Fair enough, but what i have a hard time understanding is how the whole thing can just fix itself almost OVERNIGHT...
As McLovin said, an increase of 25% in LIBOR would be a catastrophic event sure to freeze up credit for weeks wouldn't it?
My guess is, that just like 1st world banks in 2008, the reason it fixed itself is not because interbank lending conditions got much much better, but simply that banks stopped using the instrument for credit, so the rate falls on no volume. It's not that they've lost access to credit completely, they are just getting it direct from the CB discount window now.
As for definitions of "fix itself" I would say things aren't fixed until the curve returns to a normal shape, it's not just about the overnight rate. If you go here you can see the curve is messy as hell http://www.shibor.org/shibor/web/html/ (in a normal curve overnight should yield the lowest and 1Y should yield the most with a systematic rise in the yield as duration increases)
So the discount window is the injection of liquidity that they mentioned yesterday?
My guess is, that just like 1st world banks in 2008, the reason it fixed itself is not because interbank lending conditions got much much better, but simply that banks stopped using the instrument for credit, so the rate falls on no volume. It's not that they've lost access to credit completely, they are just getting it direct from the CB discount window now.
My guess is, that just like 1st world banks in 2008, the reason it fixed itself is not because interbank lending conditions got much much better, but simply that banks stopped using the instrument for credit, so the rate falls on no volume. It's not that they've lost access to credit completely, they are just getting it direct from the CB discount window now.
Or were they sending a message to banks about their lending?
No mistake. Thats what they were trying to do. I bet though they didn't expect/want the massive smack down in the markets.
No mistake. Thats what they were trying to do. I bet though they didn't expect/want the massive smack down in the markets.
So there was some sort of mistiming by the PBOC initially that allowed the rate to climb that high, presumably if they had flooded the market with cash SHIBOR would have fallen? Or were they sending a message to banks about their lending?
This is all very interesting, thanks for the explanation Sinner.
So the cost to insure is also rising, so we're sure there is higher isk perceived there now, at least by those who can afford insurance.
What are the key things to look for next? Will the market key in on these things, i.e. the index futs?
CanOz
- - - Updated - - -
This should be a good thing though right? That the markets react to this info? I just don't know how much weight to put behind the Shanghai futures movements...say compared to the HSI. These developed markets should be pretty good at pricing risk, compared to less mature markets like Shanghai?
Yeah like TH said, they are definitely trying to signal the opposite of other CBs in the sense of
a) Tightening in response to rises in asset classes (real estate especially)
b) Killing off shadow funding market (Copper Funding CCFD stuff)
c) Reigning in dodgy lending
If you have not been reading Michael Pettis blog "China Financial Markets" you are missing out, the guy lives in China and teaches Central Bankers-to-be at Peking University: http://www.mpettis.com/
Yuan loan to deposit ratio at approx 60%, below the 75% required level - Chinese press- UPDATE - Source TradeTheNews.com
This is the leverage that they're employing right? So, this isn't good that its getting higher is it?
There is huge amounts of unofficial and ugly leverage in the Chinese financial system CanOz, official stuff like loan/deposits doesn't mean too much in a centrally planned economy.
Check out the Copper Financing Deals.
http://www.mpettis.com/2011/05/25/looking-for-debt/
That's where the leverage is really coming from.
Good grief....here i was thinking these people were not creative...
China's State Administration on Foreign Exchange (SAFE) on May 5 finally passed new regulations which will effectively end such financing deals.
GS --
...
Our view is that the bulk of copper stored in bonded warehouses in China – at least 510,000t at present, as well as some inbound copper shipments into China – is being used to unlock the CNY-USD interest rate differential. This material has not been entirely unavailable to the market (deals can be broken if costs rise, such as a tightening of LME spreads), but the inventory has been effectively financed by factors exogenous to the copper market for some time.
We find that a complete unwind of CCFDs would be bearish for copper prices as the copper used to unlock the differential would shift from being a positive return/carry asset to a negative carry asset for those who currently hold it. As such this inventory will likely become more ‘available’ to the global market. Initially stocks would likely move into the Chinese domestic market to ease the current tightness, until the current SHFE price premium to LME closes.
...
So that was 2011, back when Michael Pettis started telling people about it.
Now look last month, before all this SHIBOR stuff started:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-...ives-end-copper-financing-chinas-lehman-event
Wish you told me sooner Sinner
The Copper ETF...lets look for rally's to sell then shall we?
Specialist copper analyst Simon Hunt looks to copper peaking in Q1 but fading badly thereafter, then a parabolic rise in 2012 followed by a drastic collapse 2013-2016.
...
Bottom line: there is somewhere between 3MT and 4MT of cathode warehoused outside the reporting system in China.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?