had sheep roaming around outside for a very long time.Agriculture can co-exist with wind farms, solar not so sure.
The real issue is a wake up call, for anyone not blind, as to the size of the challenge knowing that wind farms collapse and burn, have a limited life of course, and spend most of their life idle.as for solar farms, sqr km of them which can be destroyed by a strong hail storm or tornado and will be buried in 15 or 20y...
Not forgetting that in 2024,in Australia, a solar farm or wind farm with associated battery to allow 24/7 supply will burn more fossil fuel in its lifetime than the same power producing fossil fuel station.
These are hard 2024 facts so when will someone with half a brain , and number and technical literacy, plus balls wake up, do a speech and get the **** up out of that insanity?
Mr @sptrawler and @Smurf1976 , what about this inconvenient truth?
You are technically competent ,aware..
Is it better to play the ostrich than trying to wake up people..our sons and daughters, and their children will pay, as for our own super ... Rol
Not solar, or at least not done in Australia....FWIW several of the hydro stations in Tasmania have had sheep roaming around outside for a very long time.
So long as the switchyard is fenced to keep them away from what would be a highly dangerous environment for them to be in, and it'd be fenced anyway to keep humans out too, they do a pretty good job of wandering around everything else and keeping the grass down. They don't seem to get themselves in trouble and they're not big enough to damage anything even if they did do something silly.
Could probably do the same with solar, use it as grazing land.
@SirRumpole PossiblyWhat should our future be then, nuclear?
I still reckon the best that I have come across for domestic/on farm use is the Sawyers Valley FlywheelShould've said I'll need to confirm that to be sure and my previous comment was based on my understanding only.
Have done so and my comment is correct yes, it won't black start an external inverter if it's fully discharged.
Generally speaking, it's only the DC coupled systems, those with a single inverter that has both the solar panels and the battery connected to it, that are able to do that and even there "read the fine print" and know exactly what it can and can't do.
For AC coupled systems, those which are simply added to an existing inverter and solar, you'll need to ensure it's not fully discharged during a loss of supply in order to avoid that situation. But since the solar's working, that's doable if you keep a watch on it and manage consumption accordingly.
There are also some AC coupled systems that are a step below that. They'll power the house from the battery but don't fool the inverter into thinking the grid's there. That being so, there's no production from the solar - once the battery's flat you lose power. That's the lowest tier option basically.
For any such system I strongly recommend reading the fine print and getting in writing from the supplier exactly what it can and can't do.
Nuclear is too dear overall unless we need nukes..might not be a bad idea but power plant as side effect.What should our future be then, nuclear?
The only thing with Hydro rivers or a decent catchment dam of many many hectares of water are needed. Solar and wind not a real problem, But at the end of the day someone with coconuts will have to come forward and hopefully have a sensible solution to the problem and sooner than later.Nuclear is too dear overall unless we need nukes..might not be a bad idea but power plant as side effect.
Solution?
Some hydro solar etc to add to the mix as it can bring cheap input but up to the point where it becomes a problem.
On existing roof, sheds, etc and domestic housing
Batteries a no go, just anecdotal peak buffer
Baseload in coal, gas for buffering the peaks and when we have absence of solar/wind.
Any pumped hydro for excess solar why not...but should be handled by the solar/wind farm entity, and a pricing to ensure 24/7
More or less what we had a year ago
So 30/40% coal a bit of cheap hydro,solar ,wind where it makes sense, gas and we are cruising.
How many off grid systems have no generator?
So if it is the expected minimum for a house or farm,should not we expect as much for a nation?
My personal view is the approach of massively overbuilding VRE, so that there's enough output even during periods of low wind and sun, isn't workable due to the sheer scale of what's required.Mr @sptrawler and @Smurf1976 , what about this inconvenient truth?
You are technically competent ,aware..
Is it better to play the ostrich than trying to wake up people..our sons and daughters, and their children will pay, as for our own super ... Rol
In the Australian context we've more opportunities than most realise.The only thing with Hydro rivers or a decent catchment dam of many many hectares of water are needed.
There's quite a list of hydro stations that were built as add-ons to dams built for some other purpose (urban water supply or irrigation).I've often wondered could the drinking water dams be used to produce hydro through there outlet pipes that service many far and wide.
but as you know, the devil with H2 is storage, leaky as hell, so the longer you store it , the less remains in the tank and the more leaks thru the pipes and seals..hardly a solution for reserve, but yes a possibility if associated to a solar farm to be burnt overnightMy personal view is the approach of massively overbuilding VRE, so that there's enough output even during periods of low wind and sun, isn't workable due to the sheer scale of what's required.
But, having done the maths, it's doable if VRE is built to scale that works based on normal conditions and the gap under adverse conditions is fixed via storage.
For the storage, batteries certainly have a place but when it comes to dealing with major shortfalls, a week or two of minimal VRE yield during winter, then the only serious options technically at this stage are hydro and hydrogen.
Bearing in mind the latter hasn't really been done anywhere at scale, but the plan is to do it in SA and that's being actively progressed for a 200MW (generating capacity) facility. A key attribute being the hydrogen storage itself is a relatively minor component of the total cost, so scaling that up to increase the running time is very doable.
Thanks smurf, I've been involved in both island system black starts and grid system black starts.
Technical issues can be overcome and as smurf says, it will be a mix of every available source of supply, there is no other option we can't function without electricity.but as you know, the devil with H2 is storage, leaky as hell, so the longer you store it , the less remains in the tank and the more leaks thru the pipes and seals..hardly a solution for reserve, but yes a possibility if associated to a solar farm to be burnt overnight
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?