- Joined
- 8 November 2005
- Posts
- 12
- Reactions
- 0
Do most undervalued stock tend to become fairly valued by the market price increasing to the valuator price?
any identifiable time frame? eg 6 months, 1-2 yr etc. What about the reverse?
Is it suitable to generate a universe of stocks to trade long term eg. 6-18 mths?
Or is it just a good way to select stocks to give to your grandkids !
... I think the core concept is finding profitable companies who reinvest their earnings back into the company, ideally at a similar high ROE, rather than neccessarily looking for high dividend payout ratio stocks. So in theory strong profitable companies are found. Also the author doesn't suggest buying on valuation alone, but to consider purchase in context of current economic circumstances & company news etc.I doubt some software program can do it for you automatically.
If I was you I would not buy a software program to find stocks. I'd spend $50 on buying a book on value investing. I recommend Ben Graham's "Intelligent Investor". It is fairly heavy reading though.
Did you only hear about this on the radio or other places as well?
poormantrading said:... Do most undervalued stock tend to become fairly valued by the market price increasing to the valuator price? any identifiable time frame? eg 6 months, 1-2 yr etc. What about the reverse? do many become" fair valued" by the value decling to market price?
I found looking at stocks from that perspective interesting.... a lot of food for thought.I can also say that it's intended to identify businesses rather than stocks.
okeydokely!Feel free to ask
I haven't counted them, but that looks about right. You can add your own and delete some of theirs if you want. I certainly will.poormantrading said:I tried the demo, but it expired before I got a chance to understand how it works. Is the following correct?
- In one of the books it mentions 300 stocks in the database. Is that all there is??
No I don't know, though I have guesses about some. At the moment, in the brief times between watching or recovering from soccer I'm working my way through the financials I can find for some of the stocks in the database to see where and why I come to different results and what information they've used that I can't find. You might not need or want to go through this process; I'm doing it because I have a LOT to learn about reading company accounts.If so do you know what is the selection criteria to be included in the database?
That's right, though I wouldn't put it quite that way. The "custom fields" are either for data from the financial reports or are calculations based on the data. Some people on this forum have built their own systems with custom fields that suit their investing/trading systems. That's what StockVal is.- the fundamental data is not just a straight feed from say Aspect(?) Data, but they add a few custom fields of their own by trolling through the notes of Annual Reports to get a more accurate economic value of the companies.
Erm... I'm not sure what you're asking with this. Do you mean, how many undervalued stocks are there in the database? The answer is "it depends", not just on prices but also because you might want to use different figures in some of the calculations. When you're working from value calculations you can't just update information from stockmarket activity.How frequently are undervalued stocks identified?
Not within SV. I have seen some of Roger Montgomery's examples; The Reject Shop and ABC Learning are two that he uses a lot, as you probably know.Have you seen any historical valuations generated by SV to compare to current prices?
At least one person on the forum uses intrinsic value in a trading system. I think all these ferocious distinctions get pretty fuzzy when you put them into practice. I've decided that for now I'll worry about establishing a method that works for me; checkpoints and guidelines are much more important to me than what it's called.Despite what Buffett & FA's might say I would think it would he useful to use TA to manage the trade/investment ... maybe none of them have read the posts here on ASF to understand how to apply TA!I don't want to fully subscribe to the cult of Buffettology! :sheep:
It doesn't. The program does calculations based on data and opinions. The subscription provides the data and opinions for a number of companies, and includes information about how the data is derived. e.g. if there's more than one class of shares there's a note about what is included in the field for number of shares on issue. It doesn't make recommendations. It's a tool for developing your own informed opinions.Realist said:Ghoti, what stocks (companies) does it recommend?
I sure as heck wouldn't recommend anything except ignoring any of my recommendations. I *might* warn a good friend against something; I certainly wouldn't suggest that they put money into anything.What stocks/companies have you bought recently or would you recommend now yourself?
As you suggested elsewhere, I've gone back to Graham this week. I think that discussion belongs in a different thread.Just interested as you follow Grahams methodologies - as I try to. See if we are thinking the same things.
I don't have a first-hand opinion. Some people whose opinions I often find useful think it's a solid company.The last "value" stock I bought was CDO. What do you think of them?
.. fully understandable!Sorry about the delay. Damn soccer gets in the way of a lot of things eh?
poormantrading said:Thanks 4 the info ghotib, I'll look again into Reject Shop and ABC Learning.
.. fully understandable!
Regards
It doesn't scan the market, if that's what you mean. The licensed version contains data for about 300 companies, and that data is updated periodically (not daily). The data is not only figures; it's also analysts' notes, including comments on the figures, but the analysts are not identified. You can enter data for as many other companies as you want, but finding the data is up to you. The most frequently updated data is share price (obviously - nothing else changes so fast). I don't know if StockVal updates share price for companies that it doesn't provide other data for; easy to test but I haven't done it yet.Is this good software to assist in getting information to select a stock?
ghotib said:Hi ggumpshots - any relation to Forrest?
If you've read this thread you'll know that I've had a subscription to StockVal for about 3 months. You'll also know that there's a new version due Real Soon Now.
The learning curve for the software is barely noticeable. However, the learning curve for what it does is long. The program looks to me as if it's built on a spreadsheet, probably Excel, which performs the calculations and displays the results. You can't modify the formulae, but you can enter your own data. The learning curve is in understanding what data goes in so you understand what the calculated valuations are about. If you're already comfortable with company accounts and intrinsic value calculations, I think you'd learn StockVal very quickly. If you don't, I think it would be difficult to learn those things well enough to from StockVal alone.
By your analogy, if you've already an expert tennis player then you don't have much to learn when you pick up your new carbon fibre racquet, but you might need to adjust your technique to make the most of it. If you got the new racquet for your first ever tennis lesson, then you have to learn the rules of the game, how to make strokes, all the physical skills and co-ordination, tactics, shot percentages, court behaviour etc. etc. using the racquet is only a small part of all that.
It doesn't scan the market, if that's what you mean. The licensed version contains data for about 300 companies, and that data is updated periodically (not daily). The data is not only figures; it's also analysts' notes, including comments on the figures, but the analysts are not identified. You can enter data for as many other companies as you want, but finding the data is up to you. The most frequently updated data is share price (obviously - nothing else changes so fast). I don't know if StockVal updates share price for companies that it doesn't provide other data for; easy to test but I haven't done it yet.
Does that help???
Ghoti
Hi Woodyggumpshots said:Hi Ghotib,
Im Woody, my older brother is forrest.
I had a bit of a look but it's changed since I got my copy. Sorry.I am really interested in this but I keep getting a Reuters link. This
product is in conjunction with Montgomery from clime ....right???
Maybe its because am I not located in OZ I cant get the demo.....is there one. Can you assist with a free demo link?
FWIW, I bought it on a special offer to Clime shareholders; I didn't pay $1200. It's worth the money to me. I will not make any recommendations, either for or against, for anyone else, but I will say that I'm glad to have it because I'm using it to ensure that when I buy I buy low enough to protect my capital.What stands out about your reply is that you don't comment on how
successful or unsuccessful the $1200 is ,you have spent on getting the
software and data. Is it worth it?
This sounds ridiculous, but I don't know how many companies there are and I don't really care. Every few days I open it up and download the update. Then I sort by valuation less price and maybe take a look at things that appear to be priced below valuation. Generally I find I'm not interested in them at any price, but I have bought into one company that I hadn't thought about before. StockVal valued KRS at 17c, and I bought it for 17c a couple of months ago. That's contrary to theory: I should be buying for less than valuation. OTOH the valuation assumes a 16% rate of return, so I'm still pretty safe. Just at the moment I'm also very comfortable - SP is 22c, they're in an on-market share buyback (which I presume is affecting the SP), and they've just declared a 1c dividend with increased profit on decreased revenue.I thought about 2 companies a day were being added and there were 400 companies now…is that incorrect? Is that enough companies for me to loose million or make a million? hahahaha
Some have commented to me that it is mathematically flawed, but then
they tried to sell me their product!
You sound about the same as I am - confused?In terms of understanding financial statements I am lousy, however I
would like to.
I have a few Ben Grahams books and read a lot of Buffet
type books previously
and am not a novice to investing...just not successful on the
ASX or NASDEQ. sh!?
Would this software help someone not completly familar with the financials.
Can I just select the parameters even though I may not undesrtand every single input exactly.
Does it at the end of the day recommend a stock ,
if you put in several parameters.
Thanks for your long reply.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?