tech/a
No Ordinary Duck
- Joined
- 14 October 2004
- Posts
- 20,517
- Reactions
- 6,759
Muppets.
I own a company we have 12 in the fleet.
I will gladly place on this site for you Nun all rego papers it will cost you rightly $500 to Joe in support of allowing muppets to post on an otherwise reasonable site.
As for the statements shown For $500 each queried I will also produce the entire account for varification REAL no demo account.Think Ive posted around 5 or 6
Joe should make about $3000.
Away you go muppet I might have a mouth but I also have the goods!
Watch the muppets back off at 1000 mile an hr.
By the way dopey I also challenged a poster who it turned out HAD the goods. The bet was $500 which I sent to Joe in 24 hrs.
So I dont welch either!
Ha, lol Mr J. I thought it was fine.
Thanks Motorway, that's actually a really good way of looking at it. It's sometime easy to get stuck in a linear, static way of thinking. "Relativity", what a concept! It certainly makes you think in the "here and the now".
Yes.
Your comment is absolute and utter rubbish.
Ha, lol Mr J. I thought it was fine.
Thanks Motorway, that's actually a really good way of looking at it. It's sometime easy to get stuck in a linear, static way of thinking. "Relativity", what a concept! It certainly makes you think in the "here and the now".
If you follow a normal random walk for a very long time, you start seeing "normal" behavior -- the small steps cannot be seen, and the overall motion is determined by the average affect of all of the steps.
For a Lévy flight, the overall position is nearly completely determined by the long, rare steps -- the "flights" -- and thus there is no averaging out of the individual steps.
At the bottom of this page are the normal and Lévy walks for 10000 steps. Those same walks, followed for 100000 steps, are shown here:
Which is why I'm being a hard **** about "low" price. Like I said before, and what motorway has talked about, what matters is where the price is in context for the timescale we are trading. For investors in late '07, they were taking a horrible price, but for a day trader it would have completely irrelevant. I'm confident that most if not all examples of good trades posted would be what I consider a low price.
Feel free to post examples, after all, I am here to learn. For now I will address the highlighted text.
"and a good price is always a low price"
You have no idea how low or high a price is at the time of the trade.
Only in hindsite.
Why do you disagree? The later we get into a move, the less profit range there is to capture. Whether a price is low or high is relative to the move/timescale being traded. I believe few examples you post would be a high price, from my perspective.
but it does
Here I was saying that trading isn't as simple as making a random entry in the direction of a trend. Are you suggesting that it doesn't matter and that entries are not important?
Edit, tech, I don't care about statements. Your examples don't have to have been real trades.
"buy low sell high" is a cliche that is as ridiculous as "buy high and sell higher". i would argue that the later is a tad more right then the first though.
the hypothesis behind buy high and sell higher is that we should only buy in uptrends
we want good entry points compared to a previous position on the chart.
The random Walk is not and almost never can be a Stock chart
The Levy Walk is much closer to a Stock chart
Levy walk + memory is most like a stock ( any market ) chart
WHY THE MEAN IS NOT GOLDEN
and why ,TRENDS MATTER very much indeed..
motorway
the hypothesis behind buy high and sell higher is that we should only buy in uptrends, so as traders we will most probably always miss the the lowest low (the "bottom"). so buy high and sell higher is considered to be more right as we will buy high, in turn to make sure we do not experience losses of capital while waiting for the final low to take place (buying low in the downtrend). we're simply riding the primary wave of the uptrend.
the only thing that matters is the time involved and the point on the chart. as traders we want good entry points compared to a previous position on the chart. traders shouldn't care if the price is low, high, or in the middle. if the pattern as you view it looks good to make some profits we should take the trade, who cares if the price is 2 or 10.
You can mark any point on that chart, and it is probably possible that at some timeframe it is in fact a low price.
Yes, and my argument is that any good entry we do take is a low price, whether or not we may perceive it as low. You can mark any point on that chart, and it is probably possible that at some timeframe it is in fact a low price. The problem is people look at that chart and see the obvious movement there, rather than considering what may be happening on slower or faster timeframes. Many prices that would appear "high" on the chart would be "low" on a faster chart.
Here is the Equity chart up until it was shut down (All trades exited at a period of time).
wonderrman said:my point is a "low" or "high" price of a stock doesn't really matter at all. who cares if the price is low or high, as long as the chart works it doesn't really matter one iota if if the price is a low one or high one.
tech said:Which one/s are best lows to buy?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?