- Joined
- 24 May 2009
- Posts
- 3,252
- Reactions
- 255
The earliest historical source that exists which places a pagan holiday on December 25 is the proclamation by Roman Emperor Aurelian of a celebration of Sol Invictus on that day in 274 CE.
]
The earliest Christian reference to December 25 as the birth of Christ, however, dates from 202 CE.”
“There is no doubt that Santa Claus in its present form is a fairy tale or myth. However, there really was a Santa Claus.
The name ‘Santa Claus’ is an Anglicized form of the Dutch Sinter Klaas, which in turn meant ‘Saint Nicholas.’
Somebody has done some homework to produce his tome:
http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/Christmas_TheRealStory.htm
So that shows that Tink is wrong, and the pagen celebration did exist before Christmas.
I doubt Tink would be wrong, merely putting out the argument for discussion. My mum is a weekly church goer and we kids were all Sundayschoolised & Churchafied; there was never any doubt that Jesus didn't look like an Italian with paper thin skin and that his age is a side issue and that it's commonsense to have celebrations when there isn't pressing jobs to do like sowing, ploughing, copulating and harvesting. The Queen herself has a myriad of birth dates.
I mean she is wrong with her claim that that the Christian celebration predates the pagan one.
I didn't notice that bit, but yeah whatever reference she is quoting seems to be rather optimistic that the foreboding of winter wouldn't spawn some kind of festival before the challenges of making it out the other side thawed out, pliable and breathing. Even more important when you consider living past your thirties was an achievement back then ...
And if we didn't have something to celebrate, we would just have to make something up, we all need to drink, eat, be merry and let people know we love them, those are what Christmas is to most.
Would you say that the story of Mohammed and therefore Islam is just as mythical as the story of Jesus and Christianity ?
Would you say that the story of Mohammed and therefore Islam is just as mythical as the story of Jesus and Christianity ?
Definitely not.
Long story short: Mohammad wrote the Quran in one piece as a religio-political manifesto. Jesus didn't write any of the Gospels; His teachings - if in fact any survived in their original form - were written and edited by a great number of followers over centuries, adding myths and legends to the basic tenet.
Interesting that the Muslims recognise Jesus's existence and regard him as a prophet of Allah.
Would you say that the story of Mohammed and therefore Islam is just as mythical as the story of Jesus and Christianity ?
Interesting that the Muslims recognise Jesus's existence and regard him as a prophet of Allah.
Interesting that the Muslims recognise Jesus's existence and regard him as a prophet of Allah.
They recognise other mythical figures too: Moses, Abraham, Satan, and a number of Archangels.
But so do Mormons and, I believe, Latter-Day Saints as well.
The only truly original, as far as I can think of, is L.Ron Hubbard's Science Fictionology. He really invented a brand new Fantasia, without reference to any earlier ones. Which probably explains why all followers of those older creeds feel spurned, ignored, and are therefor especially vehement in objecting to his piece of fiction.
(All, with the exception of Hollywood make-believers, of course. But we all know what a gullible bunch they are.)
Its called Fan fiction Buddy, Islam came about hundreds of years after the stories of Jesus had made the rounds.
Allah is just the Arabic would for god, and Allah is the god of Abraham, the same god from the Old and new testament, So the kept a lot of the same characters and just wrote a new book to suit themselves, Much like the Christians did.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?