Hi all (tech/a),
My memory is a bit vague, but a few years ago when I started looking at share trading I had a look at the system that I think was on reefcap (??), that was the published results of a trading system that had performed well.
There were many many pages of discussion on the system. I am now getting to a position of putting a system together myself and was trying to find this old post, but I cannot seem to find it (some pages on google referring to it no longer link there). Is it still around and can anyone point me to it?
Many Thanks
AndyKM
http://www.thechartist.com.au/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=postlist&Board=53&page=1
I found tech/a's system and the associated discussion very useful for my own system development.
Im sure you will too.
Thanks Nizar, hope you understand, thems the rulz!
If I'm taking part in a discussion and Ive left an example on another site rather than re write the whole thing again,I'll refer to where it is.
In my testing I've found that during big corrections like May 06 and Aug 07 that when testing on stocks universes that included much smaller cap stocks eg. the XAO or the entire market, that open equity drawdowns are likely to be much greater.
Actually ASX thats not it.
An important element in the entry is missing.
You dont happen to know any others do you?
Oh Andy if you have any questions regarding T/T or any other longterm system ASX will I'm sure be kind enough to answer for you.
Yes we all did,thats why its designed the way it is.
In the biggest corrective move so far over $300,000 was liquidated out of the market.
Perhaps you'd like to comment on that ASX,but then again there are 100s of pages of discussion,Formula's,questions,statistics and records here--
I think worth commenting on is the fact that this system is fictitious, in the sense that it wasn't traded by the designer as it has been paper-traded in the public domain. The paper-traded version might have liquidated as much but the designer has declared that they dumped their entire portfolio on several occasions before the system was allowed to work. The mechanics of a systems is one thing...can YOU actually follow it, that's something else.
Of course I forgot...haha, yes, you need to hold your tongue just right before you click 'buy'.
Of course I do...there a lots of very good ideas out there. Cobble some of the best together and you might just have a system of your own.
Just keeping it real tech/a. You and I both know it's not the be all and end all of systems. If you can't take it being critiqued and analysed for it's strengths and weaknesses you should never have put it up in the public domain.
I think worth commenting on is the fact that this system is fictitious, in the sense that it wasn't traded by the designer as it has been paper-traded in the public domain. The paper-traded version might have liquidated as much but the designer has declared that they dumped their entire portfolio on several occasions before the system was allowed to work. The mechanics of a systems is one thing...can YOU actually follow it, that's something else.
Entry trigger:
* Buy at tomorrow's open when today's high crosses the highest high of the last 10 days.
I had that one. IMO this trigger combined with the 70-day HHV setup is the best part of the system. It's quite clever the way that it ensures the stock much be forming higher highs, not just breaking out.
I didn't chose to use it myself because I didn't want to find myself trading in the wake of other TechTraders or derivative systems. That aside it's a cute feature.
Hmm I'll refrain from posting ASF references on other sites then.
............
Tech/a. I notice a few system subscription sites popping up and wondered if you had near term plans of doing so yourself? I had a look at Aussie Stock Forum poster TECM website where they send alerts for ASX200 and/or DOW30 to paying subscribers.
No not that thing.No
The system is fully disclosed all one has to do is load the formula to Metastock/ Amibroker or Bullcharts and there you have all the trade triggers for the day searched.
No not that thing.
dont need to.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?