- Joined
- 27 June 2010
- Posts
- 4,324
- Reactions
- 367
Nuix is raising $975.3 million; of this, $875.3 million will go to existing investors selling down, while $100 million will be injected into Nuix. Macquarie, which owns more than 66 per cent of the business, will reduce its stake by more than half to 30 per cent.Nuix is slated to come to market with a $1.8 billion market capitalisation. The company, which has grown to be one of the largest private Australian software companies despite a cofounder being sent to prison before being acquitted for tax fraud, has created software which helps organisations identify patterns and trends from different types and formats of data, including unstructured data, which is generated by things such as social media, text documents and PDF files. This type of data does not fit neatly into a database table and is more challenging to interpret. These data insights are generally applied to fields such as cyber security, risk and compliance, and fraud investigations.
My sources say all the argy bargy is because the big end of town couldn't get enough in their allocations, so the 'negatives' were all a game to get access to more . We'll soon find out, the pre-opens are consistently high, now $9ish.Nuix is well-priced at $5.31 say fund managers. They point to the long-term prospects of the investigative analytics and intelligence software company, but aren't willing to hazard a guess as to how the stock will run on day one or over the first few months of trading.
...two years ago we were selling at 10 times revenues when we were at $64. At 10 times revenues, to give you a 10-year payback, I have to pay you 100% of revenues for 10 straight years in dividends. That assumes I can get that by my shareholders. That assumes I have zero cost of goods sold, which is very hard for a computer company. That assumes zero expenses, which is really hard with 39,000 employees. That assumes I pay no taxes, which is very hard. And that assumes you pay no taxes on your dividends, which is kind of illegal. And that assumes with zero R&D for the next 10 years, I can maintain the current revenue run rate. Now, having done that, would any of you like to buy my stock at $64? Do you realize how ridiculous those basic assumptions are? You don't need any transparency. You don't need any footnotes. What were you thinking?
. It is a quality business with +30% EBITDA margins and subscription business with renewing customers - most of whom are the big end of town (big 4 and the like) in their eDiscovery business.
Macquarie Group's remaining 30 per cent stake swelled from a $508 million valuation to more than $762 million on Friday. Held 63%, banked $566million selling a bit over HALFwith all management selling down almost all their stakes ...
. It's not pets.com.... In 20 years time, it would be far more lucrative having NXL at A$8 than buying Alphabet, Google's parent, at US$1823 a share.Could be interesting to see how this looks after 1-2 years when some of the risks have played out
I'll just leave this old quote from Scott McNealy...
Regardless its entirely possible NXL will be $20 by the end of December given the current state of equity markets and the tech sector!
I suspect there might be a few punters watching rather nervously?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?