This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Equititrust?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jump to new
I think the Meridian Boys are having a bit of a laugh at the moment... The poncey, arrogant manner that Tucker conducted himself in was stomach churning to any decent person that came into contact with him.
So many on the bench in the Supreme Court encountered this miscreant as counsel and witnessed his antics in storming out of mediations and basically acting and being a c#ck.

Now that the day of Tucker's Public Humiliation has come 11 July 2017 many are not surprised...

You've made a lot of enemies "Davey Boy" and now they are bringing you to account legitimately through your preferred portal... The courts...

PS. Your welcome Chum
 
I can confirm that this sorry little tale of deception has now garnered substantial media interest...
There will definitely be a media presence at the Federal Court on the 11th of July 2017...

Make sure you bring all your homework "Davey Boy" as this will be your "audit" of the century...

Show us the money Tucker ... xxoo
 
I made a promise on this forum years back to expose all of you pr#ck's collectively involved in this despicable scam on poor elderly Australian investors. McIvor, Tucker , Kennedy ...

Myself and others notably {Kostag who started this thread} have been in the trenches for over 7 years.
We have been attacked by the likes of weasel Kennedy and McIvor under various non de plumes as well as many fake accounts which were exposed by the media.

We were proven correct in each instance.

Now dumb and dumber aka, Tucker and Kennedy have been exposed for the miscreants that they are and have thrown themselves into the flaming cauldron of the Federal Court as well as the cross hairs of this forum.

Wasn't it enough that they received fees for being CEO and legal fees for being the company lawyer...

No this pathetic greedy duo decided to conceal themselves and go in for another gorge of the carcass at the expense of legitimate innocent investors.

The massive conflict of interest didn't worry these two... They just decided to hide their involvement.

A question for the court on the 11th of July 2017 should be, "If all was legitimate, why hide your beneficial interest from the liquidator / receiver and the Supreme Court of Queensland ? "

The answer is, "IT WAS BLATENTLEY ILLEGAL" ...

http://www.couriermail.com.au/busin...5613d774f?sv=4cebcfcc3927e827f5b5017ed955cd9f
 
"Davey Boy" was warned he would be brought down and exposed a while back whilst he was flying high and presumed he was immune from the law"

This thread is a testament to the fact that we have kept our promise to Tucker and McIvor...

See you on the 11th of July 2017 its been a long time coming son...
 
If the Supreme Court was misled in regard to the undertaking as to damages for $250,000 then what right do people, who deceive the court, have to appear before it in the future ? If the court was purposely misled all those involved should be removed from the legal and insolvency profession.
 
Won't be surprised if there's a raid on files documents at any moment...
 
Dumb and Dumber may get a visit from the liquidator's friend Anton Piller...
He's the kind of friend that pays a visit, the kind of visit you don't really want...

Anton Piller KG v Manufacturing Processes Ltd [1976] Ch 55.
 
Last edited:
Brrrrrrrrrr ,Brrrrrrrrrr ,Brrrrrrrrrrrrr Shredders they are a work'n overtime....
 
Imagine the phone calls between Tucker / Kennedy and Worrells now...
Imagine if they were recorded... Yikes
 
Someone in the holy trinity of miscreants, has "rolled over" and has been recording the others... Apparently hours of damning evidence of phone calls and meetings... Smartphones and their apps are f#cking amazeballs...
 
Regulators are empathetic beasts and seem to lesson the penalties on the contrite...
 
The Supreme Court,,,,,, not so much... You mislead it, it wants your nuts on a chopping block... Deservedly so...
 
Now here's a fact to contemplate, Russell's lawyers who are acting for the Liquidator against Tucker and Kennedy have one Ashley Tiplady listed as a partner.

The same Ashley Tiplady that represented Equititrust / McIvor prior to both going belly up... That time he was working for Nyst Lawyers on the Gold Coast.

Coincidence ? Absolutely not...

http://www.russellslaw.com.au/experts/ashley-tiplady/
 
ASIC, finally acted against McIvor banning him for life. The same needs to occur against anyone who preferred their own interests against those of the investors of Equititrust, especially those who had continuing fiduciary duties...

"ASIC also said McIvor’s conduct involved breaches of the financial services legislation it dubbed “very serious, repetitive, prolonged and dishonest”.

http://www.goldcoastbulletin.com.au...r/news-story/3e27f869c87e8b698cba81ad22683b94
 
6.4 ASIC v Vizard Mr Vizard was a director of Telstra and obtained confidential information by reason of his position as a director. Vizard made improper use of that information by basing his decision to purchase or sell shares on the information, in order to obtain an advantage for himself, a company he established, and a trustee company in which he and his family beneficially held shares.
It was held that Vizard had contravened section 183, ie, the duty of a director to refrain from using confidential information obtained during the course of a directorship for an improper purpose. The court ordered pecuniary penalties and a disqualification order against Vizard.

ASIC v Stephen William Vizard [2005] FCA 1037

http://etraining.communitydoor.org.au/pluginfile.php/608/course/section/95/GuideDirectors_Apr08.pdf
 
Stephen Vizard was a funny guy, but what he did wasn't funny...
 
Directors’ Duties in Focus – Duty not to make improper use of information

"Directors have a duty not to make improper use of information. This duty exists under both the general law and s 183 of the Act. This duty overlaps with the duty not to make improper use of position, duty to avoid conflicts of interest. Fiduciary duties to act in the best interests of the company and not to make a secret profit are also related."

Statutory Duty
S 183(1) of the Act provides that a person who obtains information because they are, or have been, a director or other officer or employee of a corporation must not improperly use the information to:

  • gain an advantage for themselves;
  • gain an advantage for someone else or;
  • cause detriment to the corporation.
It does not matter if the director actually made a profit from the improper use of information. The duty applies to ‘other officers’ or ‘employees’ of a corporation, as well as the directors. The duty continues even after the person stops being an officer or employee of the corporation.

http://youlegal.com.au/directors-duties-focus-improper-use-information/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...