- Joined
- 23 August 2008
- Posts
- 227
- Reactions
- 0
I decided to buy today on good news. Turns out it was a good day to sell and boy did the selling come hard and fast.
Anybody else get killed today?
I decided to buy today on good news. Turns out it was a good day to sell and boy did the selling come hard and fast.
Anybody else get killed today?
There was good news today? Where?
Subject to transitional arrangements, the new rent-based tax should apply to existing projects, replacing existing charging arrangements. The allocation of revenue and risks from the new tax should be negotiated between the Australian and State governments. A cash bidding system could also be adopted to supplement the resource rent tax and promote the efficient allocation of exploration rights.
There's a bit of over-reaction happening here (and yes, I hold miners also).
There's a bit of over-reaction happening here (and yes, I hold miners also).
This has to get through the Senate yet, and this is imo very unlikely to happen without significant modification, especially given the fight the mining industry is going to mount.
If we want to do a Pollyanna on this and find a positive, there will be quite a few investors out there in voting land who will be blaming Rudd & Co. for the fall in their shares combined with the rise in their mortgage rate.
Coming on the same day as the fairly dramatic fall in Rudd's approval rating, the government must be having the first tremors of panic.
Same here, Julia;
I was tempted to dump the lot - but then reconsidered:
What if KRudd does (yet another) backflip and "explains" that he never meant to be that harsh - the introduction to be staggered over 5 years, maybe delayed (like ETS) etc... The result may well be an instant support - especially of those miners that earn the biggest part of their profits Overseas. Did you hear "Prof" Palmer and Tony Sage in tonight's News?
Yes, I'll continue to diversify - even more now than previously. But slaughter my mining stocks in panic I won't.
Because it is now more probable that a company's ability to generate distributable earnings in the future has reduced. When people buy shares, they do so in order to generate a return in the future, if that return is now reasonably assessed to be less than it was before this additional tax became probable, then it makes sense that people are willing to pay less for it.Even if the super tax passed the senate, i thought it was due to start in 2012? Why would shareholders be selling off now?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?