Normal
Re: Technical Trading Exercise---Discretionary, (Pavilion103 & tech/a)Tech/PavAaaha - A light bulb moment for me, for sure.From your previous posts I understood to be proactive and skew the results into my favour by lifting the initial stop loss (1 Risk) towards or to breakeven fairly quickly to reduce our initial risk.I was skewing the initial risk BUT NOT the exit, doing both does make a big difference on results as you say.I know the exercise I've done below is very basic but it does illustrates your point of being proactive both ends, start of the trade and end of the trade.If I tossed a coin 2 times for 1 win and 1 loss (50% Win Rate)Won $1 for the win and lost $1 for the loss (1:1 Profit Ratio)That's breakeven trading putting all other costs aside for the time being.If I could then skew the results by reducing that initial risk down to half, it would mean I only lost .50 cents and still had my $1 win. So Win Rate was still 50% but my Profit Ratio was now 2:1 because I'm now winning twice as much as I was losing. This now has me above the breakeven line.But now, if I can skew the exit (light bulb for me) and improve this $1 win to say $1.50 the results are very good.Win Rate still 50%, now winning $1.50 and losing .50 cents which pushes my Profit Ratio out to 3:1.A very good system indeed.I know we probably won't get a 50% reduction on our initial risk and a improvement of 50% on our winnings as in the perfect world but I get the idea of skewing both ends and see that it does have a dramatic affect on the end results.We might or might not get a 3:1 system but it does get us away from that breakeven line.I get it! I look forward to your charts and ideas on skewing both ends.Thanks again Tech and Pav, appreciate your work.PS. Do you trade long and short?
Re: Technical Trading Exercise---Discretionary, (Pavilion103 & tech/a)
Tech/Pav
Aaaha - A light bulb moment for me, for sure.
From your previous posts I understood to be proactive and skew the results into my favour by lifting the initial stop loss (1 Risk) towards or to breakeven fairly quickly to reduce our initial risk.
I was skewing the initial risk BUT NOT the exit, doing both does make a big difference on results as you say.
I know the exercise I've done below is very basic but it does illustrates your point of being proactive both ends, start of the trade and end of the trade.
If I tossed a coin 2 times for 1 win and 1 loss (50% Win Rate)
Won $1 for the win and lost $1 for the loss (1:1 Profit Ratio)
That's breakeven trading putting all other costs aside for the time being.
If I could then skew the results by reducing that initial risk down to half, it would mean I only lost .50 cents and still had my $1 win. So Win Rate was still 50% but my Profit Ratio was now 2:1 because I'm now winning twice as much as I was losing. This now has me above the breakeven line.
But now, if I can skew the exit (light bulb for me) and improve this $1 win to say $1.50 the results are very good.
Win Rate still 50%, now winning $1.50 and losing .50 cents which pushes my Profit Ratio out to 3:1.
A very good system indeed.
I know we probably won't get a 50% reduction on our initial risk and a improvement of 50% on our winnings as in the perfect world but I get the idea of skewing both ends and see that it does have a dramatic affect on the end results.
We might or might not get a 3:1 system but it does get us away from that breakeven line.
I get it! I look forward to your charts and ideas on skewing both ends.
Thanks again Tech and Pav, appreciate your work.
PS. Do you trade long and short?
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.