To a point.
If I saw something at way below my perceived fair price Id certainly look at it.
I know what your getting at a buy or sell at a price higher or lower in the Market depth in itself does not
trigger an action. Only at the coal face.
it's the "to a point" moment i am talking about
responsibility
the difference in knowing a cohesive trade technique that defines absolute bargain versus adding to a loser, have you qualified that difference in real time for that instrument?
big difference that can be qualified thus: emotive logic versus cognitive logic
emotive logic is dominant for a single retail trader when that trader has no trade technique to validate the extent or price extreme, time is an important key, how much time needs to pass and how much data do you need and/or can you get that says your idea of a bargain is merely an miss-pricing if you accept the market is always right, how often is the market wrong?
how do you determin the auction has not correctly adjusted the "fair value"
it is not the price that causes a trader to take action, the price is merely a marker of perceived value, for the trader to extract further value (by entering the trade) the trader needs to have two things: a technique for adjusting risk and an exit strategy
keep in mind a complete (my assumption) beginner is asking the question
the thread is mostly, todate, a series of what-if mechanical questions as a way of extracting value without, i suggest, understanding how to frame value