New posts

Reply to thread

Message

Snake.

(1)Its pretty obvious some dont trade.
OR
(2)Some simply analyse
OR
(3)Some dont make consistent profit---anyone can have a winning trade.
OR
(4)Some have no idea about application of analysis---any form of analysis.
OR
(5)A combination of the above.

If they did they wouldnt be making points which clearly point to the above conclusions.
Dont get me wrong some here do consistently make profit and clearly they dont post rubbish.

Others just dont add to the board at all.No explaination,no example to support views just parrot fashion,from what they have read.They've never implemented anything with consistency into their trading.
Whats the value of the initial post from $$Magnet$$ ?? Forget this forget that
Ive been doing this for 13 yrs and your all on the wrongside of the trade.
Maybe so but whats the value to the forum in telling all that you've been on the right side 3 weeks after the event.

My post to Coyotte wasnt/isnt a challenge to him or anyone---its a serious suggestion.
You'd be suprised what you'd learn if you posted your (or anyone did) trading out in the open. Let me tell you it keeps you honest. Ive had 100s of eyes dissect T/T over 4 yrs each and everyone who have given constructive input or constructive critisism have added to my and many others knowledge.
We/I question what we do and how we do it.

Ive had my fair share of run ins with GANN practitioners.They work like many other on Prove--disprove analysis. But AS YET Ive not seen practical application of the method.Calling 5 or 6 possible dates or points of interest are a far cry from practical application. Show me how you apply the 5 or 6 dates into your trading-----just do it on 6 stocks or 6 times on an index.
That would be adding to the forum. Not to prove you can trade but that the analysis is worth the time and effort to learn and can be APPLIED in realtime trading.

My view while un-palatable to some generates debate. Hey I learn a lot from these threads---am I the only one?

<blockquote data-quote="tech/a" data-source="post: 137224" data-attributes="member: 257">Snake.(1)Its pretty obvious some dont trade.OR(2)Some simply analyseOR(3)Some dont make consistent profit---anyone can have a winning trade.OR(4)Some have no idea about application of analysis---any form of analysis.OR(5)A combination of the above.If they did they wouldnt be making points which clearly point to the above conclusions.Dont get me wrong some here do consistently make profit and clearly they dont post rubbish.Others just dont add to the board at all.No explaination,no example to support views just parrot fashion,from what they have read.They&#039;ve never implemented anything with consistency into their trading.Whats the value of the initial post from $$Magnet$$ ?? Forget this forget thatIve been doing this for 13 yrs and your all on the wrongside of the trade.Maybe so but whats the value to the forum in telling all that you&#039;ve been on the right side 3 weeks after the event.My post to Coyotte wasnt/isnt a challenge to him or anyone---its a serious suggestion.You&#039;d be suprised what you&#039;d learn if you posted your (or anyone did) trading out in the open. Let me tell you it keeps you honest. Ive had 100s of eyes dissect T/T over 4 yrs each and everyone who have given constructive input or constructive critisism have added to my and many others knowledge.We/I question what we do and how we do it.Ive had my fair share of run ins with GANN practitioners.They work like many other on Prove--disprove analysis. But AS YET Ive not seen practical application of the method.Calling 5 or 6 possible dates or points of interest are a far cry from practical application. Show me how you apply the 5 or 6 dates into your trading-----just do it on 6 stocks or 6 times on an index.That would be adding to the forum. Not to prove you can trade but that the analysis is worth the time and effort to learn and can be APPLIED in realtime trading. My view while un-palatable to some generates debate. Hey I learn a lot from these threads---am I the only one?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tech/a, post: 137224, member: 257"] [B]Snake.[/B] (1)Its pretty obvious some dont trade. OR (2)Some simply analyse OR (3)Some dont make consistent profit---anyone can have a winning trade. OR (4)Some have no idea about application of analysis---any form of analysis. OR (5)A combination of the above. If they did they wouldnt be making points which clearly point to the above conclusions. Dont get me wrong some here do consistently make profit and clearly they dont post rubbish. [B]Others just dont add to the board at all.[/B]No explaination,no example to support views just parrot fashion,from what they have read.They've never implemented anything with consistency into their trading. Whats the value of the initial post from $$Magnet$$ ?? Forget this forget that Ive been doing this for 13 yrs and your all on the wrongside of the trade. Maybe so but whats the value to the forum in telling all that you've been on the right side 3 weeks after the event. My post to Coyotte wasnt/isnt a challenge to him or anyone---[B]its a serious suggestion.[/B] You'd be suprised what you'd learn if you posted your (or anyone did) trading out in the open. Let me tell you it keeps you honest. Ive had 100s of eyes dissect T/T over 4 yrs each and everyone who have given constructive input or constructive critisism have added to my and many others knowledge. We/I question what we do and how we do it. Ive had my fair share of run ins with GANN practitioners.They work like many other on Prove--disprove analysis. But AS YET Ive not seen practical application of the method.Calling 5 or 6 possible dates or points of interest are a far cry from practical application. Show me how you apply the 5 or 6 dates into your trading-----just do it on 6 stocks or 6 times on an index. That would be adding to the forum. Not to prove you can trade but that the analysis is worth the time and effort to learn and can be APPLIED in realtime trading. My view while un-palatable to some generates debate. Hey I learn a lot from these threads---am I the only one? [/QUOTE]

Verification