Picked up some today, probably bought way too early again sp down straight after I bought, anyway...
This business while not making any money at the moment is following in the footsteps of REA, with leading portals in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Hong Kong. They have recently had a breakthrough in the HK market and are a clear leader in Indonesia while Malaysia is actually making money. The are still trying to build a clear lead and network effect so there are risks but if successful the competitive advantage and pricing power in these markets should be satisfactory.
Have you looked at OTH? Same space and very useful product.
I like IPP's spread in Asia, but I don't know enough about those property markets to know how profitable they'd be over there.
Have you looked at OTH?
This is an interesting company, not so much because it's going to shoot the lights out but for what it might do to REA. Listings are free and everything is made back with banner advertising. I reckon all these free sites are at the very least going to eat away at the big, big margins the internet incumbents have. It's probably one of the advantages of the internet, a site like Gumtree can run on a shoestring but actually reaches a large audience and is 100% free.
Just wondering if anyone has had a look at IPP.
Have poached several REA executives recently and certainly looks to have a lot of upside.
Listed on the Australian Securities Exchange, IPGA Limited (ASX:IPP) owns Asia’s No. 1 network of property websites under the iProperty.com umbrella brand. The Company is focused on developing and operating Internet-based real estate portals with other complementary offerings in Asian markets. It currently operates consumer and business online property portals in the markets of Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong, India and Philippines. With further expansion planned, IPGA is continuously working to capitalise on its market-leading positions and the rapidly growing online property advertising market throughout the region.
I must say I use OTH as much as REA these day. REA still has a much better website, but I go for OTH for its historical prices.
The only reason I have not invested OTH (although I should have traded it) is that I don't know what's stopping REA from putting historical prices up on its site. That is OTH's only advantage and doesn't appear to be a sustainable one.
Careful with this one. I had a look recently and lots of factors that put me off, but the major ones are:
I'm unable to understand the cultural influence, politics and economics in the Asian countries that they operate in)
Management is suspect - the major shareholders seem to be playing political games at the moment - take a look at the sudden resignation of the chairman (lots of rumours surround this)
It's hard to predict with any certainty firstly when they will make a profit, and if so, how much? (ie. impossible to value)
show me an online business that do well in Asia that owned by foreigner?
even the juggernaut Google has a hard time in China and doesn't earn much
sometimes a good business and idea need the right business environment to prosper...
otherwise it's a pipe dream most of the time ...
Asia is a very different operating environment .... not easy to be successful....
I could be wrong, it's not so much that it is identifiably risky - it is more that your decision is based more on HOPE than anything else (from what I can tell - I admit you may know more than you are letting on). The hope lies in the fact that you have seen other businesses in online capacities take off and earn massive amounts of money without much capital. It doesn't always work like that - take a look at all of the businesses that did not make money. For the three that you named, there are many, many, many more that went no where fast - especially in Asia.True but the same could be said of REA, CRZ, WEB, et al a while ago. I agree it is certainly a risky investment.
I could be wrong, it's not so much that it is identifiably risky - it is more that your decision is based more on HOPE than anything else (from what I can tell - I admit you may know more than you are letting on).
The hope lies in the fact that you have seen other businesses in online capacities take off and earn massive a mounts of money without much capital. It doesn't always work like that - take a look at all of the businesses that did not make money. For the three that you named, there are many, many, many more that went no where fast - especially in Asia.
This is too speculative for me - I find it best not to swing at the next big thing, but I'm pretty boring!
OTH was pretty cheap in the 30 cent mark. I couldn't quite get my head around the industry dynamics and barriers to entry however.OTH does a trade off, free ads but they give potential buyers more information. So I guess they're dragging agents in by lowering costs and buyers in buy offering more data. Eventually re.com.au will respond, IMO.
Market leadership isn't always the whole story: industry profitability (on a regional scale) and barriers to entry have a lot to say about the true meaning of this. As Buffett often said: The best company in a poor industry still makes a bad investment.The other business I looked at with the same founder is recently listed ICQ, but I am happier taking the risk in IPP considering the revenue growth and established market leadership. (in some markets)
I am probably better at telling you what I would not invest in than what I would! One list is massive, the other is pretty short! There are two categories to the 'invest in' list: "Inevitables" and "Highly probables." I read way too much Buffett.That is what I like about you Ves, maybe we should team up if there were not too many arguments, the middle ground could be the best.
I take your point ROE but while they are listed on the ASX, the businesses are run from Asia. They are a clear number 1 in Malaysia, it will be very interesting to see how Indonesia goes seeing they have recently bought the number 1 and number 3 portals.
Market leadership isn't always the whole story: industry profitability (on a regional scale) and barriers to entry have a lot to say about the true meaning of this. As Buffett often said: The best company in a poor industry still makes a bad investment.
It's hard to get enough information on the Asian real estate industry in the companies that they operate in to get much bearings on these two factors IMO.
edit: This company also has a market cap of $166 million and does not make a single cent of profit at the moment. Another thought to ponder!
I am probably better at telling you what I would not invest in than what I would! One list is massive, the other is pretty short! There are two categories to the 'invest in' list: "Inevitables" and "Highly probables." I read way too much Buffett.
Good luck though - you are putting a lot more effort into your stock selection than most people. You will learn a lot by having a go - that's for sure!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?