Slow couple of weeks due home relocation, getting back to some sort of routine now...
Closed L GMG / ARF on 26/10 for + 2.18% - ARF sold down to 1.808 for a brief moment on 24/10, had an opportunity to close the trade at ~1.90 and didn't take it. Tech issues on 25/10 prevented access from work location, missed further opportunity to close out during market hours.
Opened L ORI / RIO just now at 1.86 sigma, the pair back tests at 84% W/L over 25 trades with 1.82 ROIC and 3.8% reversion target currently on offer.
FYI ORI reporting this Friday 4 Nov.
Fn arena. Pretty commonly used for traders.Out of interest, can you recommend a single, collated, reference source for earnings and corporate actions, or do you typically check the investor website for each company individually?
Out of interest, can you recommend a single, collated, reference source for earnings and corporate actions, or do you typically check the investor website for each company individually?
Fn arena. Pretty commonly used for traders.
Yes you'd think that in the 21st Century, in a developed market like ASX, something like this would be available.
I read quite a few analyst reports daily and many of them have a calendar or weekly "what's ahead" type of section. You also build more knowledge over time so you will get to know some of the companies that report out of cycle like ORI. Lastly if you are not trading too many pairs, then a quick check to confirm the absence of scheduled announcements is probably prudent (either before putting on the trade, or certainly before close). You can simply scroll down announcements from the year before to know roughly when that particular company reports.
I'm struggling a little taking signals / assessing opportunities out of a large-ish pool of mined pairs. Presumably the answer to this is to refine the list of pairs down to a manageable portfolio of 15-20 that I've already performed fundamental checks on in advance.
Some of you guys seem to be taking signals from quite large lists of pairs - I'd be really keen to understand how you manage signal qualification and pre-trade check workflows in a little more detail.
Happy to share mine in more detail if that's not talking out of school / useful...
The attachment is basically how I'm working right now.
0. Signal Enrichment & Shortlisting - Update all the pairs in the list and dump those that are +2/-2 SD from 21 observation mean to CSV. I've written a pricing tool in R that takes the delta of the ratio from the mean and uses it to calculate a rough trade potential dollar amount with my leg sizes and brokerage factored in. I take the trades that are worth looking at (generally anything 2.5%+ net brokerage), import them to a portfolio and backtest them with a simple strategy.
I am not totally sure what this means but it sounds like you are just making sure the potential profits in the trade is worth taking. I am guessing this doesn't take a lot of time and it's something I do as well. However, a quick eyeball of the ratio chart in Pairs Trade Finder will suffice most of the time.
1. - Signal Validation - For signals with worthwhile potential and acceptable backtest results, I manually eyeball a bunch of statistical output to make sure the Z-Score is aligned with the spread/ratio (eg, reversion isn't just due to time decay, spread is actually reverting), PACF and Q-Q Normality (checking for normally distributed returns to validate the Engle-Granger results), manually validating the log price series over a couple of time frames to see if the price action makes sense.
This seems sound and I like the bold part. Perhaps another quick way to check is a simple "Total return" comparison (see image) of the 2 stocks in question plus any other applicable peers over a week and month timeframe. So you get a sense of how the current divergent compares to longer timeframes.
Again, eyeballing the ratio chart will reveal much of this information at a glance.
2. Event Risk - Checks company announcements, news digest, corporate and dividend calendars for upcoming events. I'm basically just using Morningstar for this - still learning what sort of events will impact price movement (eg. AGM before or after reports being released etc...). I'll disqualify a trade with a significant event in the trade horizon. I'll also stay out of a trade with a fundamental trigger, for example the IOF announcement on 14/11 that triggered a load of REITs.
A must do and it will get done quicker over time.
BTW, not sure if the announcement by IOF on 14/11 is that meaningful for the sector...
3. Fundamental Fit - Checks company summary description / Morningstar analyst report for validation of fundamental thesis (eg. general stuff like avoiding miners in different locations / metals, pairs like PGH and ORA that are a statistical fit with JHX and BLD but a poor fundamental one..).
Much of this should be done before the pair are backtested. Once you are comfortable enough to put the pair into your pairs monitor, you don't need to do these again everytime you get a signal. So this process seems to be in the wrong place of the workflow.
Review basic ratios like P/E, P/B, and checking out DCF to avoid taking a long/short position in a relatively over or under valued leg. I've started using SimplyWall.St to quickly form a position on whether one leg is fundamentally stronger or weaker / over or under valued than the other and using this as a filter to avoid trades that aren't on the correct side of the assessment.
I am not sure this is helpful considering the timeframe and size of movements you are trading. Is there any reason to suggest that a higher / lower PE stock will over/underperform over a random period of 3 to 15 days?
And if you are caught on the wrong side occasionally... that's what a stop loss is for.
4. News Flow - Quick check of a bunch of open news sources (I totally need to sign up for FN Arena... actually... I'm gonna go do this tonight) for anything that would keep me out / wasn't apparent in the announcements.
May be... but I don't do it during the trading day. Analyst reports (or summary of them) are often useful and they should be skim read to build up knowledge on particular stocks. You will catch things like... there's an government inquiry into private hospital charges, or XYZ has a blockbusting drug trial results due next month, or OPEC has a meeting next week, or a big overseas takeover in similar sector etc etc. It's not possible to know everything, but the more you know the better the outcome over the long term.
This protects you mostly from any known unknowns. You will still get caught by the unknown unknowns... and that's what your positions sizing strategy is for.
5. Trade Execution - General execution and pre-trade management.
This is something that will take a long time to improve as well. What is the market doing? What's the depth doing? Should I cross the spread, take the centre point or wait on the bid/ask? Should I take 10,000 shares in one hit or 5 x 2,000 shares? Can I go long first and sell the short leg after it moves up another 2 ticks?
Master this and you are almost better off as a day trader!
As you call out, getting speed is probably more a function of longer term market exposure (I've only been at it a few weeks...), but anything to improve the workflow / process is a bonus...
This is impressive. A great road-map that aspiring pairs traders would do well to take note of.The attachment is basically how I'm working right now.
Some great comments in your reply SKC. Reading through KAO's post and then your reply had me reflecting on how many different tools/sources are actually required in the pairs trading process.It's a balance between what is ideal and what is practical... plus what pairs style you are actually trying to achieve.
Are you are doing 50 trades a year part time using end of day prices? Or are you doing 200 pairs a month arbing some short term noises? Or are you trading fundamentally over 3-6 months using statistics as a trigger? These different styles will impact where you should aim for on the spectrum of perfect signal and practicality.
Interestingly, Iron Mountain (INM) is now part of the A-REIT index (XPJ)!
Maybe this could be a good buddy to WFD and GMG due to its international footprint (69% revenue in US, 17% Europe)
INM has always been a REIT in US and pays quarterly dividend... perhaps it's a trust of industrial properties with a business attached!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?