- Joined
- 19 October 2005
- Posts
- 6,229
- Reactions
- 9,568
i would call it sovereign risk , rather than a genuine black swanAs I suggested yesterday, NWH has been royally shafted by the SA government and the Administrators, its particularly cynical of the SA Gov to legislate away a lease arrangement they were well aware of (despite their denial.)
I guess one of the learnings as an investor is that we are always subject to potential black swan events, the unknown, unknowns. This is an example of why buying high quality businesses with resilience built into their balance sheets and broader financials is so important. The non-cash impairment will basically offset most of NWH's earnings for 2025.
I would expect the share price will take a thumping and I may get another opportunity to increase my position at a significant discount to value.
getting shafted by the Queensland Government when you are a business is not rare up here , even large businesses like NHC and Adani get squeezed up here .. and of course the contractors/sub-contractors involved in progressing the projects get a rough time as well , in the contagion , it is not until the ripples hurt their union mates/supporters that decisions might changeI would say its a genuine black swan - literally an unknown, unknown. The type of black swan is so called* sovereign risk.
(I say 'so called' because its not a risk, its a hazard, risk is the probability of a hazard occurring. One of my pet hates is the misuse of the word 'risk' by the finance world.)
I reckon having 3 issues over the last decade is not abnormal for a large contractor in any sector. None of them proved to be of any real consequence in the long run. But they do create great opportunities for an investor as sentiment rather than fundamentals drives price in the short term.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?