Normal
I guess the 'point of the argument' is the what makes it a suitable or not suitable ASF subject. As you have said investment implications of climate change is a valid and worthwhile discussion. Having a to/fro argument about what we should(n't) be doing and melting this rising lowering that blah blah is far less relevant, becomes argumentative, divisive... maybe not a ASF topic.But how do you keep them separate. As soon as a slant is applied someone will argue against and it is off...topic.
I guess the 'point of the argument' is the what makes it a suitable or not suitable ASF subject. As you have said investment implications of climate change is a valid and worthwhile discussion. Having a to/fro argument about what we should(n't) be doing and melting this rising lowering that blah blah is far less relevant, becomes argumentative, divisive... maybe not a ASF topic.
But how do you keep them separate. As soon as a slant is applied someone will argue against and it is off...topic.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.
