Julia said:And any "rating" of posts would be entirely subjective. You may rate a post highly whilst someone else would rate it towards the bottom on the quality scale.
I can see your point, Bob, but think it would be difficult to come up with a feasible alternative.
Julia
Prospector said:And would this post count as a quality post or a quantity post?
Bobby said:At the moment your rank: Is by your number of posts.
E.G.
0 - 99 Newbee
100 - 249 Junior member
250 - 499 Full member
500 - 999 Senior member
1000 - + Tech, RichKid -------- deserved !.
Now what I don't like is the fact that anyone can post & post & post .
Its the Quality of the posts, Not the quantity of posts that should determine ones rank.
This needs to be debated urgently !
Bob.
Joe Blow said:sam76 isn't banned, he's just having a bit of a lend of us.
I have the custom user title option enabled and sam has set his to 'Banned' as a joke.
Prospector said:There is a way to make me look more female but modesty prevailed
Prospector said:Ahh, that's better! There is a way to make me look more female but modesty prevailed and thought I would stick to the same principles as bullmarket has!
Yeah Sam, the banned had me fooled too - I kept thinking why is this guy allowed to keep posting?
Prospector said:I think I would be banned for real if I used it! Actually, it isnt an avatar but a combination of keystrokes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?