LOL - Folau is initiating the action and therefore needs to PROVE his case, so it's not as you keep saying.No RA have to prove it.
Read aboveLOL - Folau is initiating the action and therefore needs to PROVE his case, so it's not as you keep saying.
GoFundMe can exercise its rights and not support;
27. any other activity that GoFundMe may deem in its sole discretion to be unacceptable.
Products aren't usually paid an income and selling people is called slavery.
So, VC, are you advocating for puberty blockers, cross sex hormones & irreversible surgery for children?
Free speech is a seriously important point in our society, as are its building blocks, and yes christian religion for us in the west, whether you are a Christian or not
So much more important than fake news about Iran or climate change.
My view..
Muhammad AliHis income is derived by selling his image, if he tarnished his image, his personal brand is no longer worth what he is being paid.
It’s all about selling an image, to advertisers.
For example, Britney Spears was dumped by Pepsi because she was seen drinking a coke.
RA is not bringing the action, Folau is.Once unlawful termination is alleged, it's up to RA to prove the termination wasn't anything to do with any unlawful reason, or for reasons INCLUDING that unlawful reason.
For example, Britney Spears was dumped by Pepsi because she was seen drinking a coke.
It’s all about selling an image, to advertisers.
RA is not bringing the action, Folau is.
Folau is citing Section 772 of the Fair Work Act, and needs to show that his religion was among the reasons for his dismissal.
Given RA has not cited Folau's religion (that I am aware) as relevant to his dismissal, RA consider they have no case to answer in relation to Folau being discriminated against.
How do I make that clearer to you?
OMG - Groundhog Day all over again!An employer must not terminate an employee’s employment for one or more of the following reasons, or for reasons including one or more of the following reasons:..(f)…religion.
The product is scoring tries and winning games, not opinions.It’s about an organization not wanting to keep him on the products list, after he causes himself to become damaged goods.
Think of him as a faulty product that just got recalled.
As I said he is not an employee paid to produce a product, he is the product, that gets sold to advertisers,
OMG - Groundhog Day all over again!
Are you not reading what is happening?
Religion was not the basis for termination.
Folau needs to prove it was.
Nope, it’s having an image you can sell to advertisers and fans.The product is scoring tries and winning games, not opinions.
Yes, but the advertisers react to the number of people watching the game and those people are a limited sector of society ie people who like Rugby Union and appreciate the skills of the game.
I doubt if the fans are particularly worried or threatened about what Folau said, they would just have a laugh and hope he scores points for Australia.
It's just the Lefty snowflakes who likely never watch the game who are "outraged".
There is plenty of other places for him to be employed, where he could use his football skills, he could coach teams after school.So, she probably got a Coke sponsorship.
As I said before, the ARU is a monopoly employer, there is nowhere else for him to go, nationally at least.
Which in the game of Rugby, is being good at the game of rugby.Nope, it’s having an image you can sell to advertisers and fans.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?