Here is the star in recession. I hope I have luck this time.
IMF (Australia) Ltd (formerly Insolvency Management Fund Limited) is a provider of funding and litigation support services to insolvency and legal practitioners.
the chart looks good. the business has at least 77c net asset value. If we are in
recession, the future of this is good. if we are not in recession 77c net asset backup is the safe line.
Date: 15/9/2008
Author: Anthony Klan
Source: The Australian --- Page: 27
The Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) has drawn renewedcriticism from consumer advocate Denise Brailey. She had in the past beeninstrumental in alerting the watchdog and other agencies as well as investors tothe risky practices of several property finance providers, and was the mainwhistleblower on the mortgage brokers scandal in Western Australia. Braileyswitched from her career in property to her advocate function with the RealEstate Consumer Association, and in that role also often levelled attacks atASIC for perceived inadequacies. In mid-2008 she applied for a position withASIC as a $A70,000-per-annum investigator, but neither of her two referees werecontacted by the employer. These were executive director of litigation fundinggroup IMF (Australia), Hugh McLernon, and Perth-based firm SolomonLawyers's partner, Doug Solomon
Date: 10/9/2008
Author: Anthony Klan
Source: The Australian --- Page: 3
IMF (Australia) described an offer to repay Firepower investors as"laughable" on 9 September 2008. IMF said a pledge byRomanian-Australian businessman, Frank Timis, to repay investors $A40 millionlost through the Firepower collapse was likely to amount to nothing. TheAustralian litigation funding giant is preparing to launch a class actionagainst Firepower associates
Date: 2/9/2008
Author: Stuart Wilson
Source: The Australian --- Page: 21
Investors are the winners in the out-of-court settlement deal reached with pokermachine manufacturer Aristocrat Leisure. Some 4,000 stockholders brought a classaction, bankrolled by IMF (Australia), against the company, and will share in apayment of $A144m. They had claimed to have been misled about Aristocrat'ssales, and Australian corporations must now be extra careful to comply withtheir disclosure obligations. Similar law suits, likely involving IMF but alsolaw firms Maurice Blackburn and Slater & Gordon, are certain to arise afterthe good outcome. However, there will not be the same volume of stockholderlegal actions as seen in the US, as in Australia costs can be awarded againstthem if they lose
Date: 29/8/2008
Author: Alex Boxsell
Source: The Australian Financial Review --- Page: 52
The resolution of a number of cases has lifted the profit of litigation funder,IMF Australia. It has posted a net profit after tax of $A17.2 million for2007-08, a rise of 188 per cent. The company is involved in two major classactions together with law firm, Maurice Blackburn, in August 2008
IMF share price just got hammered, down about 6 % or so. Any ideas why? I see no news. Was watching these to pick some up.
Gotta love market disclosure. Im starting to get really annoyed with the efficiency of the market.
I had a trade of 1000 shares executed at 1.805. Wanted to dip my toe in the water on this one and there was no news out, adverse or otherwise. But something is definitely going on.
IMF might be funding their own litigation agreement hehe.
Clearly something going on. Now down 16% on very high volume.
Many of their cases are in the public domain so if you don't know why, chances are you shouldn't be buying...
Gotta love market disclosure. Im starting to get really annoyed with the efficiency of the market. .
Chris Bowen, Corporate Law Minister, announced the proposed legislation this morning on ABC radio, and the market initially reacted to that. I guess this is a gentle reminder to us all that not everything gets revealed for the first time via ASX announcement.
As an IMF holder I know that wouldn't make you feel any better Nick, but IMHO IMF is essentially a litigation funder, and while in the longterm it may mean the types of matters IMF fund may change, there will always be potential litigants with strong cases and empty pockets... Short term, it is unlikely that this case will retrospectively affect current IMF matters, as noted in the (eventual) ASX ANN as well as in various news articles this afternoon.
As an IMF holder I know that wouldn't make you feel any better Nick, but IMHO IMF is essentially a litigation funder, and while in the longterm it may mean the types of matters IMF fund may change, there will always be potential litigants with strong cases and empty pockets... Short term, it is unlikely that this case will retrospectively affect current IMF matters, as noted in the (eventual) ASX ANN as well as in various news articles this afternoon.
Agreed - asa holder of IMF, IMO this will not drmatically affect the profit outlook for IMF, the govt cannot change the law retrospectively to make IMF lose the case...so no probs.... all cases are open to appeal, but this one seems to be done and dusted...
They have plenty in the pipeline, a bit flat for 2010 comapred to goal of doubling income, but strong leads lining up for 2011...
Yes IMF is litigation funder, but they get paid only when they win the case. Look across their case portfolio and they currently have heaps of cases related to disgruntle shareholders of collapsed companies against company directors etc. Given the ruling on Sons of G, the possibility of a positive outcome on these cases have significantly reduced imo. So at the minimum, the risk of success (and hence revenue / profit to IMF) has increased, so a mark down by the market is warranted.
Now whether the mark down has been overdone or not, that's another matter. My guess is no one really knows how to intelligently interpret the information yet and so we will see volatility short term stemming from this uncertainty.
Im sure if it materially affects IMF they will produce an announcment today...
Dump your IMF shares NOW!
I just realised that the MD of IMF is Hugh McLemon.
Huge mac-lemon people!
It is not material until the details are announced.
There is a radio interview with Huge Lemon this morning but sorry don't have a link. Basically says that decision unlikely to be retrospective (in which case it is not material), but if retrospective then it depends on the details. What he didn't say was if the details are bad then the prospects of their 3 current shareholder cases are also very bad.
Whooooooooooooo back, why? give some evidence......
This is a massive and reckless statement unless you give details to back it up.....
Sorry that was a joke in reference to the MD's name. Huge Lemon. Get it?
Other than that it was just sharing the audio interview which unfortunately I have no link for.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?