RichKid
PlanYourTrade > TradeYourPlan
- Joined
- 18 June 2004
- Posts
- 3,031
- Reactions
- 5
Lucifer_au said:Anyway heres some free resource of Van Tharp’s: http://www.yourproductteam.com/vti/tutorials.htm
tech/a said:Rich.
Sorry just saw this thread,I suppose an answer back in Janurary would have been better.
Van Tharps methodology(Money Management principals) are applicable to ANY trading system or method.Be it mechanical or discretionary.
The application of those principals are most definately used in the developement of T/T.
VanTharp doenst disclose a trading method rather the principals of sound moneymanagement which will ensure profit.
The way YOU apply those M/M principals in the end will be chosen by the trader.
Its basically very simple--- Cut Losses and let Profits run---.
Im happy to work with you and all here in developing another method which we can test and trade live like we have been doing with T/T for the last 3 yrs.
Starting from scratch and introducing many of Van Tharps principals.
For ideas on Systems Developement I suggest
Trading Systems and Methods by Kuafman a degree in Mathmatics is handy!
(I dont have one--unfortunately My son Kris fortunately has one).
The Encyclopedia of Technical Market Indicators by Colby is another gold mine.
Im off again in June for a few weeks to Singapore but happy to get things kicked off if there is a decient interest.
A larger interest gives better feedback and more minds participating.
If there are also other Amibroker or Metastock/Tradesim users around that will also be a great help.
Anyway Rich Ill leave it to you to kick it off.
Did you get my snail mail? and is all OK.
tech/a said:Rich a couple of things.
Trading futures or atleast developing positive expectancy models to trade, is easier than designing a method for trading a portfolio of stocks.
Simply your dealing with ONE entity not a potfolio of 10 or more and a universe of 100s.
You can also OPTIMISE your methodology on a singular entity.Not so on a portfolio as one optimisation for one isnt the same for another.
This can be done for a singular stock in a stand alone tradig method. (But thats another topic).
I think your choice of trading in a discretionary manner is a common error.
If you look carefully at your reason for this "Idea" Im sure youll be honest with yourself and say that by trading in a discretionary manner you have thet "False" sence of security that you can---react to the market to better enter and lock in profit--
Infact this is probably one of THE reasons that most fail.
There well laid plans of action become reactionary Guessing of market action.
You cannot test positive expectancy of a discretionary method either so your never going to be sure of profitability.
It really is SIMPLE.
This is ALL you need in any trading method.
An Entry
An Exit
A Stop
A postitive expectancy.
RichKid said:I have tried to read Ryan Jones (the trading game) but it's hard going but he introduces some great concepts. Van Tharp is good but as you mention he doesn't tell us all (you need to buy his cd's and other 'porducts' to get a run down). So many futures trading books on money mgmt but few for non-leveraged (eg non-margined) traders like me- not sure what the difference is as they keep talking in 'contracts' rather than a portfolio of diverse stocks.
mit said:Besides the audience in America being Commodity traders another reason is that position sizing for futures is more complicated.
For example the most common (but not always the best) money management technique is fixed fractional. This is where you look at your entry price and your stop and buy enough shares so that loss is a fixed percentage of your capital most usually 1-2%.
So if you have 100k you may risk 2% on a trade which is $2000. If your stop is 20 cents from your entry you then buy 2000/0.20 or 10,000 shares. If you portfolio goes up to 101k then you can buy 10,100 shares.
Future contracts are harder. The minimum movement (pip) for our dear old SPI is $25 per contract. If your stop is 20 pips you would lose $500 per contract. So with $100k and 2% risk you can buy 4 contracts. However, as you can't buy a part of a contract you would need to have $125k to be able to have 5 contracts. If you lose $1k to 99k you could only have 3 contracts. As shares are 1c a pip or less you don't get this problem.
So some of the stuff in money management texts is a way of getting around this problem. If you can filter this out then the rest is applicable to shares.
MIT
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?