This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Should shorting be suspended/banned?

Should 'shorting' be banned?

  • Suspended

    Votes: 24 10.3%

  • Banned

    Votes: 69 29.7%

  • No

    Votes: 139 59.9%
  • Total voters
    232
Jump to new

I think the decision makers are just making the right moves to calm down the misinformed or "fools" as some here have described them.
 
nioka said:
As do my replies. Let future history answer the question. Today's trading was on my side but I'm not gloating as there is a long way to go yet.
Click to expand...
Ok... do that.

But answer TH's question before you go.
 


So superannuation companies are conservatively lending the stock that they hold on behalf of current and future retirees to retail punters to play the short selling game. Why doesn't that surprise me.

Why does anyone, ever, trust their money to an investment company is what I find more surprising.

It will be interesting to see if there are any ramifications to the unwinding of this. I can't imagine why anyone would use CFD's in the first place except possibly for short trading so I'd imagine the CFD's providers aren't exactly raking the money in at the moment. I hope the super companies that lent stock to them are comfortable they are good for it if the CFD punters aren't.
 
And here I thought that the true value of a company was determined buy economics, supply, demand and balance sheets - when its obvious that only short sellers really know the true value of a company!

All hail the short sellers.... whats left of them. :
 
Please do not get overly excited and tease the shorters as (in Arnold words) THEY WILL BE BACK.

I am afraid this is the first time a bear market rally has been timed for 30 days.... This will one big sucker rally.
 
mit said:
I remember reading somewhere that nobody has ever shown that shorters were responsible for driving the price of a stock down
Click to expand...

From Business Spectator, today:
"Along those lines, one stock that is likely to fall today is that of the ASX itself; the difference between last week’s trading volumes and this week’s will give us an idea of the extent of activity based on short selling. It won’t be insignificant."

Be worth a look.
 

Being the know it all and smart **** I am that's going to look a little silly. Last week was Futs rollover. We will not get another high volume week like that for another 3 months.

Either he doesn't know that and is the fool that I have always accused him of or he does know that and is deliberately lying.
 
martraci said:
30 days of making some long $$$..then its back to the shorts for $$$ !
Click to expand...

Do you think the "short covering" rally or what ever the excuse is for it going up will last for 30 days?

They have not banned selling for 30 days.................yet
 
lusk said:
Do you think the "short covering" rally or what ever the excuse is for it going up is going to last for 30 days?

They have not banned selling for 30 days.................yet
Click to expand...

Asic announced they will review it in 30 days. So maybe even longer?...

Anyways after 5 days or so we're gonna find a new equilibrium in an artificial market without short sellers. Derivatives traders know this and will just go with the flow. After the allocated period of grace is over, watch out below...
 

I think that the market will get more volatile. As we are not seeing any new trillionaires floating around short sellers are probably losing slightly less as they are winning so you are suddenly reducing liquidity in the market.

If there is the run on a particular share, you wont have short sellers covering their shorts and then possibly no buyers.

Having sad that, I think that Rudd had no option, you don't want to be the only country allowing shorting
 
In the news Kevin Rudd said that banning short selling will stop the manipulation of stocks.

Thank god for that, it will be heaven to deal in a market that is not being manipulated!!
 
it's very easy to get emotional about money. to counter this tendency i like to do the figures, see what the numbers say. which brings me to TH's quote.

it would be interesting to know what % of an XJO fall, in any given period, is actually atributable to shorting VS selling.

any one actually know, or is this a bit of a witch hunt




 
Don't look now, but it looks like those wicked manipulating short sellers have migrated over to NYMEX and are buying up oil.

Evil bast*rds....evil!
 
Robert Gottleibsen says shorting is alright - just got a bit out of hand by the time a trillion dollars was devoted to it.

His article Business Spectator 22 Sept 2008

Shocking the short-sellers.

"A decade or two ago when the hedge fund industry first developed its shorting practices, they served a useful function in the market by smoothing out rises and falls. It enabled investors to protect long investment positions and engage in reasonable trading activity.

But the avalanche of capital into the hedge fund industry became so large – probably around $1 trillion dollars if gearing is included – that they were required to take bigger and bigger risks. And in a bear market the risks had to be on the short selling side, because picking stock winners had become a very tough game.

And so a vicious corporate destruction system was developed to make money and the best targets emerged as global banks, although as we will see below, Australia was not immune.

In the end, when the hedge funds took on the banking system it forced the authorities to act and bring the whole game to an end.

Over time, sensible people will find a way of returning to the original purpose of short selling, but first the vicious games have to end. Meanwhile shorting hedge funds are going to lose a lot of money which will be accelerated by the inevitable runs on their money as those who can get their money out do so.

The vicious practice that the hedge funds devised was to locate a highly leveraged company – it could be any trading company, investment house or even a bank. The funds would undertake incredible research looking for a weakness. Sometimes they would discover that there was a weakness in the way a major shareholder had borrowed to buy stock, so that if the shares were driven low enough, the major shareholder's financiers would sell him out and send the stock down further, enabling the shorters to buy back at huge profits.

Another common scenario was where hedge funds would see that some of the company’s loans had a market capitalisation trigger figure that enabled banks to appoint an administrator if the capitalisation fell below a stated level. The hedge funds would drive the stock down to that level. Sometimes the information the hedge funds used was clearly an inside tip.

Once they discovered a weakness, the hedge funds would borrow scrip from index funds, superannuation funds or others and try to bring on a crisis by ruthless shorting. An essential part of the process was to flood the market with rumours – some Australian companies have reported up to 70 a day. Sometimes a journalist would write a really tough article on a company often inspired by the shorters' research. The stock would slump. Sometimes the inside information was right and other times it was wrong. It did not matter much.

The early targets in Australia were companies like Centro, ABC Learning, Challenger and Allco. Each of these companies had flaws in their operation and the defenders of shorting would say that short selling merely hastened the crisis. On the other hand, it also prevented rescue attempts (Investors must fight back, February 27).

But globally it became apparent that the best shorting game was to go for banks, because if you could get a deposit run going on the bank the shorters' profits would be huge. Strangely, the first attempt at shorting a bank in Australia was a complete disaster. The shorters went for Bendigo Bank and shorted about 14 per cent of the capital. In that case the rumours were wrong. The bank was in good shape and a French bank bought in. The shorters had to cover and were routed (Bendigo shafts the shorters, March 12).

But overseas bank raids became a shorter’s picnic because of the huge sub-prime and other losses they faced.

In Australia the shorters played the bank game with Macquarie Bank trying to engineer a run on the bank and bring about its destruction. Like Bendigo Bank, Macquarie had no real difficulties and the shorters were routed, helped by a rally in the market, but it showed graphically what could be done.

The hedge funds have only themselves to blame for the Australian and global action against them because they took what was a reasonable activity and tried to manipulate the market to destroy the banking system. Not one group undertook such an action, but it was the collective outcome.

The people who were big victims of the shorting action were the clients of those who loaned the stock. They remained long in stocks and saw their unscrupulous managers lend stock to shorters who destroyed the value. The ruthless superannuation funds mangers who undertook those actions should have been fired. Now they can't do it and their clients are the winners.

The hedge funds are going to suffer big losses depending on how much time they are given by their supporters to cover. Many of the world banks loaned large sums to these funds and they will incur well deserved losses."
 
dutchie said:
In the news Kevin Rudd said that banning short selling will stop the manipulation of stocks.

Thank god for that, it will be heaven to deal in a market that is not being manipulated!!
Click to expand...

LOL.

I wish I was a fly on the wall in the briefing Mr. Rudd got...

"OK Mr. Rudd.
Now, this is your arrrrse.
And this is your elbow.
Etc."
 
Timmy said:
LOL.

I wish I was a fly on the wall in the briefing Mr. Rudd got...

"OK Mr. Rudd.
Now, this is your arrrrse.
And this is your elbow.
Etc."
Click to expand...

"so let me understand now..you can actually make money $$$ on a losing position? why the hell didnt we ban this already!?!"

my 5 cents, its not the shorters who entirely draw the market down its the vast majority running away with their tails between their legs & dumping their portfolios. this little brief fix will give those their will back to buy back into the market therefore creating this euforia that it was the short-sellers who created this downturn when infact it was the bears
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

CommSec should directly send info to Computershare/Link Market Services etc.
Replies
7
Views
2K
Value Collector
The dynamics of money and TIME: crimping cashflow for a period
Replies
3
Views
1K
TiminOz
  • Poll
SUPPLY ——- getting in front of the masses.
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
farmerge
September 2025 DDD
Replies
18
Views
1K
ducati916
Fun with ChatGPT
2
Replies
24
Views
4K
SirRumpole
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...