- Joined
- 23 June 2005
- Posts
- 608
- Reactions
- 3
TheAnalyst said:Just need this one to break right thru the resistence of $3.75 and it should begin its march towards $4-$4.50 i bought my new lots this morning can someone just buy their new lot lolol
michael_selway said:Hi when u say "new lots" u mean GTP or GTP warrants?
Also next resistance after 3.75, u say 4-4.5, where abouts exactalt in the range do u see?
thx
MS
abucs said:My thoughts are :
$230mil already to be recognised this year ($150m deferred from 05 and $80m in woodlot sales to 31 dec)
+ $80 mil viticulture (forecast - Roadshow January 2006)
+ $60 mil olives (forecast - Roadshow January 2006)
+ $230 mil remaining 2006 woodlots (conserative estimate)
= $600 mil.
And this is not counting any revenue from the new cattle product.
savtin1 said:Michael, Selway,
My break -up is as follows:
1. Timber plantations = $79 million + $285M (same figure as last years second half result - hopefully proves to be conservative) = $364M
2. Vineyards - Based on the 1000 Ha projection = $80 but lets book in $75M
3. Olives - $55 million.
4. Cattle - $10 million
This gives us a total sales figure of $364+75+55+10 = $504Million much more than the conservative estimate of Macuaries Report which had stated $400M.
Note also that the proportion of the "other than plantation" is about 28% similar to what they forecast at the AGM of up to 30%.
Now the recoginsed revenue for the year will be as follows:-
1. plantation (recognised say 48%) = 364 x .48 =175
2. vineyards - (recognised = 90% a figure i got from GTP) = 75 x .9 =68
3. olives ( recognised = 70% same as above) = 55 x .7 = 38.5
4. cattle (85%) = 10x .85 = 8.5
5. deferred revenue of $150 m
therefore we have the following:
175+68+38.5+8.5+150 = $440Million add the other revenue as per last year say another $20million and this gives us Project Revenue of $460Million (45% increase on last years figure)
profit = .389 (similar margin to last year) x 460 = $178 million
cheers
savtin
GO GTP
TheAnalyst said:GTP is less risk than TIM as GTP they transfer the risk on to the investor..market still is to catch on to this yet
michael_selway said:Hi Analyst, what do u mean when u say they tranfer the risk on to the investor?
If TIM doesnt transfer risk to the "investor", does it have any advantages over GTP?
Satvin, yeah will have to wait and see, esp the sales for the 2nd half
thx
MS
TheAnalyst said:timbercorp actauly owns theres but GTP does not own the product they produce on behalf of the investors as GTP only own the land and manage the harvest from plantation to sale.
michael_selway said:Oh ok,
Is there any advantages of owning as opposed to not owning plantations?
TheAnalyst said:yer, certianly if there is a bad year and there is a loss the owner of the crop bears the loss not the owner of the land.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?