- Joined
- 18 February 2006
- Posts
- 4,200
- Reactions
- 2
What do you think of Gerard Burg's (of NAB melbourne- minerals and energy) Zinc to drop 11% in 2008: Study story quoted here at Buisness standard dot com do any of you think it a major concern in relation to AAR's potential KP project and outlined plans in general?
Hey Hangseng,
Yeah I know I'm being conservative, but I prefer to be conservative than over optimistic, even then with a "conservative" view I can still easily justify a 17c-18c target for AAR, now that makes you think, if we through caution to the wind what would we get?
I mean valuing Koongie on an Industry Norm of 10% of I.G.V./InSitu = $120m = 24c on its own
Chart wise there is now clear support at 8c-9c but for some strange reason the stock keeps failing to break 12c-13c, eventually though it should and will break this as it has to get re-rated
I mean focusing purely on Koongie, the most comparable deposits are TZN's Angus and PDZ'z Prarie Downs
The main thing to note however is both TZN's and PDZ's deposits lack COPPER and thus imo are inferior as they are more succeptible to Single commodity price swings The thing about AAR's Angas is like JML's Jaguar, its diversified with Copper, Zinc, Lead and Silver, a VMS if you will.
TZN currently carries a Mkt Cap of $400m, however they also have other substantial projects so it would be incorrect to infer that Angas accounts for the bulk of this value, however prior to any of thier other projects gaining recognition (ie Early-Mid 2006) TZN carried a mkt capitalisation of $100m-$150m, which was reflective of the 10% I.G.V of Angas As Angas moved further along the development path a premium to the 10% was given
PDZ's mkt cap is $110m and its main deposit/project is Prarie Downs, now PDZ is also only in a PFS type stage yet their mkt cap is $100m
BSM carries a mkt cap of $40m and they are mining via toll treatment a very small but high grade Zinc/Lead deposit, they do have substantial exploration potential, but then so does AAR at Mandilla and Victoria Downs,
Now why does say PDZ carry a mkt cap double AAR with an inferior deposit and no cash flow operations? Same resoan why BSM carries a mkt cap close to AAR when all it has is a small cash cow project (like AAR's Mandilla) with huge exploration potential (like AAR's Victoria Downs)
The answer is simple, BROKER COVERAGE!
Fat Prophets, Hartleys and Patersons were all over TZN early days hence why people knew and appreciated its true value, likewise Hartleys were the main backers of JML hence why the mkt always knew its true value,
Patersons has backed and provided research reports for PDZ and BSM, again why the mkt can appreciate the potential and the value,
But AAR has no real coverage, FAT Prophets did cover AAR a while back as did Intersuisse, see below for important extracts,
Bottom line is management have now given Koongie a Insitu value = to me it shows their getting more and more serious with, the re-rating is coming, its only amatter of time
Research Reports
http://www.anglo.com.au/_content/documents/538.pdf
http://www.anglo.com.au/_content/documents/537.pdf
I don't know too much detail about the plant but in reading of it's proximity to KP, was reminded of Matrix metals (MRX) venture at Leichhardt where they had processing facilities in place in needing very little work to recommence processing and furthermore a relatively minor capital outlay to bring processing up to nearly double the start up capacity......Edited for brevity....
Watch very closely for any development of the closed nearby Nicholsons Find process plant. It is within throwing distance of Koongie Park and AAR management have made mention of it in the past. This could easily be upgraded for this project and AAR would aquire it for a song. What does this equate to? Early production potential (mid to late 2009 earliest though) and low capex startup costs. I am not the only one thinking like this now.
I don't know too much detail about the plant but in reading of it's proximity to KP, was reminded of Matrix metals (MRX) venture at Leichhardt where they had processing facilities in place in needing very little work to recommence processing and furthermore a relatively minor capital outlay to bring processing up to nearly double the start up capacity...
oi what happened to AAR, suddenly its 0.90. Previously stuck at 0.93 for some time in the afternoon. Someone just sold big volume? can someone check?
its 0.9 now.
oi what happened to AAR, suddenly its 0.90. Previously stuck at 0.93 for some time in the afternoon. Someone just sold big volume? can someone check?
its 0.9 now.
Exactly.
I have been involved in plant relocations and upgrades of closed plants during my years in construction and it is done at relatively low startup cost compared to building a new mine. Also no where near as labour intensive.
I am watching this aspect very closely and have sent out some spies so to speak. In reality I have requested my associates in the construction and mineral processing areas to keep their ears to the ground.
This is a very real possibility.
It was a Gold strike at Nicolson's yes? I couldn't find out too much (anything) about the facilities there. KP is quite diverse in the commodities, I wonder how much modification would be required?
In fact, would it be possible for AAR to have signed or negotiated a contract price for the old processing plant without notifying the ASX? Because I would have thought by announcing it's possible usefulness in publications it would give the seller pretty good negotiating power with regard to the price... I agree that any announcement with regard to the plant and intended work/upgrade on it will be a good sign for the price of stock and movement toward processing KP.
Hopefully HS, your "spies" might have some interesting news for us sooner rather than later, my biggest hopes are that the metallurgy looks good and that the board are as conservative as has been suggested....
Hmmmm,
Has gone quiet over here
Any updates Hangseng?
I agree rehabing an old plant would be much much cheaper than buying and installing a new one, but most importantly it would be much much much quicker!
Its the delays (and resulting cost blow outs) but mainly the delays in sourcing equipment etc that is halting and effecting mining projects,
I really hope they can go ahead with the refurbishment of this old plant
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?