This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

SDV - SciDev Limited

Hi Atomic5,

"Pity people who bought JRV at 3c" you say. When playing with specs you have got to be very careful and understand the risks involved. INL have made a pretty good profit out of the exercise and helped increase JRV's share price. I can only remember a couple of months back when it was around the 1c mark. I don't hold any INL or JRV shares.
DYOR
 

Those years at Macquarie have served you well.

Did you say for free? At no net cost? Entry price of less than zero?
 

this is very encouraging news (which should have been price sensitive) - why hasn't the market reacted - I know the market can be irrational sometimes but I must say its getting ridiculous!
 
More good news! Agree, though maybe not price-sensitive in that most of it has been flagged previously - except move to 22% of BSM.
However, I think the market impact of the ann has been muffled by inclusion of this positive detail under a substantial shareholder notice heading. Many market watchers do not even open such notices.
I have been surprised that INL has not jumped higher in the last couple of days given the JRV bargain-buy notice, this good progress report, and firming zinc market........
Could be a good time to stock up....
 
I am an INL shareholder and have been for over 3 years so I am therefore very biased. Remember that!
Despite what JRV shareholders say INL's in and out play was brilliant. 8% of JRV at less than zero cost. INL has its own Ni process and was looking for a deposit to treat. JRV did not want to go that way. INL therefore sold much of its holding but has stayed with JRV as the major shareholder for free. INL may yet get to treat JRV ore if the Chinese don't come on board. INL can't lose. INL has already covered all its costs.
INL's holding in Bass Metals is also brilliant as it is picking up shares at well less than present market value. INL will also more than likely treat BSM ore and, beside getting revenue from that source, will improve its Zn/Pb concentrate going to China. A higher percentage concentrate means a lower cost of transport per tonne.
I agree that yesterday's announcement should have stirred the market but didn't. I think the stir will come with the release of the BFS which was due "before the end of the current quarter". In other words today! As usual with INL the announcement is late. It appears as though Worley Parsons has not yet finished the BFS.
Intec may be based at Sydney Uni but its personnel are not uni staff. Having met all directors and research staff I can say that all are truly professional and dedicated to furthering the Company.
 
Biased?? I call that very intelligent & insightful reasoning. Would appreciate it if you also snapped up a couple of million shares this afternoon to show just how strongly you feel.....
 
Hey Mango, INL obviously being depressed by uncertainty towards Zinc price in medium term due to potential supply response. What do you see as a reasonable SP if Zn remains between 3K and 3.5K USD, and production targets are met??ie, a ballpark price for INL?
 
Hi Col Lector.
I would love to be able to buy more INL but my finances don't allow it. Not even $500 worth which is the minimum through CommSec.

As for a predicted share price only a fool tries to put a value on a share. I have been in the stock market for well over 10 years and I have seen share prices go down when reports are good and share prices go up when reports are bad. Such is the fickelness of the market.

INL has put out its own predictions on revenue and return from the JV with PMS and the figures stack up.

It is the BFS that I am really interested in.
 
Fair enough Mango. I also see as a buy at these levels.... in fact in the queue at present at .175 to build on present holding.
When BFS does come out.... some in market may be scared by the potential capital costs?? Or maybe/hopefully will see INL's scope & opportunity to diversify from current Zinc conc focus.
 
The capital cost of the new polymetallic plant was expected to be about $US 135 million. That was before the demand for labour and materials increased. However with a known ore deposit with a life of 22 years, ability to process EAF dust which is obtained for free (and even a cash credit), the ownership of the Zeehan slag heap, agreements with Ford Motor Co for scrap, the new mill will have a life well past 22 years. Therefore the annual depreciation etc is not much in the way of things.
Add to the above the tailings from BSM, if INL and BSM agree to INL treating BSM ore.
 

I agree with your comments.
INL's sp has been locked in a down trend for a couple of months Re 27 day ma etc.
INL has a real chance of breaking out of that trend this week.
MACD has finnally turned up from a deep low, and it would only take a close a couple cents higher to change tech perspective on this company.Given the company Directors quiet understated comments of late, the next few week's could be interesting.
IMO worth a look.
holding inl longer term
 
Surely will find support around this level. Almost back to where I first bought it on breakout from the long term sideways move.

(not holding)

(bought on false break, and sold on failure)
 

Attachments

  • INL.gif
    37.3 KB · Views: 171
Surely will find support around this level. Almost back to where I first bought it on breakout from the long term sideways move.

(not holding)

(bought on false break, and sold on failure)

Nice to see you picked up my post, Funny but it was one of your comments to Gundini [just buy INL!] back in Nov-Dec, that created my initial interest in the stock.
Currently a couple cents out of the money, but happy to be holding.
Thanks
 
Ann out by JRV regarding INL merger proposals..........seems as though some ill feeling between the 2 co's and some rather big claims from Purcell regarding INL's ability to extract precious metals.

MB
 
Rather incorrect claims would be more to the point. Only 1500 tons per year through Hellyer? Don't know how that's possible when they are shipping 5000 tons of concentrate out of the plant A MONTH! Someone at JRV made a boo-boo, and I think they are going to pay dearly for it....
INL's smugness, before and after the deal, has JRV management fuming, by the sounds of this. INL may as well just dump the JRV shares at market and buy back their own...
 
I think that's zinc, not nickel.

From a neutral perspective, I can't see anything wrong with the announcement.
 
Actually, I re-read the ann. and it does say Burnie could only do 1500 tons per year, not Hellyer. Not sure about the truth in that statement, either though....
Hopefully we will see some sort of rebuttal from INL this afternoon, anyhow, whether it be an ann. or a major JRV sellout. Nothing like a little corporate drama on a Monday afternoon...
 
actually the building of the new plant can be as big as required - it has been stated that if demand was high - a 40ktpa plant could be built - are u blind Chops? JRV are pathetic amateurs with no hope of mining their deposit!!!!!!
 
actually the building of the new plant can be as big as required - it has been stated that if demand was high - a 40ktpa plant could be built - are u blind Chops? JRV are pathetic amateurs with no hope of mining their deposit!!!!!!

Could be but isn't. I don't particularly care, I don't hold either stock, I was just commenting on the statement. Didn't really appear to be anything shocking or massively out of line with what has been proven.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...