- Joined
- 22 July 2009
- Posts
- 602
- Reactions
- 0
This has never happened since the indexes always move even if only a little.
Are you referring to the time premium of options?
The initial question assumes no movement for simplicity.
I am asking you...
Do you know what happens to the value of your long call after a day, if the underlying hasn't moved at all and why this is so?
Are you referring to the time premium of options?
Then I would guess that is the reason yes.
Hey G, long time no see. Hope all is well, iirc you are a father now. Congrats!Sorry to interrupt this thread. Just stopped by to ogle Mazzas avatar.
Why specifically call? Calls and puts are the same as being affected by time premium aren't they? What I meant was that they go down in value as they close in on the expiration date due to loss of time in which they can become more valuable, etc.
I'm not aware of anything else that can affect their intrinsic value if the market stays flat, just like I'm not aware of why you are quizzing me on this.
Why specifically call? Calls and puts are the same as being affected by time premium aren't they?
What I meant was that they go down in value as they close in on the expiration date due to loss of time in which they can become more valuable, etc.
I'm not aware of anything else that can affect their intrinsic value if the market stays flat, just like I'm not aware of why you are quizzing me on this.
Don't you mean 'extrinsic' value?
You should do some more research.
Great, so this is one of the non-linear aspects wayneL alludes to.
My question is then why
1) go long options when its value changes in response to the underlying but has time ticking against you (among other things??)
2) instead of futures whose value changes in response to the underlying as well, but you don't incur this "penalty"?
Really? a 4pt move = massive p/l? Scalping futs you can take 4pts, but i really doubt 4 pts will even covers the bid/ask spread on oppies. Which oppie chain are u looking at.But honestly, with asx200 options, when the market moves even 0.1% in the direction you bet, the massive amount of profit seems to outweigh everything else - so I have never noticed a decline in the value of the options I'm holding since the profits are very large in terms of ROI.
Also, do futures not have a time premium either? Don't they have an expiration date as well?
Ie. take this for instance:
http://www.forexpros.com/indices/australia-200-futures
Says: S&P/ASX200 Index Futures CFDs Mar 12 Overview
Additionally, if futures are so superior to ETOs, then why does the latter exist and be actively traded in the first place?
Additionally, if futures are so superior to ETOs, then why does the latter exist and be actively traded in the first place?
So overall, what is your point?
And you can just as easily lose 80% every day for a week
Only if you are really really dumb. And have some problem pulling out of a clearly bad position.
So overall, what is your point?
There are various clowns and buffoons who promote erroneous information on options. Some pitch it to the ignorant for large sums of money, some because they are ignorant themselves.
Anecdote: Enough digging in option archives in ASF, has a poster who came in and said it was "easy" (selling otm gamma, promoting positions that were essentially synthetic longs), didn't care for any risks presented to him/her, only to subsequently blow up.
Then there is always the Bill Stacy thread...
No, not DK. This person was on at least a 6 month winning streak and quite a few trades iirc before :fanOr is that Daniel K?
Sure there's always risks, but that's nothing to do with options...it doesn't really matter what instrument you use - if you predict the direction incorrectly, you will lose money. The quantity of money should be clear to everyone who trades said instrument - this is no secret at all.
Overall, sure is captain obvious in here.
Overall, sure is captain obvious in here.
Also, do futures not have a time premium either? Don't they have an expiration date as well?
You are fond of referring to others as 'stupid', yet in your attempts to not look stupid yourself... well, let's just say even Lao Tzu would be amused.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?