I like your style Bronte but I don't see any big numbers
How about significant numbers..??!
To continue your point, in a very broad sense every additional 500 pts on the SPI seems to have had a pull back of some form to its original level. 5500 here we come. :aus:
Hey Bronte ive just got to say the first page of this thread is hilarious keep up the good work! Big numbers as in milestone as in psychological barriers or support im sure people trade these everyday when stocks pushes past or breaks through them if thats what you mean?
Bronte...great to hear from you again, i was thinking of you on the way home last nite...wondering...where did she go? Figured we hear something soon, given the approach to 6400..uncanny really isn't it. So when did you go short?
Cheers,
PS, those gaps usually get filled don't they? Will you fade that too?
Bronte...great to hear from you again, i was thinking of you on the way home last nite...wondering...where did she go? Figured we hear something soon, given the approach to 6400..uncanny really isn't it. So when did you go short?Cheers,
PS, those gaps usually get filled don't they? Will you fade that too?
I've read the livermore book, very good read, so are we to assume that whoever gets to $100 1st will either resist there or if it goes over then it will fly?
Howdy Uncle Festivus,
Yes 13500 would be a big enough number for us to trade off.
Trading Record "Big Number" Resistance is easy enough.
Just remember and adhere to your mathematics.
Thats calling the "big number" after the fact. Why 6400? LOL this thread sitting here all this time waiting for an answer to my question... and waiting for the market to turn at any round number and SHAZAM! a big number.
Why not 6300 or 6500?
"Round Numbers" on the other hand, are a well known phenominon. But would still like to see the theory tested statistically. I don't see it that much in what I trade... not enough to more reliable than MACD or other such indicator.
If ypu wish to humble me just come up with some statistical "big numbers"
The SPI turned at 6401. But the SPI is a derivitive of the SP200 cash index which did not get to 6400 or a BIG number... Neither did the all-ords. So why does the SPI count as a big number but not the Actual cash indices?
Why would the index turn at a big number anyway? Do all these people with NAB, BHP and WPL think "Oh crap! The SPI has hit 6400... better sell now!"?
I can see the psychology in an individual name like "I'm holding Google till $400" and enough people thinking the same, But I still don't see it often enough, or significant enough to really take that much notice.
Why wasn't 1,500 resistance on the SP500? That's a nice round number? Why didn,t nasdaq stop at 2,500? I could pull up many more examples where BIG number mean nothing.