New posts

Reply to thread

Message

Realist

That's correct.
The reason for that is demonstrated within the laxity of your accuracy.

Again, mere opinion.
Rather than more opinion, why not a cognizent argument with some factual basis as to their weakness.

Again inaccurate.
I stated that at the price of $2.65, there would be a 50% discount from intrinsic value In addition, I provided a range, thus even $2.65 is an incorrect statement. Your lack of attention to detail delineates you as the speculator that you undoubtably are. In addition I stated before I would buy it not that there would be no takers for the stock.
True value investors would be waiting for lower prices, as of course, we can earn a better and safer return.

Because I was interested in seeing what you could bring to the party.
On the evidence offered so far, not seemingly a great deal.

jog on
d998

<blockquote data-quote="ducati916" data-source="post: 67736" data-attributes="member: 2975">Realist That&#039;s correct.The reason for that is demonstrated within the laxity of your accuracy.Again, mere opinion.Rather than more opinion, why not a cognizent argument with some factual basis as to their weakness.Again inaccurate.I stated that at the price of $2.65, there would be a 50% discount from intrinsic value In addition, I provided a range, thus even $2.65 is an incorrect statement. Your lack of attention to detail delineates you as the speculator that you undoubtably are. In addition I stated before I would buy it not that there would be no takers for the stock.True value investors would be waiting for lower prices, as of course, we can earn a better and safer return.Because I was interested in seeing what you could bring to the party.On the evidence offered so far, not seemingly a great deal.jog ond998</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ducati916, post: 67736, member: 2975"] [B]Realist[/B] That's correct. The reason for that is demonstrated within the laxity of your accuracy. Again, mere opinion. Rather than more opinion, why not a cognizent argument with some factual basis as to their weakness. Again inaccurate. I stated that at the price of [B]$2.65, there would be a 50% discount from intrinsic value[/B] In addition, I provided a range, thus even $2.65 is an incorrect statement. Your lack of attention to detail delineates you as the speculator that you undoubtably are. In addition I stated before [B]I would buy it[/B] not that there would be no takers for the stock. True value investors would be waiting for lower prices, as of course, we can earn a better and safer return. Because I was interested in seeing what you could bring to the party. On the evidence offered so far, not seemingly a great deal. jog on d998 [/QUOTE]

Verification