Trend-Quality Indicator
by David Sepiashvili
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Having trouble detecting trends, or estimating their duration when you do spot one? This indicator comes to the rescue.
Trend detection and estimation is one of the most important objectives of technical analysis. One common filtering technique that attempts to eliminate stock market noise and extract important trends is smoothing with the help of moving averages. When using moving averages (MAs) to detect a trend in a security's price, the main difficulty is determining the appropriate averaging period.
To determine the appropriate period can be challenging because different periods have advantages and disadvantages. A shorter averaging period, for instance, may give higher profits but involve high risk, owing to numerous random fluctuations that affect the trend. A longer moving average helps avoid many false reversals by lagging behind the security's current prices, but as a rule, less risk means less profit.
The trend-quality indicator (or Q-indicator) is a trend detection and estimation tool that is based on a two-step filtering technique. It measures cumulative price changes over term-oriented semicycles and relates them to "noise." The approach reveals congestion and trending periods of the price movement and focuses on the most important trends, evaluating their strength in the process. The indicator is presented in a centered oscillator and banded oscillator format.
Even if you have tuned your moving average (MA) length, a new problem crops up: An optimized system gives good results on historical data but is vulnerable to significant market changes. This can mean disappointing results on new (future) data.
To me it looks like when you buy on a break out to the upside on a P&F. Its just like a Fractal Hi Buy on normal chart
It is in these horizontal formations, or congestion areas, on the
figure chart that we find the greatest aid: (a) in determining how
far a stock should go; (b) when it meets opposition, viz., when it
has about reached the end of its move; and with the help of the
vertical chart (c) determining the trend, and (d) when a stock is on
the springboard.......................................................................
On the other hand, the figure chart may show many fluctuations on the
full figures, while the verticals are unchanged. For example, if the
high full figure of a stock on a certain day were 45 and the low 40,
there might be several fluctuations back and forth between 42 and 43
on the figure chart, but no indication of this would appear on the
vertical chart. For these reasons it is vital to keep both forms of
charts.
Some people regard a stock (or the market) in this (springboard)
position only when it breaks through an old line of resistance or
support into a higher or lower field. I claim that the beginning of
the springboard move is at the bottom of a range of accumulation, or
in the upper levels of a range of distribution.
Richard D. Wyckoff
Hi,
OK - after being totally bamboozled by all those X's and O's I decided to spend a bit more time on this topic.
I have been reading up on P&F and surprising found that I am fairly comfortable with identifying the various patterns/concepts... eg. double tops, double bottoms, triangles, support, resistance, etc.
One concept that is not so obvious to me at the moment is determining where to place your stop loss from looking at the P&F charts, both on entry and as a trailing stop. Is it best to pick a generic technique such as an ATR multiple or are there some P&F techniques re: stop loss placement.
Also - any recommended Websites to look at re: P&F concepts ?
Thanks
Ace
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?