- Joined
- 24 December 2008
- Posts
- 130
- Reactions
- 0
I agree we're starting to see it mentioned more in the financial media and that analysts are starting to become bullish on it, but we don't have Jamie Durie out there on prime time with his metal detector yet doinig 'gold prospectors blitz' so still a ways to go imo.
With both the Bank of England and US Reserve printing money, isn't this only going to push Gold up?
And Sinner, I learnt that patting oneself on the back may put one on thin ice. Much better to follow after the event.
And Sinner, I learnt that patting oneself on the back may put one on thin ice. Much better to follow after the event.
Hi Apocalypto, I do not know if the last line is directed at me but my prediction for this weeks Treasury strength was backed up with a host of reasons, all of which ended up being correct to the tee. I never claimed any soothesaying abilities from my recent gold long mentioned above and in fact mentioned it was not the norm for me (I only took a trading signal to wake up finding the USD had crapped its pants). On the other hand I was skeptical of golds rise all the way from 946-1000 and again all my posts claiming this come with a bunch of justification for my opinion.
But I am not here to discuss that, rather to post a small dissert by John Embry of Sprott Asset Management out of Canada who I have a lot of respect for (plus they are long RMS like me
http://www.sprott.com/pdf/investorsdigest/digest.pdf
In the middle of his usual gold-bug rant, he points out just how huge the SPDR GLD holdings supposedly are now, supposedly more than the Swiss National Bank, yet such a huge accumulation of physical has not put a dent in supply or even provided much support to the price action.
So are these "physical longs" really even there? Or is SPDR just holding huge and leveraged long futs against the bank shorts? How can they really be the 6th largest gold holder in the world? They are already the third largest ETF in the world (behind only SPY and QQQQ).
I am not here to decide one way or the other for you. But personally I am far more skeptical of GLD, its holdings, and its extremely complex legal structure than holding a bar for roughly the same cost in a safe deposit box or burying it for free.
Ever wondered what a trillion dollars looks like?
http://www.pagetutor.com/trillion/index.html
Doesn't look like gold is convinced the 'stimulis' will work, again? All in the open now about printing the 'I-owe-you-noughts' and gold...down...$10?
Gold/Dow = 1 when?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?