This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Why Millennials are financially ruined

over9k

So I didn't tell my wife, but I...
Joined
12 June 2020
Posts
5,632
Reactions
8,336

Millennials now hold less than a quarter of the wealth their parents did at their age.

Ouch.
 
Millennials now hold less than a quarter of the wealth their parents did at their age.

Ouch.

A case of too much $20 smashed avo on toast at Hipster cafes, overseas trips and $1,000 iPhones. You can't have it all.

And yes, I did watch the video. While there are obviously other factors at play, vastly different attitudes towards saving and spending account for a large part of that disparity IMO.
 
Last edited:
This has been debunked over and over and over and over. There's just cold hard data on things like unemployment rates, wages, loan debts, actual house costs etc etc. Housing is the most expensive it has ever been just as a simple example.

Ignoring all of that the fact that you think you can actually function in the modern world without a phone/internet connection/computer etc really says everything. These are all NECESSITIES, not luxuries. You are completely out of touch.
 
Ignoring all of that the fact that you think you can actually function in the modern world without a phone/internet connection/computer etc really says everything. These are all NECESSITIES, not luxuries.
Agreed that a phone, internet etc is a necessity in the modern world.

Some do seem to manage to spend an awful lot of money on that sort of thing though, replacing perfectly good and technically adequate equipment for no reason other than fashion and buying the latest for the sake of it.

That's not to say there aren't issues between generations, there certainly are problems I agree, but some do make things unnecessarily bad for themselves. If you're on a worker on ordinary wages, and spending in way that even an actually rich person would see no value in, well that's not going to end well.
 
I agree completely, but the difference between a high end smartphone of say $1000 vs an adequate one of $500 is not exactly going to buy you a lot of house. If you keep it for five years then that's a sum total of $2 a WEEK.
 
It does sound harsh in these PC days, but there is a lot of truth in your sentiment, these days it is just about compulsory to have a finishing up party at the end of primary school, leavers week of indulgence after high school, gap year is a must have to wedge in some travel.

I have four kids aged between 35 and 42, the penny is starting to drop and it hasn't been held up due to lack of my input. I helped the oldest buy a house in the third year of his apprenticeship and the oldest daughter when she was 21.
Eventually you have to let them learn from experience, you can only be asked to butt out so many times, before you heed their advice and take a step back. Let them keep redrawing on their equity, to fund a life of the rich and famous, then when it turns to manure look around with arms out saying how did that happen.

There are a lot of lessons being learnt ATM and I feel a lot more are to come before this plays out, if China starts to really turn the screws, the pain will increase.
Just my opinion.
 
I agree completely, but the difference between a high end smartphone of say $1000 vs an adequate one of $500 is not exactly going to buy you a lot of house.
Agreed but the difference between someone who buys a phone and keeps it for a few years versus someone who's constantly buying a new one because they've smashed the screen yet again or there's a new model out will add up considerably over time assuming that overall approach applies across their life and isn't limited to phones.

Those who don't value money will always end up broke.

I've seen that happen among people I've worked with. Someone on pretty good $ and effectively broke because the whole lot's gone on cars, phones and all manner of other things that they never managed to keep for long before smashing them etc. I've also seen others on half the income but in a far better position financially because they avoid waste.

Incidentally everyone I know who's done well financially has something in common. They've been genuinely poor at some point when fairly young. No exceptions there, that's the common link. That experience tends to prompt a cautious approach to spending which remains permanently.

Part of the pain in the business community will be due to that I expect. Those who have never been through tough times and who haven't allowed for it in their business planning will be learning some very hard lessons at the moment.
 
Last edited:
If 25 million aussies lived frugally,instead of wasting their wages on crap,this country's economy would be in the toilet in no time.People want to spend their money and enjoy their lives.Let'em!Be grateful to those lefties running the education departments these days.If financial literacy ever catches on in junior high school,that will be the death of our services economy.Half the sharemarket will go....eekk.
 

Debunked by whom? I graduated from university during the last recession in the early 90s. Everyone except the children of the rich had crap cars, second hand clothes, and we all drank goon and cheap beer. The only time you went to a cafe when when the oldies were shouting you. At best you went to the pub when they had $5 steak specials if you bought a beer.

The consumerism among the 18-30 crowd in 2020 is simply out of control. $1,000 phones being turned over every year. People burying themselves in debt to buy new cars, label clothes and go on overseas trips just so they can post about it on social media and impress everyone.

My first job paid $300 a week in 1991. That's before tax. I have lived on two minute noodles, Savings brand Irish Stew, and pasta for months at a time. My first car was a bogged up orange Datsun 180B with a manual choke. The world was completely different back then. We expected to live like this in our 20s and were not surprised or embarrassed by it.

The only time unemployment has been worse in Australian than it was back in 1991 was this year because of the pandemic. The whinging from Millennials about doing it tough because they had to own the same $1,000 phone for two years has been going on a lot longer than that.

Yes, housing is expensive. So buy a smaller place, further out from the CBD. But most won't. $250,000 houses in some areas in capital cities. Anyone can pay that mortgage. It'll be $250 a week at most with interest rates where they are.
 
Last edited:
Of course. But how many millennials actually buy a new $1000 phone every 12 months or whatever? There are those idiots out there who do that, same as you get those idiots that spend $500 on a pair of sneakers or something else equally ridiculous, but that certainly isn't most of us.

I'm not saying there isn't a kernel of truth to my generation's financial irresponsibility, but to pretend that what's being asserted explains all or even most of the situation we find ourselves in is just so far from reality that I don't really know what to say other than to just look at the data on wages, unemployment, housing etc.

We were f***ed over the most by the gfc and we've been f***ed over the most by this pandemic as well - whenever things get tight, even just in microcosm as a company encounters hard times or whatever, it's always the people at the bottom that get culled and f***ed over first/the most, and this pandemic is no exception. The ones getting particularly hosed now are gen Z, but most of them weren't lied to like we were and so haven't been scammed by the universities in anywhere near the numbers, so they're actually doing better than expected.


Your assertion is anecdotes, mine is data.
 
Last edited:
You can eat for $5 a day. You can buy second hand clothes and second hand phones. You can buy a $1,000 car at Grays online and keep it for a decade. I know because I bought one. But is any young person prepared to live like that in a world dominated by social media? Some perhaps, but not many. Ideas about image and status have changed dramatically since the early 2000s.
 
I am calling bull....t.

"I graduated from university during the last recession in the early 90s" What exactly did you graduate in?
$300pw in 1991, $15k pa, for a graduate, must have been a crap degree.

"The world was completely different back then." The world hasn't fundamentally changed.
":The whinging from Millennials about doing it tough because they had to own the same $1,000 phone for two years has been going on a lot longer than that." It seems you are doing the whinging.
"Yes, housing is expensive. So buy a smaller place, further out from the CBD. But most won't. $250,000 houses in some areas in capital cities. Anyone can pay that mortgage. It'll be $250 a week at most with interest rates where they are."
Love to debate all these metrics with you, as you are wrong, actually you are right, housing/shelter and the fundamentals have change significantly but busy using my 1991, 1995 degrees to do something proactive.

"It'll be $250 a week at most with interest rates where they are." Find me a house where you can pay $12,500 on a 25 year mortgage in Melbourne at 0% interest rates.

Please.
 
Last edited:
If your argument boils down to "the problem is that you're not living on $5 of food a day", you've lost.
 
Of course. But how many millennials actually buy a new $1000 phone every 12 months or whatever?
Enough that not too long ago Telstra based their marketing around exactly that.

"New phone feeling" as they called it. Get a new one every year. They must have thought there'd be demand for it otherwise they wouldn't have used it for marketing.

To be clear I've no problem with that, it's their money, just so long as they don't then claim to be poor and hard done by.

Leased cars, new phones every 12 months, brand new houses, frequent travel, keeping up with fashion and so on. I've no problem with people choosing to do that so long as they don't then whinge that they're hard done by. It has never been the case that most ordinary people could afford to live like that.

Not everyone's doing that of course but for those who are, well unless they're actually rich then they can't really expect it to work.
 
The data in all probability compares housing affordability in Sydney/Melbourne, most data does these days, when in reality there are other cities in Australia that over the same period of time in real terms prices have fallen.
The other misconception, is that most are actively saving with the goal of buying a house, when in reality most people don't save, which has always been the case in Australia and one of the major reasons superannuation was started.
For those younger people, that are savers and investors who want to buy into Sydney/Melbourne it is hard and it always has been.
Every generation cops some form of financial setback, in the 1970's getting loans was hard, wages were low. In the 1980's there was a recession, interest rates were high, unemployment was high, wages actually went backwards, the 1990's another recession. You probably experienced the rest.
 
These are still just anecdotes. But if you want some data on cars, 2nd hand car sales are now at record highs whilst new car sales are in the toilet. The data does not support your assertion/anecdote.

Again, the data supports everything I've said - unemployment, wages, house prices, pick your poison. I have had absolutely zero actually provable in the data responses at all. None.


I'd be happy to examine the actual evidence with, well, anyone, but if analysed data is going to be responded to with evidenceless assertions & anecdotes, then I think the argument has been lost.
 
If your argument boils down to "the problem is that you're not living on $5 of food a day", you've lost.
I don't think anyone's arguing that others should live on noodles etc.

That said, look at the statistics for overseas travel and look at the sort of cars people have now. It's a vastly wealthier society now compared to the way things were in the aftermath of the early-1990's downturn.
 
I am calling bull....t.

"I graduated from university during the last recession in the early 90s" What exactly did you graduate in?
$300pw in 1991, $15k pa, for a graduate, must have been a crap degree.

It was a crap degree. My first job was editing cheap corporate videos for a bloke in the suburbs who operated a production house. I was paid $300 a week and did it for 18 months.

"The world was completely different back then." The world hasn't fundamentally change.

No internet, no social media.

":The whinging from Millennials about doing it tough because they had to own the same $1,000 phone for two years has been going on a lot longer than that." It seems you are doing the whinging.

I'm not whinging at all, just sharing my thoughts and experiences.


OK, you can't quite get into a house in Melbourne for $250,000 but you can get into a flat for less:

https://www.realestate.com.au/property-unit-vic-melton-129964422

In Adelaide and Brisbane you can get a house for $200,000.

https://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-qld-east+ipswich-134004174
 
Please present something of value, Melton. Hardly Melbourne

And whatever you degree was must have been worthless, as I worked through my second degree on the weekends and earned more than $300, cry me a river.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...