It also brings into questions the other fracking technologies that also seem to risk irreversible damage to our soil and water.
There's a significant difference between hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas (which has been around a lot longer than most seem to realise) verus setting coal on fire underground and hoping to capture the partly burnt gases.
Hydraulic fracturing - a means to extract oil and/or gas that is already present.
Underground coal gasification - literally burning coal as such in order to produce a gas, then processing that to end up with liquid fuels.
Linc was doing the latter, others are generally doing the former.
That's not to say there's no risk, I'm just pointing out the very different technology being used.
I had an interest in Linc at one point and held a few shares but gave up on it years ago as certain aspects of the company's operations just didn't feel right to me. In short it was too much effort going into promotional stunts (for a company with no actual product to sell) and not enough focus on the actual technology and operation. It's one thing for someone like McDonald's or even an airline to engage in elaborate marketing, they have an actual product available for sale to the public, but it's another thing when junior minerals companies with nothing to sell start doing that sort of thing.
The final straw for me was Linc trying to promote Australian oil shale (that's hard rock that has to be mined, completely different to the "shale oil" being successfully extracted in the USA) as equivalent to the oil reserves of Saudi Arabia. That's about as ridiculous as saying that a 2 tonne pile of iron ore is the same thing as a Mercedes car and as such is worth $100K (or however much a Mercedes costs). No, it's not even close to being the same thing just as oil shale isn't oil.