there's a distinction between a vague philosophical (or even an on-point philosophical) visualization
and that is that the visualizer anticipates the person receiving the message understands the details and subtle nuances within
of course, puting aside the idea that the message may merely be posturing or grand-standing
in the instance the receiver understands what is being said then the receiver is unlikely to need to receive anything at all
and while affirmative banter is one thing, education, especially a thoroughly investigative education, that takes into account
not just the financial cost but the emotional risk of the reciever,
that's the area most people tip their
hats to but never have follow-thru and this is extremely dangerous
so, first, how do we dissect what is being said and what the motivation for saying whatever it is
not like a psychobabble way, i mean, in a useful and practical way, to build a series of tools
given the platform of text and pictures and the immediacy of this.....
if you look at the quotes, what is it that is really being said?
one cannot in any measure build an accountable way, or method of trading,
when one is in limbo-land from
mid-stream moments of other ideas from other posters .....no matter what great intentions are coming most of the time the people
who need the most help are hindered with cloudy pseudo stuff in parcels wrapped in further mystery...
you have one poster on this thread who asked hard and straight questions
So is the world against you or is it that your favorable setups are actually rubbish?
the response was
I have found that it isn't for me
these two quotes clearly dictate two states of being
not two states of opinion; two states of being
asking incisive question to arrive at concise answers to arrive at new ideas
that are useable that can create realizable results and personal accountability
the second person has responded with an answer that is fine in itself, in that,
that is the place the poster is emotively given to
....it is not a place to be judged, rather to be vigorously
probed to see if the reason with that disposition
is merely based on a lack of knowledge .....many people simply screw up their accounts because they fear looking dumb or do not know what
questions to ask or how to ask them...there's always discomfort when the original basis of the journey is not based on itself but some other motive.
to get to points of recognition at speed, one must ask direct questions and further, I say, must rigorously dissect anything that washes over the very things that require inspection,
this, I think, is true of all forums...a bit of this a bit of that, everything becomes a bit of a wash
that is, of course, my humble opinion ....and may i offer that i have traded for at least as long as I have been a member of this forum
also an opinion, just an opinion, that quitting is the point of outward action of an inner recognition arrived at long before the act
of quitting occurred, that a return must be based on a new set of personal accountable
rules or guidelines, that the real drivers of involvement be clear and concise...that quitting is the recognition of a new path,
opens a new doorway.....
your success is not for someone else to recognize as much as it is not theirs to enact for you,
that success can be framed in two words; responsibility and accountability
when one decides to give up one of those to an emotive disposition
the probabilities are that the original journey is fulfilled.
and responsibility toward other people is often under-weighted, in that, you post with an idea that posting it carries implied knowledge,
yet fail to ask reasonable questions, without knowing the scope of the recipients education or experience, so, how can one really take on
another persons ideas when so many underlying questions need clarity first before any type of dialogue ensues....
be clear about this: your words carry weight
as has always been true, piece-meal posts are the least helpful, including this one in many respects, in that, again, for the recipient to
fully grasp all the concepts (text form) the recipient must already have a clear understanding of the mechanics, constraints, avenues and
maliable ideas involved ...in other words, that person need already be fully educated to then go on and grasp the finer parts that are still
unknown (and i'm not saying experience, as that is itself a different thing)
clearly, when there is no conversation that uncovers either posters depth of knowledge and experience then the ensuing conversation is a cobblestone bikeride
in the quotes, one is reaching for clarity, the other is reaching for a pillow
this forum is a trading forum
I say, there are several effective traders who come here to read this forum and rarely speak, I'll tell you why,
it's nothing to do with you stealing their ideas or how effective they are as traders
it is that they understand the power of their own words and the energy required to have a full and clear conversation that not only takes you
forward, that missing parts are far more dangerous than the known parts are an advantage, that they accept responsibility for their words
that they know many people are not here to learn in its' essence, rather, confuse rigorous debate and knowledge with coffee and biscuits
and that incisive debate is not about posturing or looking good
you may need to re-read some parts due to the language I have used here
much work needs to be done before any "technical analysis" and a conversation for another thread, probably