I second that Ruby. A conscience vote on this would be a good development.I can only hope that the way might be opening up for a positive move forward, and that there is some sensible and mature debate about it.
I second that Ruby. A conscience vote on this would be a good development.
This Bill is not about legalising voluntary euthanasia. It is about giving the Territories the right to legislate on voluntary euthanasia. In effect it would prevent the Parliament from rescinding this legislation as they did with the NT some years ago.
Sure, but it raises the issue again, and Bob Brown has made clear that the Greens intend to promote the consideration of voluntary euthanasia in this new parliament.This Bill is not about legalising voluntary euthanasia. It is about giving the Territories the right to legislate on voluntary euthanasia. In effect it would prevent the Parliament from rescinding this legislation as they did with the NT some years ago.
What will you do eventually if medical staff ask you whether she wants life-sustaining treatment or not when she's approaching dying?
Yes - it's a no go area. She refuses to discuss anything personal. If I am ever given the choice I will say 'yes' to pain relief only and 'no' to life sustaining treatmentPresumably she just refuses to discuss her mortality at all?
Very difficult for you.
What will you do eventually if medical staff ask you whether she wants life-sustaining treatment or not when she's approaching dying?
As long as pain is kept at bay you have to let nature take its course. It is very unfortunate that that can string out a long time.
Yes - it's a no go area. She refuses to discuss anything personal. If I am ever given the choice I will say 'yes' to pain relief only and 'no' to life sustaining treatment
Ruby
Maybe she knows that...and doesn't agree.
This is what I worry about with Euthanasia, it should be the person who is dyings choice.
The situation has not arisen, but I would rather ask for increased pain relief at the possible expense of a longer life. Nature is not taking its course if life is being prolonged by drugs or other technology.
Maybe she knows that...and doesn't agree.
This is what I worry about with Euthanasia, it should be the person who is dyings choice.
Agreed absolutely, Knobby. But what about the situation as with Ruby's mother where she refuses to make her wishes clear?Maybe she knows that...and doesn't agree.
This is what I worry about with Euthanasia, it should be the person who is dyings choice.
Exactly. And that's the entire point of the letter from the emergency physician. Can there be any possible reason for instituting life sustaining treatment in a person who is clearly dying anyway, when those resources could be better used in, say, a young person who will recover?.
However, voluntary euthanasia is not the same as witholding invasive treatment which would prolong a life which no longer has any quality.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?