ducati916 said:
Mofra & enzo
I quite like the idea of building an Iron Condor credit spread, with the assumption that one side must lose, and I am therefore looking at how to best manage the inevitable move to a losing position.
By creating a double credit spread, you reduce your total risk to the spread less two credit spreads; thus hedging the losing leg with stock ATM, should eliminate the spread risk and create a fixed profit if you can close out the stock hedge for at least the remaining unhedged spread. The more of the spread you can capture in the day move, the greater the profit that can be locked in.
Rolling, would be a last ditch effort to salvage a position that had run away and the hedge had been missed, or you had been whipsawed out of it.
Theta decay would I imagine make it rather difficult in the front month, you might have to roll to the next expiry month.
Thoughts?
jog on
d998
One side need not necessarily lose, the price can close between the sold strikes.
There are quite a few different philosophies regarding iron condors.
Some like to write the credit spreads a loooooooong way away from the price action. On face value risk/reward is absolutely dreadful, but of course probability of profit is commensurately higher.
On the other hand, others are quite prepared to write them closer to the price action, and are quite comfortable with making defensive adjustments as often as appropriate.
There are different ways of defending. Here is one bloke who has done up a bit of a video on condor adjustments with some comments on strikes selected etc.
http://www.repairdudes.com/junky/RUT ic combo.html
I like hedging with stock prior to further adjustment, but the downside is that I am adding a delta adjustment that has no gamma factor attached to it, so adds black swan risk. Nothing wrong with this as long as the trader is aware of it. I use it as a temporary hedge, prior to possibly rolling strikes or some other action. (as you rightly point out, time till expiry can complicate the issues)
What I'm trying to get to is that there are lots of ways of dealing with threatened strikes, and each will have its advantage and disadvantage. The important thing is to have the thinking cap on when adjusting and for the trader to be aware of the new risk profile. In other words, there is nothing wrong with what you suggest, as long as the risk profile is satisfactory to you.
****reading through this doesn't much sense to me in my Boxing Day stupor, hope you know what I'm tryng to convey.
Cheers