I was wondering why Accounts Recievable and Accounts Payable aren't included (apart from accounting reasons)?
EG. If your EV is $100m, but your Accounts Recievable - Accounts Payable is $101m, that means your future incoming cash flow (if the business is sold or closed) will be worth more than the EV.
Its just another formula I think, I use it as part of my analysis and look at EV/NPAT ratio, if you know what the market ratio is overall its a quick and dirty number to look at in comparison to other businesses.
I was wondering why Accounts Recievable and Accounts Payable aren't included (apart from accounting reasons)?
EG. If your EV is $100m, but your Accounts Recievable - Accounts Payable is $101m, that means your future incoming cash flow (if the business is sold or closed) will be worth more than the EV.
Wouldnt net debt include cash? I have only ever seen the calculation done with total debt - but then I havent really looked at many other definitions of EV.
EDIT - here is a link which answers the question indirectly - and suggests some more complexity be added to the traditional calculation of EV.