Very interesting point made by 123 today, he said maybe, MAYBE, they did drill to TD, I can't see this happing, but GDN has been known to bend the truth b4. What will the next lot of garbage be they try to unload on us.
Pilots, unload on US. You ain't a holder (are you) so they aren't unloading on you my dear friend.
They did not drill to total depth. They told us that in the announcement.
Pilots stop feeding the monster that spurs fear in some holders with dribble that is not true and can not be proved in any case.
Wait a while then visit the Utah DOGM website and read the public well logs (they run about two weeks behind) and you can see what the drill management are reporting each day.
Please stick to the facts. Save that dribble for the other place
Cheers
Pilots fair enough. If its basement with PB#2 because of fault so be it. imo I am not concerned as they have plenty of strikes to test in the upper portion. Although they did say they are still in Alkali Gulch formation.
Personally I believe drilling deep now and on any other further wells is really not cost effective given risk is too high. Better to stay with 'what they know' in upper zones. They could revisit lower sections once they get some cash flowing.
As you suggested they could test flows with this rig. I'm up for that, see what they ann. soon about that. If I have too wait then I wait as thats what I been doing on this particular stock for some time.
Pilots
There u go again, dribble. FACTS u ask. Pilots please stop.
They have provided facts. Gas shows are facts backed up by measured units of background gas in drillers reports, FACTS. They have provided well depth of gas shows backed up by drillers reports, FACTS.
See Pilots, you are talking nonsense again, in riddles so it seems, rhetorical questioning.
Look, yes they need to flow the gas show zones which have been interrupted by a Geo US firm as being credible. We know that. Everyone knows that. Thats what is coming next, yeah.
LOL they cant win with you pilots, they were being responsible reporting "possible zones", if they had said "definate commercial" you would be be accusing them of ramping the stock.Back ground Gas won't tell you if the well is commercial. FACT
The facts they have told us about is that they have drilled some Gas zones, and this is from the GDN report that some of them zones ARE POSSIBLE commercial zones FACT. A good fact now would be to know what it will flow. Every well I have ever been on has had back ground Gas, and I can tell you we had a lot of dusters FACT.
I only read the last few posts, and hate to rain on your parade, but pilots is right. Background readings have very little bearing. You can have very high readings and a non-commercial well. You won't get any reliable numbers until it flows and even then it will degrade over time.
Pilots.... you must have lost so much money on this company because you seem so happy when you see others losing it and your hate for the company is overwhelming.. i bet you burn up when you even hear or read about gdn. you really do make it hard for the people who need an objective opinion instead of a constant negative one!!!
So what you are saying is that a well that has no gas readings has an equal chance of success as a well with high readngs.
I find that laughable.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?